- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03489057
Efficacy of a Couple-Focused mHealth Symptom Self-management Program
September 9, 2024 updated by: UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Testing the Efficacy of a Couple-Focused, Tailored mHealth Intervention for Symptom Self-Management Among Men With Prostate Cancer and Their Partners
In this study, the investigators propose to test the efficacy of a couple-focused, web-based tailored prostate cancer symptom management program, Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC) in a randomized clinical trial.
A two-group (PERC versus National Cancer Institute (NCI) website plus treatment as usual) randomized controlled design will be used, and data will be collected at baseline (T1), 4 (T2), 8 (T3), and 12 months (T4) among 300 patients completing initial treatment for localized prostate cancer and their intimate partners (i.e., 600 participants in total).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
This randomized clinical trial aims to test the efficacy of a couple-focused, web-based tailored prostate cancer symptom management program, Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC).
The study participants will include 300 patients completing initial treatment for localized prostate cancer and their intimate partners (i.e., 300 dyads and 600 individuals).
After informed consent, we will conduct baseline assessment (T1), randomly assign eligible participants to either PERC or the National Cancer Institute (NCI) website, and then collect data at 4 (T2), 8 (T3), and 12 months (T4) post-T1.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
560
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27559
- University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
The eligible patients must
- be 40 to 75 years of age
- be within 16 weeks (4 months) after completing initial treatment for localized prostate cancer as confirmed by patient and biopsy pathology report) with curative intent, i.e., surgery or radiotherapy +/- hormonal treatment;
- have no previous cancer history within the past 2 years and not currently in treatment for cancer, or have a concurrent cancer (excluding non-melanomatous skin cancer);
- experience prostate cancer-specific and/or general symptoms;
- have a partner who is willing to participate.
The eligible partners must
- be 18 years or older
- be identified as the partner by the patient
- not have been diagnosed with cancer or receiving treatment for cancer within the past 12 months (non-melanomatous skin cancer diagnosis/treatment is acceptable) so that couples can focus their efforts on managing prostate cancer.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients and their partners will be excluded from the study if they:
- Do not read and speak English (evidenced by their understanding and responses to screening questions and self-reported ability to read English);
- Have cognitive impairment (assessed by the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PERC Program
Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC) program.
Participants assigned to experimental condition will receive access to the PERC website.
|
PERC uses mHealth technologies to dramatically increase couples' accessibility to posttreatment supportive care whenever and wherever they feel comfortable accessing it.
PERC aims to improve QOL for both patients and partners by enhancing positive appraisals of illness and boosting self-efficacy, social support from multiple sources, and healthy behaviors for symptom self-management at home.
|
|
Active Comparator: usual care plus NCI website
Participants in this usual care plus NCI website group will be automatically directed to the NCI prostate cancer website after logging in to the study website homepage.
|
The usual care plus NCI website provides generic information about prostate cancer treatment options, research, causes, and statistics; coping resources that are not prostate cancer-specific; support from non-providers via a toll free phone and LiveHelp Online Chat about cancer-related questions, clinical trials, and quitting smoking.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment (FACT-G) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8 and 12
|
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is used to measure change in quality of life of patient and partner from baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1).
Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value.
Functional assessment of Cancer Therapy-General is a 27-item survey which assesses physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating "not at all" and 4 indicating "very much" in response to item questions.
The total FACT-G score is calculated as the sum of four sub scores including physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being.
Total scores range between 0-108.
Higher scores indicated better well-being.
It has also demonstrated sensitivity to change over time.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8 and 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 6b is used to measure change in Pain Interference among patients and their partners from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8-mon post-T1), and T4 (12-mon post-T1).
Required by PROMIS scoring instrument, for all PROMS measurements, total raw scores are translated into T scores for each participant, where the T score rescales the raw score into a standardized T score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
The pain measures the extent to which patients experience problems with pain over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale.
Higher scores reflect greater Pain Interference.
The score value ranges between 41-78.3.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Fatigue From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
FACT-G is used to measure the change in the quality of life of patients and partners from baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1).
Change from baseline is the post-baseline values minus the Baseline value.
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General is a 27-item survey that assesses physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating "not at all" and 4 indicating "very much" in response to item questions.
The total FACT-G score is calculated as the sum of four sub-scores including physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being.
Total scores range between 0-108.
Higher scores indicated better well-being.
It has also demonstrated sensitivity to change over time.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Sleep Disturbance From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by PROMIS Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b is used to examine change in sleep quality of patients and their partners from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1).
Required by the PROMIS scoring instrument, for all PROMS measurements, total raw scores are translated into T scores for each participant, where the T score rescales the raw score into a standardized T score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
The sleep disturbance sub-scale measured the extent to which participants experienced sleep disturbance over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale.
Higher scores reflect greater sleep disturbance.
Score value ranges between 28.9-76.5.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Anxiety From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Anxiety Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Anxiety Short Form 7a is used to examine change in anxiety among patients and their partners from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1).
For all PROMS measurements, total raw scores are translated into T scores for each participant, where the T score rescales the raw score into a standardized T score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
The anxiety sub-scale of the PROMIS item bank measures the extent to which participants experience anxiety symptoms over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with the total scores range from 36.3 to 82.7 with higher scores reflect higher anxiety.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Depression From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Depression
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Depression Short From 8b is used to measure the change in depression scores among patients from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1).
Required by the PROMIS scoring instrument, for all PROMIS measurements, total raw scores are translated into T scores for each participant, where the T score rescales the raw score into a standardized T score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
The depression sub-scale of the PROMIS item bank measures the extent to which participants experience depressive symptoms in the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with the total scores range from 24.7 to 63.5 with higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Urinary Symptom Score (Patient Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
Urinary symptom scores change by time were measured using patients' self-assessed urinary symptoms subscale of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) which is designed to evaluate patient urinary function and bother after prostate cancer treatment.
EPIC26 was used at Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1).
EPIC26 evaluates patients' functional and symptom-specific issues, including urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms and bother.
The patient self-report contains 26 items, and the score range is 0-100.
Higher scores represent fewer prostate cancer symptoms and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Bowel Symptom Score (Patient Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
Bowel symptom scores change by time and were measured using patients' self-assessed bowel symptoms subscale of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) which is designed to evaluate patient function and bother after prostate cancer treatment.
EPIC was used at Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1).
EPIC26 evaluates patients' functional and symptom-specific issues, including urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms and bother.
The patient self-report contains 26 items, and the score range is 0-100.
Higher scores represent fewer prostate cancer symptoms and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Sexual Symptom Score (Patients Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
Sexual symptom scores change by time were measured using patients' self-assessed sexual symptoms subscale of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) which is designed to evaluate patient function and bother after prostate cancer treatment.
EPIC was used at Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1).
EPIC26 evaluates patients' functional and symptom-specific issues, including urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms and bother.
The patient self-report contains 26 items, and the score range is 0-100.
Higher scores represent fewer prostate cancer symptoms and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Hormonal Symptom Score (Patient Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
Hormonal symptom scores change by time were measured using patients' self-assessed hormonal subscale of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) which is designed to evaluate patient function and bother after prostate cancer treatment.
EPIC was used at Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1).
EPIC26 evaluates patients' functional and symptom-specific issues, including urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms and bother.
The patient self-report contains 26 items, and the score range is 0-100.
Higher scores represent fewer prostate cancer symptoms and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Urine Symptom Score (Partners Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
Urinary symptom scores change by time were measured using caregiver assessed urinary symptoms subscale of the 4-item caregiver version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form which is designed to assess how much of a bother/burden patients' prostate cancer symptoms were for the partners themselves.
EPIC-caregiver was used Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post-T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1).
The partner reported how patients' urinary and bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms bothered the caregivers.
The score range is 0-100.
Higher scores represent fewer bother partners reported and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Bowel Symptom (Partners Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
Bowel symptom scores change by time were measured using caregiver-assessed bowel symptoms subscale of the 4-item caregiver version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form which is designed to assess how much of a bother/burden patients' prostate cancer symptoms were for the partners themselves.
EPIC-caregiver was used Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1).
The partner reported how patients' urinary and bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms bothered the caregivers.
The score range is 0-100.
Higher scores represent fewer bother partners reported and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Hormonal Symptom Score Partners Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
Hormonal symptom scores change by time were measured using caregiver-assessed hormonal subscale of the 4-item caregiver version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form which is designed to assess how much of a bother/burden patients' prostate cancer symptoms were for the partners themselves.
EPIC-caregiver was used Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1).
The partner reported how patients' urinary and bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms bothered the caregivers.
The score range is 0-100.
Higher scores represent fewer bother partners reported and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC 26) Sexual Symptom Score Partners Only)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
Sexual symptom scores change by time were measured using caregiver assessed sexual symptoms subscale of the 4-item caregiver version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form which is designed to assess how much of a bother/burden patients' prostate cancer symptoms were for the partners themselves.
EPIC-caregiver was used Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8 months post-T1), and T4 (12 months post-T1).
The partner reported how patients' urinary and bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms bothered the caregivers.
The score range is 0-100.
Higher scores represent fewer bother partners reported and better prostate cancer-related quality of life.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Self-efficacy Scores From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by the Lewis Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
The Lewis Cancer Self-Efficacy will be used to measure change in patient and partner feelings of self-efficacy in dealing with the patient's cancer diagnosis and treatment from Baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1).
Change from baseline is the post-Baseline values minus the Baseline value.
Patients will rate statements about how confident they feel on a scale from 1 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Informational Support Scores From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Assessed by PROMIS-Informational Support Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 8a is a National Institute of Health-funded initiative to develop and validate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for clinical research and practice.
PROMISE is a set of measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health.
It uses a 5-point Likert scale.
The scoring process involved collecting PROMIS data from participants and calculating the PROMIS score as the sum of responses to each question.
Then Health Measures Scoring Service was used to calculate the PROMIS T-score - the standardized score.
Specifically, PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population (T-scores have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10).
On the T-score metric: A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population; A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Instrumental Support Scores From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Measured by PROMIS Instrumental Support-Short Form 8a
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 8a is a National Institute of Health-funded initiative to develop and validate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for clinical research and practice.
PROMISE is a set of measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health.
It uses a 5-point Likert scale.
The scoring process involved collecting PROMIS data from participants and calculating the PROMIS score as the sum of responses to each question.
Then Health Measures Scoring Service was used to calculate the PROMIS T-score - the standardized score.
Specifically, PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population (T-scores have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10).
On the T-score metric: A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population; A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Change in Appraisal of Illness Scores From Baseline to 4-, 8-, and 12-month Post Baseline as Measured by Appraisal of Illness Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
The appraisal of Illness scale is used to measure changes in perception of prostate cancer and related issues among patients and their partners.
The Appraisal of Illness scale is a 20-item measure that uses Likert Scales ranging from 1 to 5 (very false to very true).
The score range is 1-5.
The higher score indicated a better cognitive appraisal of the illness the patient or partner had.
The score is calculated by the Prorated mean scale scores.
The formula is prorated scale score =[SUM OF ITEM SCORES]x[N OF ITEMS IN SCALE]/[N OF ITEMS ANSWERED].
Measurements were performed at baseline (T1) to T2 (4 months post T1), T3 (8-months post-T1), and T4 (12-months post-T1).
Change from baseline is the post-baseline values minus the baseline value.
Higher scores indicate better support.
|
Baseline, month 4, 8, and 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lixin (Lee) Song, RN, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 30, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 6, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
July 31, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 28, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
April 5, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 3, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 9, 2024
Last Verified
September 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- LCCC 1713
- 1R01NR016990-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer
-
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy...RecruitingProstate Cancer Castration-resistant Prostate CancerChina
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteRecruitingObesity | Overweight | Cancer Survivor | Prostate Adenocarcinoma | Stage I Prostate Cancer | Stage II Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate Cancer | Stage IVA Prostate Cancer | Stage IVB Prostate Cancer | Stage A Prostate Cancer | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterProgenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.TerminatedRandomized Trial of PSMA PET Scan Before Definitive Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer (PSMA-dRT)Stage II Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Prostate...United States
-
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy...RecruitingProstate Cancer Castration-resistant Prostate CancerChina
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage I Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Prostate...United States
-
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteGenentech, Inc.CompletedRecurrent Prostate Cancer | Stage I Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; Prostate Cancer FoundationWithdrawnStage III Prostate Cancer | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IVA Prostate Cancer | Stage IVB Prostate Cancer | Stage IIIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIIB Prostate Cancer | Stage IIIC Prostate Cancer
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI); SanofiTerminatedDiarrhea | Recurrent Prostate Cancer | Hormone-resistant Prostate Cancer | Stage I Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedProstate Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteAIM ImmunoTech Inc.Active, not recruitingProstate Adenocarcinoma | Stage I Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer... and other conditionsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer Education and Resources for Couples (PERC)
-
Temple UniversityCompleted
-
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied SciencesDana-Farber Cancer Institute; Erasmus Medical Center; Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingProstate CancerNigeria, South Africa, Tanzania
-
Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedProstate CancerUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityVarian Medical SystemsRecruitingProstate Cancer | Breast Cancer InvasiveUnited States
-
Chinese University of Hong KongRecruiting
-
IRCCS San RaffaeleCompleted
-
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori,...UnknownHead and Neck Cancer | Prostate CancerItaly
-
Universidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheUniversidad de Murcia; Erasmus Medical Center; Thomas More University of Applied... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingProstate Cancer | Health LiteracySpain
-
Chongqing University Cancer HospitalEnrolling by invitation
-
Parker Institute for Cancer ImmunotherapyBristol-Myers Squibb; Cancer Research Institute, New York CityCompletedAdvanced Metastatic Cancer | Advanced Prostate CancerUnited States