Pain Research: Innovative Strategies With Marijuana (PRISM)

August 8, 2025 updated by: L. Cinnamon Bidwell, University of Colorado, Boulder

An Observational Study of the Effects of Edible Cannabis and Its Constituent Cannabinoids on Pain, Inflammation, and Cognition

This study tests the effects of cannabinoid levels in blood on pain relief, inflammation, and cognitive dysfunction in chronic pain patients who choose to use edible cannabis. Over a two-week period, participants use an edible product of their choice. Blood levels of 9-delta-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) will be measured before, during, and after the two-week exposure period to determine whether there are associations with pain, inflammation, sleep, physical activity, anxiety/depression, and cognitive dysfunction. After the two-week self-administration period, participants will be followed for six months to collect self-report data on cannabis use, pain levels, sleep quality, and mental health symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The National Center for Health Statistics reports that approximately 76 million Americans suffer from chronic pain, affecting the lives of more Americans than cancer, diabetes, and heart disease combined. Perhaps because of its ubiquity and the challenge to its treatment, relief from chronic pain is by far the most commonly cited condition by patients for use of marijuana, with 87%-94% of medical marijuana users reporting using for relief of a pain condition.

Although the mechanisms are still unclear, marijuana and its constituent cannabinoids, including 9-delta-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), are thought to be involved in reducing pain and associated inflammation. However, THC is also associated with harm in the form of cognitive dysfunction. Synergistic interactions of multiple cannabinoids are believed to produce different effects on both pain relief and cognitive function as compared to THC alone. For example, cannabidiol (CBD) is another primary cannabinoid that may work synergistically with THC in a multi-target analgesic approach.

This study examines the effects of cannabinoids in edible form on pain relief, inflammation, and cognitive dysfunction in chronic pain patients who choose to use marijuana in the context of a short-term (2 weeks), patient-oriented, observational design and a mobile pharmacology and phlebotomy lab.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

268

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Boulder, Colorado, United States, 80304
        • Center for Innovation and Creativity

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Community Sample

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Intent to initiate use of marijuana to treat chronic pain
  • At least one episode of lifetime marijuana use, but infrequent marijuana use for prior six months
  • Self-reported non-specific chronic low back pain for at least three months
  • Health eligibility approved by study physician
  • At least mild to moderate pain intensity OR pain interferes with important life functions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other drug use (cocaine, methamphetamine, etc.) in the past 3 days and/or actively seeking or in treatment for any substance use disorder
  • Use of marijuana to treat pain at any time in lives
  • Current use of psychotropic medications (other than SSRIs and ADHD meds), or use of antivirals, steroids, or regular use of maximal doses of NSAIDS
  • A daily tobacco user
  • Are currently pregnant or trying to become pregnant
  • Acute illness (other than chronic pain) or any immune-related disease (e.g., HIV)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Interference: Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)
Time Frame: Change over two time points over 2 weeks: Baseline (before 2 weeks of edible use), Pre-Administration (after 2 weeks of use and before acute administration) using the total RMDQ score (0-24).
The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire assesses self-rated physical disability caused by low back pain. Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more pain interference.
Change over two time points over 2 weeks: Baseline (before 2 weeks of edible use), Pre-Administration (after 2 weeks of use and before acute administration) using the total RMDQ score (0-24).
Inflammation: Circulating Levels of Cytokines
Time Frame: Change over two time points over 2 weeks: Baseline (before 2 weeks of edible use) and Pre-Administration (after 2 weeks of use and before acute administration).
Tests levels of recent inflammation (panel of inflammatory markers) before and after cannabis use. Higher numbers indicate higher levels of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines. Results are in pg/mL and are separated by the three cytokines: IL-1b, IL-6, and IL-10.
Change over two time points over 2 weeks: Baseline (before 2 weeks of edible use) and Pre-Administration (after 2 weeks of use and before acute administration).
Flanker Inhibitory Control Attention Task (FICA) & International Shopping List Task (ISLT)
Time Frame: Change over two time points over 2 weeks: Baseline (before 2 weeks of edible use), Pre-Administration (after 2 weeks of use and before acute administration).
Co-outcomes testing cognitive impairment in the domains of immediate and delayed recall (ISLT) and attention and inhibitory control (FICA). Cognitive outcomes are measured in standard scores (e.g. Range of >70 to >140 (Mean of 100 and SD of 15) with higher scores indicating better performance) and can be averaged to reflect a Standard score of overall cognitive function.
Change over two time points over 2 weeks: Baseline (before 2 weeks of edible use), Pre-Administration (after 2 weeks of use and before acute administration).
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognitive Scale (FACT-Cog)
Time Frame: Change over two time points over 2 weeks: Baseline (before 2 weeks of edible use), Pre-Administration (after 2 weeks of use and before acute administration).
Subjective report of cognitive function using the Perceived Cognitive Impairments subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognitive Scale (FACT-Cog). Possible scores range from 0-80 where higher scores are associated with higher levels of perceived impairment.
Change over two time points over 2 weeks: Baseline (before 2 weeks of edible use), Pre-Administration (after 2 weeks of use and before acute administration).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity: Current Pain Using NIH Pain Intensity Scale.
Time Frame: Change over 2 weeks
Test effects of cannabinoids on pain using the NIH Pain intensity scale for "current pain" (on a scale from 0-10 with 10 being the worst).
Change over 2 weeks
Health & Wellbeing
Time Frame: Change over 2 weeks

Self-report measure across primary domains of diet, assessment of sleep quality, and health-related well-being. Each domain was assessed with the following single items:

Diet: "In general, how healthy is your overall diet? Would you say" (response options 0- excellent; 1- very good; 2- good; 3- fair; 4- poor) Sleep Quality: "During the past 2 weeks, how would you rate your sleep quality overall?" (response options 0- very good; 1- fairly good; 2- fairly bad; 3- very bad") Health Related Wellbeing: "In general, how would you describe your health?" (response options 0- excellent; 1- very good; 2- good; 3- fair; 4- poor)

Change over 2 weeks
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Assessment (PSQI)
Time Frame: Change over 4 weeks
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Assessment (PSQI) is a self-report assessment of sleep quality.9 self-reported items belongs to one of seven subcategories: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Scores for each question range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more acute sleep disturbances (Scores range from 0 to 21 overall, with scores greater than 5 suggesting significant sleep difficulties).
Change over 4 weeks
Motor Function
Time Frame: Change over 2 weeks
Motor control assessed via dynamic sway and proprioception. Motor outcomes were aggregated to reflect a Z-score of overall motor function. Scores reported below are sum of Motor Battery Balance z-scores (Eyes Open, Eyes Closed, and Head Back). Higher scores correspond to worse balance- there is not a maximum score.
Change over 2 weeks
Depression and Stress
Time Frame: Change over 2 weeks

The DASS21 is a 21-item scale that measures self-reported change in anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms. Participants are asked to use 4-point severity/frequency scales (higher values indicate greater severity) to rate the extent to which they have experienced each state. For this aim, the Depression and Stress subscales were used.

Depression subscale score range 0-21 Normal (0 to 4), Mild (5 to 6), Moderate, (7 to 10), Severe (11 to 13), Extremely Severe (14 and above) Stress subscale score range 0-33 Normal (0 to 14), Mild (15 to 18), Moderate, (19 to 25), Severe (26 to 33)

Change over 2 weeks
Acute Cognitive Impairment: Flanker Inhibitory Control Attention Task (FICA) and International Shopping List Task (ISLT).
Time Frame: 2 Weeks
Co-outcomes testing cognitive impairment after acute use of cannabis in the domains of immediate and delayed recall (ISLT) and and attention and inhibitory control (FICA). Cognitive outcomes are measured in standard scores (e.g. Range of <70 to >140 (Mean of 100 and SD of 15) with higher scores indicating better performance) and can be averaged to reflect a Standard score of overall cognitive function.
2 Weeks
Patient Global Impression of Change: Global Impression of Change Scale (PGIC).
Time Frame: Change over 2 week primary exposure period.
Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (PGIC) measures self-reported change on a 1-7 scale (i.e. from 1 (very much worse) to 7 (very much improved) in pain. Changes in this measure will be tested in relation to THC and CBD blood levels. Scale possible score range 1-7, with higher scores indicating the largest amount of possible change. Importantly, it is a subjective self-assessment of change and is only measured at the 2 week timepoint.
Change over 2 week primary exposure period.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exploratory: Daily Follow-up Messages
Time Frame: 2 weeks (daily)
Brief self-report from participants on pain and sleep in the past 24 hours. These are 1-item novel questions in a daily, text based survey. Pain and sleep are on a scale of 1-10, with higher numbers being more pain or better sleep. Score is an average rating over 14 days.
2 weeks (daily)
Exploratory: Monthly Follow-up Surveys
Time Frame: 6 months (monthly)
Self-report from participants on pain levels (0-10 with 10 being worst pain), sleep quality (0-10 with 10 being best sleep), perceived cognitive ability (0 - 27 with 27 being the best), perceived cognitive impairments (0-72 with 72 being the worst), and general health (0-4 with 4 being best). Scores are reported as average scores reported once a month over six months.
6 months (monthly)
Objective Physical Activity/Exercise
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Physical activity via objective daily data on wearable watch as measured by average minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA).
2 weeks
Physical Activity/Exercise
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Physical activity via subjective self-report data using the Stanford Leisure-Time Activity Categorical item with 6 item responses (L-CAT; 1-6). Scores are reported as a mean between 1 and 6, larger numbers correspond to higher levels of activity.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cinnamon Bidwell, PhD, Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 10, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 12, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe