Clinical Practice Guidelines for Neck and Low Back Pain in Outpatient Physical Therapy

October 19, 2023 updated by: University of Florida

Health System Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Neck and Low Back Pain in Outpatient Physical Therapy Settings

This study will investigate implementation of a process to enhance Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) adherence to limit unwarranted variability in initial treatment decisions with high potential for providing more effective and efficient physical therapy management for patients with neck and low back pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Effective implementation of CPGs to augment initial clinical decision making during physical therapy management of patients with spine related musculoskeletal pain will have several important goals: 1) improve patient pain and disability outcomes, 2) limit over utilization of physical therapy services, and 3) increase adherence to limit unwarranted variation in clinical practice. This proposed pilot study proposal will test if a multifaceted intervention strategy for implementation of neck and low back CPG meets these goals and provide necessary data for larger system wide implementation efforts.

Specific Aim 1: Determine if physical therapy clinics that receive neck and low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guideline (CPG) training are associated with improved patient outcomes compared to those that have not received training. Neck and LBP specific disability and pain intensity will be assessed at intake, on a weekly basis and at discharge (Specific Aim 1a). Secondary patient outcomes will consist of patient satisfaction scores (Specific Aim 1b). Statistical analyses will evaluate for temporal effects of training considering the stepped wedge study design.

Specific Aim 2: Determine if multifaceted interventions for CPG implementation positively impacts physical therapist beliefs, attitudes, knowledge and behaviors over time. CPG adherence (by clinicians) will be indirectly assessed using quantitative and qualitative methods consisting of: 1) clinician checklists, 2) clinician questionnaires, 3) quality indicators, and 4) total proportion outcome measure assessments (Specific Aim 2).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1441

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32216
        • Brooks Rehabilitation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Receiving outpatient physical therapy for a diagnosis covered in previously published CPGs for neck or LBP
  • Able to read and comprehend English language (necessary for completion of self-report e-forms)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any diagnosis indicating systemic involvement
  • Widespread chronic pain syndrome
  • Neuropathic pain syndromes
  • Neurological disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Physical Therapists - CPG
Cross-sectional stepped wedge design with 16 physical therapy clinics (including approximately 40 physical therapists) being allocated to one of 4 sequences that differ in CPG implementation time (each sequence consisting of 4 clinics). This proposed study will be conducted over 68 weeks, with the initial 12 weeks serving as a baseline washout phase (before any clinic has received training), then 4 clinics crossing over from standard care (control) to CPG and decision support tool implementation (intervention) approximately every 8 weeks until week 44 when all 4 sequences (16 clinics) have completed training.
The Study team will use several methods from the implementation strategy taxonomy of the Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) classification system to improve our likelihood for successful neck and low back pain implementation consisting of: 1) educational materials, workshops and outreach visits from trainers; 2) external consultant testimonials; 3) iterative quality improvement processes (including ongoing analysis of clinician feedback to improve process); 4) routine collection of patient reported outcomes to engage discussion among clinician groups and outpatient division leaders) and 5) local organization consensus process (including feedback from key outpatient division stakeholders).
Active Comparator: Physical Therapists - Control
This proposed study will be conducted over 68 weeks, with the initial 12 weeks serving as a baseline washout phase (before any clinic has received training), then 4 clinics crossing over from standard care (control) to CPG and decision support tool implementation (intervention) approximately every 8 weeks until week 44 when all 4 sequences (16 clinics) have completed training.
Considering the stepped wedge design with a 12-week washout phase, clinics will be providing standard physical therapy prior to receiving clinical practice guideline training.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 68 weeks
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which has 10 items that assesses how low back pain affects common daily activities. The ODI has a range of 0% "no disability due to low back pain" to 100% "completely disabled due to low back pain", with higher scores indicating higher disability from low back pain.
68 weeks
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: 68 weeks
The Neck Disability Index (NDI), which has 10 items that assesses how neck pain affects common daily activities. The NDI has a range of 0% "no disability due to neck pain" to 100% "completely disabled due to neck pain", with higher scores indicating higher disability from neck pain.
68 weeks
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: 68 weeks
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Pain intensity will be rated using a NPRS, ranging from "0" (no pain) to "10" (worst pain imaginable). Patients will be asked to rate their current pain intensity, as well as their best and worst level of pain intensity over the past 24 hours. These 3 pain ratings will averaged and used as the NPRS variable in this study.
68 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rehabilitation Outpatient Division Patient Satisfaction Survey
Time Frame: 68 weeks
To assess overall therapy experience and explanations provided by therapist.
68 weeks
Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ)
Time Frame: 68 weeks
The Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ) to assess clinician beliefs, attitudes, knowledge and self-reported behaviors regarding evidence-based practice and clinical practice guidelines. Responses range from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree.
68 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jason Beneciuk, DPT,PhD,MPH, University of Florida; Brooks Rehabilitation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 14, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB201800569
  • 0045970 (710850-6) (Other Identifier: University of Pittsburgh)
  • 00000775 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Foundation for Physical Therapy)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation

3
Subscribe