Effects of Pilates Standing Exercises on Walking Mobility and Postural Balance

The Effects of Pilates Standing Exercises on Walking Mobility and Postural Balance in Sedentary Older Adults: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance: Aging is characterized by numerous molecular, physiological, functional, motor and psychological changes, such as loss of postural balance and reduced muscle mass/strength. Such modifications often lead to reduced physical-functional capacity in the elderly and increased risk of falls. Currently, physical exercise is widely used to improve physical performance and reduce, at least in part, postural instabilities and the risk of falls. In this context, the Pilates method may be a good strategy to improve body balance, muscle strength and, potentially, the perception of quality of life in this population, depending how the exercises are performed. This study seeks to assess whether practicing Pilates exercises in orthostatic position results in differential effects on walking mobility and postural balance in healthy elderly women when compared to the standard sequence in the Pilates method, which involves less time performing exercise in the orthostatic position. The study hypothesis is that a higher relative volume of Pilates exercises performed in the orthostatic position can promote greater benefits in terms of walking mobility and postural balance compared to the standard Pilates protocol in the elderly.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Importance: Aging is characterized by numerous molecular, physiological, functional, motor and psychological changes, such as loss of postural balance and reduced muscle mass/strength. Such modifications often lead to reduced physical-functional capacity in the elderly and increased risk of falls. Currently, physical exercise is widely used to improve physical performance and reduce, at least in part, postural instabilities and the risk of falls. In this context, the Pilates method may be a good strategy to improve body balance, muscle strength and, potentially, the perception of quality of life in this population, depending how the exercises are performed.

Objective: To evaluate whether practicing Pilates exercises in orthostatic position results in differential effects on walking mobility and postural balance in healthy elderly women when compared to the standard sequence in the Pilates method, which involves less time performing exercise in the orthostatic position.

Design, Methods and Participants: Clinical, single blind controlled and randomized trial. 36 previously sedentary elderly women will be included in the study and sign a Free and Informed Consent Term (TCLE). The Pilates protocols will be administered over 12 weeks on a bi-weekly scheme, and each session will last approximately 50 minutes. The subjects who agree to participate will be evaluated at baseline and immediately post-intervention.

Intervention: Subjects will be randomized to participate in the experimental group (Pilates exercises with emphasis on orthostatic posture) or control group (Pilates exercises practiced following traditional sequence of postures).

Main Outcomes and Measurements: The main outcome of the study will be walking mobility and postural balance, assessed using the Timed Up and Go test (single "motor" and dual task "cognitive-motor" tests), BERG Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test, and ABC Balance Confidence Scale).

Expected results: The experimental group is expected to perform better in terms of walking mobility and body balance, since hypothetically, a higher relative volume of orthostatic exercises would be more adequate for training anticipatory postural adjustments when compared to the traditional Pilates postural sequence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90619-900
        • Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sedentary for at least 6 months
  • To be available for one hour, twice a week, on two different working days to perform the proposed exercises.
  • To show preserved cognitive function, according to the mini-mental state examination criteria;
  • Be able to come and go on their own to the training location (Physiotherapy Laboratory at PUCRS).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical contraindications for performing physical exercises;
  • To show severe heart, orthopedic, neurological or other diseases/conditions that may affect the outcome measures;
  • Practicing physical exercises outside the study protocol;
  • Absence of independent gait.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SCREENING
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Standing Pilates protocol
Subjects will be submitted to a bi-weekly, 50-minute session of Pilates exercises focusing on orthostatic position, for twelve weeks. The following equipment will be used: The Cadillac, Reformer and Chair, emphasizing balance training in the orthostatic position.
Subjects will be submitted to a bi-weekly, 50-minute session of Pilates exercises focusing on orthostatic position, for twelve weeks. The following equipment will be used: The Cadillac, Reformer and Chair, emphasizing balance training in the orthostatic position.
Other Names:
  • Pilates exercises in orthostatic position
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard Pilates protocol
Subjects will be submitted to a bi-weekly, 50-minute session of the standard sequence of Pilates exercises (traditional sequence of the contemporary / classical method) for twelve weeks. The exercises will be performed using the same equipment used in the intervention group, but following the dorsal decubitus, sedestation and orthostasis, in a time-balanced distribution in each session.
Subjects will be submitted to a bi-weekly, 50-minute session of the standard sequence of Pilates exercises (traditional sequence of the contemporary / classical method) for twelve weeks. The exercises will be performed using the same equipment used in the intervention group, but following the dorsal decubitus, sedestation and orthostasis, in a time-balanced distribution in each session.
Other Names:
  • Standard Pilates exercises

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Walking mobility (Timed Up and Go Test)
Time Frame: Post-intervention (change after 12 weeks of training)
Walking mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go tests (single and dual task - cognitive/motor). It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. During the test, the person is expected to wear their regular footwear and use any mobility aids that they would normally require.
Post-intervention (change after 12 weeks of training)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postural balance - Functional Reach Test
Time Frame: Post-intervention (change after 12 weeks of training)
Postural balance will be assessed using the Functional Reach Test. The FRT is a quick single-task dynamic test defined as the maximal distance one can reach forward beyond arm's length, while maintaining a fixed base of support in the standing position.
Post-intervention (change after 12 weeks of training)
Postural balance - BERG Balance scale
Time Frame: Post-intervention (change after 12 weeks of training)
The Berg balance scale is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function.
Post-intervention (change after 12 weeks of training)
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale.
Time Frame: Post-intervention (change after 12 weeks of training)
For each assessed activity, the subjects indicate their level of confidence in doing the activity without losing your balance or becoming unsteady from choosing one of the percentage points on the scale from 0% to 100%. If subjects do not currently do the activity in question, they should imagine how confident they would be if had to do the activity. If they normally use a walking aid to do the activity or hold onto someone, subjects should rate their confidence as if they were using these supports.
Post-intervention (change after 12 weeks of training)
Quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey - SF-36)
Time Frame: Post-intervention (change after 12 weeks of training)
Quality of life will be assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores (vitality; physical functioning; bodily pain; general health perceptions; physical role functioning; emotional role functioning; social role functioning; and mental health.), which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Post-intervention (change after 12 weeks of training)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Activity Levels
Time Frame: Baseline
Physical Activity Levels will be assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) estimates the weekly energy expenditure for physical activities (PA). This instrument was validated for use with Brazilian older adults. The report of the IPAQ adapted for older adults should be delivered in minutes per week.
Baseline
Cognition screening
Time Frame: Baseline
Cognitive decline will be screened using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Folstein test is a 30-point questionnaire that is used extensively in clinical and research settings to measure cognitive impairment. Any score greater than or equal to 24 points (out of 30) indicates a normal cognition. Below this, scores can indicate severe (≤9 points), moderate (10-18 points) or mild (19-23 points) cognitive impairment. The raw score may also need to be corrected for educational attainment and age. That is, a maximal score of 30 points can never rule out dementia. Low to very low scores correlate closely with the presence of dementia, although other mental disorders can also lead to abnormal findings on MMSE testing.
Baseline
Depression screening
Time Frame: Baseline
Depression will be screened using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). The scale consists of 30 yes/no questions. Each question is scored as either 0 or 1 points. The following general cutoff may be used to qualify the severity: 0-9 as "normal", 10-19 as "mildly depressed", and 20-30 as "severely depressed".
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 30, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 8185

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

We will make all efforts to publish and make individual participant data (IPD) available, according to the requirements of the scientific journal that accepts this research.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on Standing Pilates protocol

3
Subscribe