Effectiveness of Different Weekly Frequency of Modified Pilates Method Exercises in the Treatment of Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

September 5, 2017 updated by: Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo

Cost Effectiveness and Effectiveness of the Addition of Different Weekly Frequency of Modified Pilates Method Exercises to a Minimal Intervention in the Treatment of Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Low back pain is a major cause of disability and absenteeism and the supervised exercise is a recommended treatment by the guidelines and has been cost-effective. Currently, the Pilates method has shown to be effective in improving pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, there is still no evidence about the ideal number of sessions for the treatment and the interval between sessions to achieve better efficacy of this method for these patients. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the Pilates method with different weekly frequency of sessions in the treatment of patients with nonspecific CLBP. Investigators will assess 296 patients of both genders, with nonspecific CLBP lasting more than three months and aged between 18 and 80 years. Participants will be randomly divided into four groups (n = 74 patients per group): Control Group will receive an educational booklet and no additional exercise, Pilates 1 Group will receive a program of exercises based on Pilates method once a week for six weeks, Pilates 2 Group will receive the same program of exercises twice a week for six weeks and Pilates 3 Group will receive the same program of exercises three times a week for six weeks. The outcomes overall disability (Roland Morris Disability questionnaire), specific disability (Patient-Specific Functional scale), kinesiophobia (Tampa scale for kinesiophobia), pain intensity (Pain Numerical Rating scale) and global perceived effect (Global Perceived Effect scale) will be assessed by a blinded assessor before, six weeks, six and 12 months after randomization. Investigators expect that the largest number of weekly sessions of Pilates method may influence the results in all analyzes (short, medium and long term), since there is a relationship between frequency of exercises and effect size of the treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

296

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 03071000
        • Physical Therapy Outpatient Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain longer 12 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contra indications to physical exercise
  • Serious spinal pathologies (e. g. tumors, fractures and inflammatory diseases)
  • Nerve root compromise
  • Pregnancy
  • Previous surgery on spine
  • Pilates treatment for low back pain in the last three months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pilates 1
Combination of an educational booklet with exercises of the Pilates method. Patients will receive 6 sessions of treatment over a period of 6 weeks (1 session/week). The exercises of the Pilates method will be individualized to each patient´s needs (pragmatic treatment).
Combination of an educational booklet with exercises of the Pilates method. Patients will receive 6 sessions of treatment over a period of 6 weeks (1 session/week). The exercises of the Pilates method will be individualized to each patient´s needs (pragmatic treatment).
Experimental: Pilates 2
Combination of an educational booklet with exercises of the Pilates method. Patients will receive 12 sessions of treatment over a period of 6 weeks (2 sessions/week). The exercises of the Pilates method will be individualized to each patient´s needs (pragmatic treatment).
Combination of an educational booklet with exercises of the Pilates method. Patients will receive 12 sessions of treatment over a period of 6 weeks (2 sessions/week). The exercises of the Pilates method will be individualized to each patient´s needs (pragmatic treatment).
Experimental: Pilates 3
Combination of an educational booklet with exercises of the Pilates method. Patients will receive 18 sessions of treatment over a period of 6 weeks (3 sessions/week). The exercises of the Pilates method will be individualized to each patient´s needs (pragmatic treatment).
Combination of an educational booklet with exercises of the Pilates method. Patients will receive 18 sessions of treatment over a period of 6 weeks (3 sessions/week). The exercises of the Pilates method will be individualized to each patient´s needs (pragmatic treatment).
Active Comparator: Control
Patients will receive an educational booklet containing information about the anatomy of the spine and pelvis and the low back pain and recommendations regarding posture and movements involved in activities of daily living. The participants in this group will not receive additional exercise.
Patients will receive an educational booklet containing information about the anatomy of the spine and pelvis and the low back pain and recommendations regarding posture and movements involved in activities of daily living. The participants in this group did not receive additional exercise.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Six weeks after randomization
Pain intensity will be measured by an 11-point Pain Numerical Rating Scale
Six weeks after randomization
Disability
Time Frame: Six weeks after randomization
Disability associated with low back pain will be measured by the 24-item Roland Morris Disability Questionaire
Six weeks after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Six and twelve months after randomization
Pain intensity will be measured by an 11-point Pain Numerical Rating Scale
Six and twelve months after randomization
Disability
Time Frame: Six and twelve months after randomization
Disability associated with low back pain will be measured by the 24-item Roland Morris Disability Questionaire
Six and twelve months after randomization
Global impression of recovery
Time Frame: Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization
Global impression of recovery will be measured by an 11-point Global Perceived Effect Scale
Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization
Specific disability
Time Frame: Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomizaion
Specific disability will be evaluated by an 11-point Patient-specific Functional Scale
Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomizaion
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization
Kinesiophobia will be evaluated by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia
Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization
Pain-Related Catastrophizing
Time Frame: Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization
Pain-related catastrophizing will be evaluated by the Pain-Related Catastrophizing Thoughts Scale
Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization
Cost Effectiveness
Time Frame: Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization
Assessments of direct costs (patient out-of-pocket costs) by an specific questionnaire.
Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization
Quality Adjusted Life Years
Time Frame: Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization
Quality adjusted life years will be measured by the SF-6D questionnaire
Six weeks, six and twelve months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 29303014.7.0000.0064

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Pilates 1

Subscribe