Allogeneic ABCB5-positive Stem Cells for Treatment of Epidermolysis Bullosa

October 6, 2022 updated by: RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG

An Interventional, Multicenter, Single Arm, Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Allo-APZ2-EB on Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB)

The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy (by monitoring overall improvement of EB symptoms) and safety (by monitoring adverse events) of three doses of allo-APZ2-EB administered intravenously to patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is an interventional, single arm, non-randomized, open label, phase I/IIa clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of the IMP allo-APZ2-EB in patients with RDEB.

Patients will undergo treatment with the IMP (three repeated intravenous applications) and will be followed up for efficacy for 12 weeks. To assess long-term safety of allo-APZ2-EB one follow-up visit at Month 12 and one follow-up visit at Month 24 post IMP applications is included.

Determination of the EB linked symptoms and quality of life will be assessed by using the EBDASI score, the iscorEB, the change in pain and itch perception, and patient's quality of life in EB. The wound healing process will be documented by photography.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Salzburg, Austria, 5020
        • EB-Haus Austria; Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK); Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität Salzburg (PMU)
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Hôpital Saint-Louis; Département de dermatologie
      • Freiburg, Germany, 79104
        • Department of Dermatology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg
      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 9RT
        • King's College London; St John's Institute of Dermatology;
      • London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3JH
        • Great Ormond Street Hospital; Dermatology Department
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota, Masonic Cancer Center and Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second to 55 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Male or female patients aged between 0 and ≤55 years;

Staggered design for patient enrollment:

  1. at least 3 adult patients (safety assessment 2 weeks after last treatment of third patient),
  2. at least 3 patients ≥12 to <18 years (safety assessment 2 weeks after first treatment of third patient),
  3. at least 3 patients ≥5 to <12 years (safety assessment 2 weeks after first treatment of third patient), and
  4. at least 3 patients ≥12 months to <5 years;
  5. patients 0 to <12 months (only in the UK);

2. Diagnosed with RDEB (combined diagnosis by genotype assessment [mutation analysis] and correlating phenotype assessment [wound assessment]), patients must have a negative immunofluorescence test result on salt-split skin against proteins of the basement membrane at Visit 1 (existing test results will be accepted);

3. Patient is eligible to participate in this clinical trial based on general health condition at the investigator's discretion;

US only:

Patient is eligible to participate in this clinical trial based on general health condition assessed by specific lab values (Hematology: Absolute neutrophil count >1000/mm3 and platelet count >150,000/mcL; Coagulation: PT and PTT <2x the upper limit of normal for age; Hepatic: AST and ALT <2x the upper limit of normal for age; Renal: Creatinine <2x the upper limit of normal for age; Pulmonary: Oxygen saturation >92% on room air and without supplemental oxygen requirement);

4. Patient/legal representative understands the nature of the procedure and are providing written informed consent prior to any clinical trial procedure;

5. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1;

6. Women of childbearing potential and their partner must be willing to use highly effective contraceptive methods during the course of the clinical trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Tumor diseases or history of tumor disease;
  2. Known positive result for human immunodeficiency virus 1 and/or 2;
  3. Any known allergies to components of the IMP;
  4. Evidence of any other medical conditions (such as psychiatric illness or active infection) based on physical examination, or laboratory findings that may interfere with the planned treatment, affect the patient's compliance, or place the patient at high risk of complications related to the treatment; at investigators discretion;
  5. History of prior thrombosis or patients at risk for thrombosis;
  6. Clinically significant or unstable concurrent disease or other clinical contraindications (based upon investigator's judgment);
  7. Patient/legal representative anticipated to be unwilling or unable to comply with the requirements of the protocol;
  8. Pregnant or lactating women;
  9. Current or previous (within 30 days of enrollment) treatment with another IMP, or participation and/or under follow-up in another clinical trial;
  10. Previous participation in this clinical trial (except for screening failures due to an exclusion criterion);
  11. Known abuse of alcohol, drugs, or medicinal products;
  12. Employees of the sponsor, or employees or relatives of the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: allo-APZ2-EB
intravenous infusion, three doses of allo-APZ2-EB (2 x 10^6 cells/kg)
intravenous infusion of allo-APZ2-EB
Other Names:
  • allogeneic ABCB5-positive mesenchymal stem cells

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall improvement of EB symptoms after 12 weeks (measured by percentage change of a patient's EBDASI score), score), or last available post-baseline measurement if the Week 12 measurement is missing
Time Frame: Week 12 post baseline, or last available post-baseline measurement if the Week 12 measurement is missing (last observation carried forward [LOCF])
EBDASI: epidermolysis bullosa disease activity and scarring index; measured in percentage change to baseline score
Week 12 post baseline, or last available post-baseline measurement if the Week 12 measurement is missing (last observation carried forward [LOCF])
Assessment of adverse event (AE) occurrence
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
All AEs occurring during the clinical trial will be registered, documented and evaluated.
Up to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall improvement of EB symptoms after 12 weeks (measured by percentage change of a patient's EBDASI score)
Time Frame: between baseline and week 12 post baseline (without LOCF)
EBDASI: epidermolysis bullosa disease activity and scarring index; measured in percentage change to baseline score
between baseline and week 12 post baseline (without LOCF)
Overall improvement of EB symptoms after 12 weeks (measured by percentage change of patient's iscorEB), or last available post-baseline measurement if the Week 12 measurement is missing
Time Frame: Week 12 post baseline, or last available post-baseline measurement if the Week 12 measurement is missing (LOCF);
iscorEB: instrument for scoring clinical outcome of research for epidermolysis bullosa; measured in percentage change to baseline score
Week 12 post baseline, or last available post-baseline measurement if the Week 12 measurement is missing (LOCF);
Overall improvement of EB symptoms after 12 weeks (measured by percentage change of patient's iscorEB)
Time Frame: between baseline and week 12 post baseline (without LOCF)
iscorEB: instrument for scoring clinical outcome of research for epidermolysis bullosa; measured in percentage change to baseline score
between baseline and week 12 post baseline (without LOCF)
Overall improvement of EB symptoms at Day 17 (measured by percentage change of a patient's EBDASI score)
Time Frame: between baseline and day 17 post baseline
EBDASI: epidermolysis bullosa disease activity and scarring index; measured in percentage change to baseline score
between baseline and day 17 post baseline
Overall improvement of EB symptoms at Day 17 (measured by percentage change of a patient's iscorEB)
Time Frame: between baseline and day 17 post baseline
iscorEB: instrument for scoring clinical outcome of research for epidermolysis bullosa; measured in percentage change to baseline score
between baseline and day 17 post baseline
Overall improvement of EB symptoms at Day 35 (measured by percentage change of a patient's EBDASI score)
Time Frame: between baseline and day 35 post baseline
EBDASI: epidermolysis bullosa disease activity and scarring index; measured in percentage change to baseline score
between baseline and day 35 post baseline
Overall improvement of EB symptoms at Day 35 (measured by percentage change of a patient's iscorEB)
Time Frame: between baseline and day 35 post baseline
iscorEB: instrument for scoring clinical outcome of research for epidermolysis bullosa; measured in percentage change to baseline score
between baseline and day 35 post baseline
Inflammation (measured by panel of inflammation markers)
Time Frame: between baseline and day 17, day 35 and week 12 post baseline
A panel of inflammation markers will be measured and evaluated.
between baseline and day 17, day 35 and week 12 post baseline
Pain assessment as per NRS
Time Frame: between baseline and day 17, day 35 and week 12 post baseline
Pain assessment as per numerical rating scale (NRS) will be evaluated.
between baseline and day 17, day 35 and week 12 post baseline
Itch assessment as per NRS
Time Frame: between baseline and day 17, day 35 and week 12 post baseline
Itch assessment as per numerical rating scale (NRS) will be evaluated.
between baseline and day 17, day 35 and week 12 post baseline
Differences in patient's quality of life in EB
Time Frame: between baseline and day 17, day 35 and week 12 post baseline
Assessment of quality of life data using an EB-specific quality of life questionnaire
between baseline and day 17, day 35 and week 12 post baseline
Physical examination until Week 12;
Time Frame: At Screening, baseline, day 17, day 35 and week 12
A full physical examination will be performed and abnormal physical examination results will be evaluated and reported as AEs.
At Screening, baseline, day 17, day 35 and week 12
Vital signs: Body temperature until Week 12;
Time Frame: At Screening, baseline, day 17, day 35 and week 12
Body temperature will be evaluated at Screening, baseline, day 17, day 35 and week 12
At Screening, baseline, day 17, day 35 and week 12
Vital signs: Blood pressure until Week 12;
Time Frame: At Screening, baseline, day 17, day 35 and week 12
Blood pressure will be evaluated at Screening, baseline, day 17, day 35 and week 12
At Screening, baseline, day 17, day 35 and week 12
Vital signs: Heart rate until Week 12;
Time Frame: At Screening, baseline, day 17, day 35 and week 12
Heart rate will be evaluated at Screening, baseline, day 17, day 35 and week 12
At Screening, baseline, day 17, day 35 and week 12
Overall survival at month 24
Time Frame: month 24 post baseline
month 24 post baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jakub Tolar, MD, PhD, University of Minnesota, Masonic Cancer Center and Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 26, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 26, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe