Peanut and Tree Nut Desensitization

Peanut/Tree Nut Desensitization and Induction of Tolerance in Children

this study evaluates whether tolerance to peanuts and tree nuts can be induced in patients through a process of oral immunotherapy. Participants will be randomized into groups receiving oral immunotherapy and a control group that will receive no intervention

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The investigators are proposing to initiate a study assessing a common desensitization protocol for peanut/tree nut allergy. This study would enable the investigators to better determine the potential benefit of desensitization in individuals with peanut/tree nut allergy.

More specifically, the investigators will address the following research objectives:

Objectives A. To develop a protocols for peanut/tree nut desensitization with high (300mg) and low (30mg maintenance dose).

B. To determine the rate of desensitization to peanut/tree nut. C. To characterize predictors of successful desensitization. D. To characterize molecular mechanisms involved in the process of desensitization

These objectives will be evaluated through a randomized controlled trial

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8
        • Hospital For Sick Children
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3J1
        • Montreal Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 40 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria: Patients between 2 and 40 years of age who satisfy all the following criteria will be included:

  • A history suggestive of immediate allergy to peanut/tree nut . A convincing clinical history of an IgE mediated reaction to a specific food will be defined as a minimum of 2 mild signs/symptoms or 1 moderate or 1 severe sign/symptom that was likely IgE mediated and occurred within 120 minutes after ingestion or contact (or inhalation in the case of fish and shellfish). Reactions will be considered mild if they involve pruritus, urticaria, flushing, or rhinoconjunctivitis; moderate if they involve angioedema, throat tightness, gastrointestinal complaints, or breathing difficulties (other than wheeze); and severe if they involve wheeze, cyanosis, or circulatory collapse.(54-57)
  • The presence of at least one of the following confirmatory tests:

    • Positive SPT to peanut/tree nut or its proteins (weal diameter 3 mm larger than that of the normal saline control). The allergens used will be commercial extracts of peanut/tree nut (Omega Labs, Toronto, Ontario).
    • Detection of serum specific IgE (>0.35 kU/L) to peanut/tree nut or any of its proteins, measured by fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (Phadia, CAP System, Uppsala, Sweden).
    • Positive oral challenge test to peanut/tree nut. Oral challenges will be performed with raw peanut/tree nut according to the recommendations of the position paper of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (58).
  • Informed consent form signed by the parents or legal guardian

Exclusion criteria.

  • Patients who are unstable from a respiratory point of view ..
  • Patients who present with intercurrent disease at the time of starting desensitization.
  • Non-IgE-mediated or non-immunological adverse reactions to nuts.
  • Malignant or immunopathological diseases and/or severe primary or secondary immune deficiencies.
  • Patients receiving immunosuppressor therapy
  • Patients receiving β-blockers (including topical formulations).
  • Associated diseases contraindicating the use of epinephrine: cardiovascular disease or severe hypertension.
  • Patients diagnosed with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
Following randomization, this arm will receive no intervention. After twelve months, participants in this group will undergo a singe-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Low-dose
Following randomization, participants in this group will receive escalating doses of the appropriate allergen, up to a dose of 30 mg. Once they attain that dose, they will maintain it for six months. At the end of this maintenance period, they will undergo a singe-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge
Starting from a very low level and over a period of several months, participants receive escalating doses of the food to which they are allergic
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: High-dose
Following randomization, participants in this group will receive escalating doses of the appropriate allergen, up to a dose of 300 mg. Once they attain that dose, they will maintain it for six months. At the end of this maintenance period, they will undergo a singe-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge
Starting from a very low level and over a period of several months, participants receive escalating doses of the food to which they are allergic

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of desensitization in peanut/tree nut allergic patients as measured by blinded, placebo controlled oral food challenge
Time Frame: 21 months
Comparison of participants randomized to treatments arms who achieve peanut/tree nut desensitization compared to participants randomized to the control groups. This is measured by whether a participant is able to tolerate a total dose of 4172 mg crushed peanut or tree nut during an oral food challenge
21 months
Comparison of efficacy of 30 mg dose versus 300 mg dose in inducing desensitization to peanut or tree nut as measured by blinded, placebo controlled oral food challenge
Time Frame: 21 months
Participants in the 30 mg arm will be compared to those in the 300 mg in terms of dose tolerated at post-immunotherapy blinded, placebo-controlled oral food challenge, as well as side effects experienced during immunotherapy
21 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specigic IgE levels
Time Frame: 21 months
Measurement of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specigic IgE before, during and after the desensitization process
21 months
Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specigic IgA levels
Time Frame: 21 months
Measurement of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specigic IgA before, during and after the desensitization process
21 months
Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specigic IgG4 levels
Time Frame: 21 months
Measurement of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specigic IgG4 before, during and after the desensitization process
21 months
Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of mast cell activation as measured by CD63 expression
Time Frame: 21 months
Measurement of mast cell activation as measured by CD63 expression before, during and after the desensitization process
21 months
Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of of DNA methylation levels
Time Frame: 21 months
Measurement of DNA methylation levels before, during and after the desensitization process
21 months
Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of Regulatory T cell levels
Time Frame: 21 months
Measurement of Regulatory T cell levels, before, during and after the desensitization process
21 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 19, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 2, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 2, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peanut Allergy

Clinical Trials on Oral immunotherapy

3
Subscribe