Molecular Profiling to Improve Outcome of Patients in Cancer. A Pilot Study (MULTIPLI-0)

Molecular Profiling to Improve Outcome of Patients in Cancer. A Pilot Study (MULTIPLI-0)

Next Generation Sequencing in cancer: a feasibility study in France to assess sample circuit and to perform analyzes within a limited time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The first France disease genomic medicine program in the field of cancer has been retained by the 2025 Genomic Medicine France Plan. This program, called MULTIPLI encompasses two innovative personalized medicine clinical trials in soft-tissue sarcoma and colorectal carcinoma involving targeted molecules according to the tumor profile of each patient.

This 1st clinical research program aims implementing exome sequencing and RNA sequencing to determine the genomic profile and to provide a therapeutic decision for each patient. Genomic analyzes will be performed on different technical platforms: samples will be collected in each investigating center, nucleic acids extraction will be performed on two genetic platforms, Inca labeled and identified for the purpose of this study: Institut Bergonié and Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou. CNRGH (Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine) was retained for operational platform genomics and Institut Bergonie for bioinformatics data processing. Each genomic profile will be discussed within a multidisciplinary tumor board which aims at providing a therapeutic decision for each patient and to propose a targeted treatment in case of actionable molecular alteration.

The purpose of this program is to perform analysis on a set of gene, in order to provide results no more than after 6 weeks after the sample arrival on the biopathological platform. This gene panel analysis is based on the predefined list of genes that are direct targets of the drugs available in the MULTIPLI program.

Before implanting this program in a large-scale launch, it was essential to set up a pilot study in order to evaluate both sample's management between several platforms, and the time to report the results, and to verify that it was in line with the objectives set.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • Institut Bergonié
      • Paris, France, 75000
        • Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
      • Évry, France, 91057
        • CEA / Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients included in this prospective cohort study are patients who have previously consented to tumor sequencing either as part of others studies or as part of standard care (voluntary signed informed consent). Two participating centers have been retained.

Samples used (blood and tumor) are issued from these previous collection and analyzed for the same purpose: no additional samples will be collected.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients
  • Disease: Advanced and/or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma OR metastatic carcinoma
  • Patient consenting to tumor sequencing, secondary reuse of their data
  • Patient informed about this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
STS
Patients with advanced/metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma

Tumor and blood samples will be sequenced at medium-high coverage at the whole genome (exome) and transcriptome levels (RNA Seq). This will allow detecting variants in a larger set of samples even though only from the main clone will be precisely measured. The whole exome will be performed at a mean coverage of at least 60x for the normal DNA samples and 120x for the tumor DNA samples. The transcriptome of the tumor will be performed at enough depth of coverage to detect gene fusions, transcriptome variants and measure the digital expression of already annotated isoforms.

For both sequencing configurations:

  • Data from each cancer and normal genome will be analysed for the presence of somatic variants.
  • DNA and RNA sequencing results will be integrated.
  • Technical replication for the mutations / chromosome alterations / transcript fusions that most likely drive the tumour process will be performed via Target Resequencing of the genomic / coding regions of interest.
CCR
Patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Tumor and blood samples will be sequenced at medium-high coverage at the whole genome (exome) and transcriptome levels (RNA Seq). This will allow detecting variants in a larger set of samples even though only from the main clone will be precisely measured. The whole exome will be performed at a mean coverage of at least 60x for the normal DNA samples and 120x for the tumor DNA samples. The transcriptome of the tumor will be performed at enough depth of coverage to detect gene fusions, transcriptome variants and measure the digital expression of already annotated isoforms.

For both sequencing configurations:

  • Data from each cancer and normal genome will be analysed for the presence of somatic variants.
  • DNA and RNA sequencing results will be integrated.
  • Technical replication for the mutations / chromosome alterations / transcript fusions that most likely drive the tumour process will be performed via Target Resequencing of the genomic / coding regions of interest.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delay time to send a validated exome sequencing report from sample receipt
Time Frame: an average of 6 weeks
The time delay between the date of sample receipt by the platform and the date of dispatch of a validated MTB report to physician
an average of 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of patients with samples received by Platform for whom a validated exome sequencing report is available
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Rate of patients for whom a report was transmitted, within the patients for whom the samples were received by the platforms
Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Delay time to send a validated exome sequencing report from signature to informed consent by the patient
Time Frame: an average of 8 weeks
The time delay between the date of informed consent signature and the date of dispatch of a validated MTB report to physician
an average of 8 weeks
The rate of patients with signed informed consent for whom a validated exome sequencing report is available
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Rate of patients for whom a report was transmitted, within the patients for whom signed consent has been signed
Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Delay time to receive sample on Platform from signature of informed consent
Time Frame: on average of 2 weeks
The time delay between the date of informed consent signature and the date of sample receipt on platform
on average of 2 weeks
The rate of patients with signed informed consent for whom samples have been received by platform
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Rate of patients for whom samples have been received by platform, within the patients for whom signed consent has been signed
Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Delay time to receipt nucleic acids on CNRGH from samples receipt on platform
Time Frame: on average of 1 week
The time delay between the date of sample receipt on platform and the date of nucleic acids receipt on CNRGH
on average of 1 week
The rate of patients with samples sending date completed on electronic case for whom samples have been received by platform
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Rate of patients for whom samples have been received by platform, within the patients for whom sending date has been completed on electronic case
Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
The rate of patients with samples received on platform for whom these samples have been qualified in first step by platform and nucleic acids have been received by CNRGH
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Rate of patients for whom samples have been qualified in first step by platform and nucleic acids received by CNRGH, within the patients for whom samples have been received by platform
Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
The rate of patients with samples received on Platform for whom these samples have been qualified in second step by platform and nucleic acids have been received by CNRGH
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Rate of patients for whom samples have been qualified in second step by platform and nucleic acids received by CNRGH, within the patients for whom samples have been received by platform
Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
The rate of patients with samples received on platform for whom these samples have been qualified in first and second step by Platform and nucleic acids have been received by CNRGH
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Rate of patients for whom samples have been qualified in first and second step by platform and nucleic acids received by CNRGH, within the patients for whom samples have been received by platform
Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Delay time to receive all sequencing files from nucleic acids receipt on CNRGH
Time Frame: on average of 3 weeks
The time delay between the date of nucleic acids receipt on CNRGH and the date of receipt of all sequencing files by bioinformatic platform
on average of 3 weeks
The rate of patients with nucleic acids received on CNRGH for whom all sequencing files have been qualified by bioinformatics platform
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Rate of patients for whom all sequencing files have been qualified by bioinformatics platform, within the patients for whom samples have been received by CNRGH
Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
The rate of patients with nucleic acids received on CNRGH for whom sequencing have been qualified by CNRGH
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Rate of patients for whom sequencing have been qualified by CNRGH, within the patients for whom samples have been received by CNRGH
Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Delay time to receive bioinformatics analysis for interpretation from availability of all sequencing files
Time Frame: on average of 1 week
The time delay between the date of receipt of all sequencing files by bioinformatics platform and the date of receipt of bioinformatics analysis by biologist for interpretation
on average of 1 week
The rate of patients with sequencing files received by bioinformatic Platform for whom these files have been qualified for analysis
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Rate of patients for whom all sequencing file have been qualified by bioinformatic platform, within the patients for whom all sequencing file have been received by bioinformatic platform
Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
The rate of patients with sequencing files received by bioinformatic Platform for whom analysis have been transmitted for interpretation
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Rate of patients for whom bioinformatic analysis have been transmitted for interpretation, within the patients for whom all sequencing file have been received by bioinformatic platform
Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Delay time to send a validated exome sequencing report from availability of bioinformatic analysis
Time Frame: on average of 1 week
The time delay between the date of bioinformatic analysis availability for interpretation and the date of dispatch of a validated MTB report to physician
on average of 1 week
The rate of patients with bioinformatic analysis available for interpretation for whom biological interpretation has been performed
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Rate of patients for whom bioinformatic analysis has been interpreted by biologist, within the patients for whom bioinformatics analysis have been transmitted
Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
The rate of patients with bioinformatic analysis available for interpretation for whom results has been discussed by MTB
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months
Rate of patients for whom biological report has been discussed by MTB, within the patients for whom bioinformatics analysis have been transmitted
Throughout the study period, on average of 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 21, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 21, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Clinical Trials on Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): exome, RNA seq

3
Subscribe