Lung and Heart USG for Predicting Weaning in Neurosurgical Patients

July 6, 2018 updated by: Dhritiman Chakrabarti, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, India

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Lung and Heart in Predicting Successful Weaning in Mechanically Ventilated Neurosurgical Patients

Ultrasonography is a commonly used diagnostic and procedural adjunctive modality in intensive care. Weaning of neurosurgical patients off ventilatory support is a critical procedure, fraught with risks of hypoxia and hypercapnia. Weaning involves sequential reduction of ventilatory support and regular assessments for extubation followed by spontaneous breathing trials.

In this study, we evaluate parameters of ultrasonographic evaluation of lung aeration and cardiac function in neurosurgical patients undergoing weaning and their ability to predict successful weaning and extubation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Ultrasonography has become a ubiquitous feature of Intensive care nowadays, with its influence ranging from various diagnostics to various therapeutic interventions. It is readily available at the bedside and is non-invasive, making it an ideal tool in the hands of the intensivist. It has excellent safety profile, and hence can be performed repeatedly. These days it has become an indispensable tool in the intensive care units owing to its potential utility in the process of weaning a critically ill patient from mechanical ventilator support.

A neurosurgical patient is different from any other post-operative or critically ill patients. Their altered cerebral physiology, specific goals of therapy, varied response to usual management protocols, put them in a different league whole together. The primary aim of care for these patients is to detect and prevent any secondary neurological insult while supporting systemic and neurological homeostasis. Hypoxia and hypercarbia are factors which need to be absolutely avoided while caring for such patients. A good proportion of these patients will have respiratory instability, airway compromise and altered sensorium, which makes them prone to hypoxia and hypercarbia. To avoid these secondary insults to the neurological system, endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation is instituted in patients who are at high risk. Mechanical ventilation is continued until the patient is clinically stabilized and primary neurological damage has been taken care of. Subsequently the transition from control ventilation to spontaneous ventilation begins

The weaning process from mechanical ventilation involves sequential reduction of ventilatory parameters, assessment of readiness of the patient for extubation and when all these criterias are acceptable, then finally extubation. Daily, meticulous evaluation of clinical and neurological conditions and completion of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) should be considered in order to recognize and facilitate the process of withdrawal of the mechanical ventilation. Extubation is considered as a success when the ventilator prosthesis is removed after the patient passed the SBT and there is no need for reinstitution of the MV in the next 48 hours. The entire process of weaning can be categorised as a six step process:

  1. Taking care of the primary event
  2. Deciding whether to start weaning
  3. Assessing the readiness to wean
  4. Spontaneous breathing trial (SBT)
  5. Extubation
  6. Assessment of probable reintubation6

Several parameters have been instituted for assessing the capability of weaning. These include: Rapid Shallow Breathing Index, which is the ratio of respiratory frequency to tidal volume (RSBI=f/VT), Pulmonary gas exchange (like: PaO2/FiO2, PaCO2), Vital Capacity (VC), Minute Ventilation and Static Compliance. Weaning may not always have a successful outcome. Difficult weaning may in fact be due to different or mixed etiologies, the diagnosis of which requires meticulous monitoring of various physiologic and objective parameters. Assessment of lung aeration by ultrasonography is rapidly gaining significance in weaning protocol. Apart from lung ultrasonography, the role of transthoracic echocardiography in successfully predicting weaning capability have been investigated in the recent times. Cardiac related weaning failure may be due to systolic LV dysfunction or isolated diastolic dysfunction. By this study we are trying to evaluate the scope of ultrasonography in detection of lung aeration and cardiac systolic and diastolic function in mechanically ventilated neurosurgical patients undergoing weaning; and whether they can be used as a good diagnostic tool to detect those who are likely to fail weaning in this specific subset of patient population.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Karnataka
      • Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560029
        • National Institute of Mental Heath and Neurosciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Neurosurgical patients being mechanically ventilated in ICU, being weaned off mechanical ventilation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. All neurosurgical patients mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hrs and planned for weaning.
  2. All patients whose underlying disease that required intubation was considered reversed or stabilised by the attending physician, rendering them eligible for spontaneous breathing trials.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Uncooperative patient or the absence of a proper ultrasonographic window
  2. Pregnancy
  3. Patients having a GCS score of less than 8
  4. Those having a pre weaning PaO2/ FiO2 ratio of less than 200
  5. Severe ICU acquired neuromyopathy
  6. Patients with lower cranial nerve involvement
  7. Tracheostomised patients
  8. Patients having high spinal cord lesions (above T8)
  9. Presence of thoracostomy, pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum
  10. Presence of rib fractures
  11. Presence of pleural effusion
  12. Patients having severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF < 35%)
  13. Patients with planned prophylactic noninvasive ventilation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
SBT Completers
Those patients who successfully complete a spontaneous breathing trial of 2 hours.
Lung ultrasound and Echocardiography used to derive parameters for prediction of successful SBT.
Other Names:
  • Echocardiography
SBT Non-completers
Those patients who fail to complete a spontaneous breathing trial of 2 hours.
Lung ultrasound and Echocardiography used to derive parameters for prediction of successful SBT.
Other Names:
  • Echocardiography

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Lung Ultrasound Score over the four study time points
Time Frame: Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation

Each intercostal space of upper and lower parts of the anterior, lateral, and posterior regions of the left and right chest wall are carefully examined for four lung aeration patterns:

  1. Normal aeration
  2. Moderate loss of lung aeration
  3. Severe loss of lung aeration
  4. Lung consolidation

For a given region of interest, points are allocated according to the worst ultrasound pattern observed: N = 0, B1 lines = 1, B2 lines = 2, C = 3. The LUS score ranging between 0 and 36 will be calculated as the sum of points.

Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fractional Area Change over the four study time points
Time Frame: Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation
Echocardiographic parameter measuring ventricular systolic function.
Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation
Change in Deceleration time of E over the four study time points
Time Frame: Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation
Echocardiographic parameter measuring ventricular diastolic function.
Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation
Change in E:A Ratio over the four study time points
Time Frame: Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation
Echocardiographic parameter measuring ventricular diastolic function.
Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation
Change in E:E' Ratio over the four study time points
Time Frame: Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation
Echocardiographic parameter measuring ventricular diastolic function.
Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure over the four study time points
Time Frame: Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation
Systolic Blood Pressure
Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure over the four study time points
Time Frame: Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation
Change in Heart Rate over the four study time points
Time Frame: Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation
Heart Rate
Pre-SBT, Half hour during SBT, 2 hours during SBT, Pre-Extubation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IEC(BS & NS DIV)/2017-18

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Extubation

Clinical Trials on Lung Ultrasound

Subscribe