Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Treated With Combined Approach: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes (SPLAC)

April 2, 2026 updated by: CMC Ambroise Paré

Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Treated With Circumferential Arthrodesis Combining Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterolateral Fusion. About 150 Cases

This study aims to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of isthmic spondylolisthesis surgically treated with combined approach. The goal is to demonstrate that it is a safe and efficient technique to treat isthmic spondylolisthesis. There is very little literature concerning this procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Isthmic spondylolisthesis can cause back and leg pain. If pain persists after well conducted medical management, a surgical treatment can be proposed. Even though the goal is consensual, there are plenty of ways to reach vertebral fusion: ALIF, PLIF, TLIF, Posterior fusion only, etc… This study aims to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of isthmic spondylolisthesis surgically treated with combined approach. The goal is to demonstrate that it is a safe and efficient technique to treat isthmic spondylolisthesis using standard XRays, CT Scan and patient reported outcome measurements. There is very little literature concerning this procedure.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

87

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Île-de-France Region
      • Neuilly-sur-Seine, Île-de-France Region, France, 92200
        • CMC Ambroise Paré

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive cohort of patients operated in our center from 2013 to 2017

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients aged over 18 years
  • With isthmic spondylolisthesis at L4-L5 or L5-S1
  • Operated in our center with a double approach: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion then postero-lateral fusion
  • Consent for participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pseudarthrosis L5-S1

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Single cohort of operated patients
One group of patients: isthmic spondylolisthesis operated in our center using a double approach technique
First in supine position, an ALIF is performed: with a Pfannenstiel incision, through a retroperitoneal approach, a discectomy is performed at the level of the spondylolisthesis then a cage is placed between the two vertebral bodies. Then, in prone position, a standard posterior approach is performed, pedicle screws are placed to achieve a postero-lateral fusion. A decompression may be associated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fusion status
Time Frame: From 6 months to 1 year after surgery
Every patient has a CT-Scan of the lumbar spine done to check fusion status. The interpretation is made by the surgeon who did the surgery and one independent reviewer.
From 6 months to 1 year after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Restoration of the foraminal diameter
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year after surgery
The foraminal diameter is measured to quantify the restoration of the foraminal diameter after surgery, making more room for the nerve root.
3 months and 1 year after surgery
Correction of the spondylolisthesis-induced kyphosis after surgery
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year after surgery
The lumbo-sacral angle is measured to quantify the correction of the spondylolisthesis-induced kyphosis after surgery.
3 months and 1 year after surgery
Segmental lordosis
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year after surgery
Segmental lordosis is measured with the L5-S1 lordosis, quantifying the correction at the spondylolisthesis level
3 months and 1 year after surgery
Local Lordosis
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year after surgery
Local Lordosis measured with the L4-S1 lordosis, quantifying the correction in the lower lumbar region
3 months and 1 year after surgery
Back pain
Time Frame: Pre-operative, 3 months and 1 year after surgery
Measured with Lumbar Visual Analogic Scale. The patient quantifies his back pain with a number, ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10= worst possible pain)
Pre-operative, 3 months and 1 year after surgery
Sciatica
Time Frame: Pre-operative, 3 months and 1 year after surgery
Measured with Radicular Visual Analogic Scale. The patient quantifies his leg pain with a number, ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10= worst possible pain)
Pre-operative, 3 months and 1 year after surgery
Disability
Time Frame: Pre-operative, 3 months and 1 year after surgery
Measured with the ODI (Oswestry Disability Index). The patient answers 10 questions concerning his daily life and the disability caused by his back problem, giving a global score. 0 is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible.
Pre-operative, 3 months and 1 year after surgery
Complication rate
Time Frame: until 1 year after surgery
intra-operative, early and late post-operative complications (vascular injury, non-union, infection, etc…)
until 1 year after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 28, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 28, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 28, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Procedure, Unspecified

Subscribe