Epi Off Versus Epi on Corneal Collagen Cross-linking in Keratoconus Patients

July 14, 2018 updated by: Ciro Costagliola, University of Molise

Epi Off Versus Epi on Corneal Collagen Cross-linking in Keratoconus Patients: a Comparative Study Throught 2 Years Follow-up

To evaluate two different techniques of cross linking: standard epithelium off (CXL epi off) versus trans-epithelial (CXL epi on) cross linking in patient with progressive keratoconus.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of the study is to evaluate two different techniques of cross linking: standard epithelium off (CXL epi off) versus trans-epithelial (CXL epi on) cross linking in patient with progressive keratoconus.

Forty eyes from 32 patients with progressive keratoconus were prospectively enrolled from June 2014 to June 2015 in this non-blinded, randomized comparative study. Twenty eyes were treated by CXL epi off and 20 by CLX epi on, randomly assigned and followed for 2 years. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic testing that included uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity, central and peripheral corneal thickness, corneal astigmatism, simulated maximum, minimum, and average keratometry, corneal confocal microscopy, Schirmer I and break-up time (BUT) tests, and the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Intra-and postoperative complications were recorded. The solution used for CXL epi off comprised riboflavin 0.1% and dextran 20.0% (Ricrolin), whereas the solution for CXL epi on (Ricrolin, TE) comprised riboflavin 0.1%, dextran 15.0%, trometamol (Tris), and ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid. Ultraviolet-A treatment was performed with UV-X System at 3 mW/cm2.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 38 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with evolving keratoconus
  • aged between 18 and 40 years
  • no evidence of corneal scarring

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with central and paracentral corneal opacities
  • Vogt's striae
  • previous intraocular surgery
  • history of herpetic keratitis
  • history of severe dry eye
  • concomitant autoimmune diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Epi-on cross-linking
Intervention: Drug: Riboflavin 0.15 in 20% dextran solution
riboflavin 0.1% in 20% dextran solution
riboflavin 0.1% in 15% dextran solution supplemented with tris-hydroxymethylaminomethane and sodium ethylenediminetetraacetic acid
Active Comparator: Epi-off cross-linking
intervention: Drug: Riboflavin 0.15 in 15% dextran solution supplemented with Tris-hydroxymethylaminomethane and sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
riboflavin 0.1% in 20% dextran solution
riboflavin 0.1% in 15% dextran solution supplemented with tris-hydroxymethylaminomethane and sodium ethylenediminetetraacetic acid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best-corrected visual acuity after treatment
Time Frame: up to 48 months from the recruitment
  • Scale name: Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) charts.
  • Scale range 0-1.
  • highest value of the range (corresponding to 20/20): 0
  • lowest value of the range (corresponding to 20/200): 1
up to 48 months from the recruitment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

Data will be made available once the studies results will be published

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Keratoconus

Clinical Trials on administration of riboflavin for epi-off cross-linking

3
Subscribe