- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03599544
Rehabilitation Robotics, Cognitive Skills Training and Function
A Paradigm Sift: Rehabilitation Robotics, Cognitive Skills Training and Function
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Research has shown that robot-assisted therapy can help people regain control of simple reaching or grasping movements, but these improvements don't generalize well to use of the weaker limb during everyday tasks.
This study aims to refine and test a protocol named the Active Learning Program for Stroke (ALPS), which teaches people to use active problem solving strategies and a home program to improve function. Therapist-delivered ALPS instruction may incorporate use of strategies (e.g. STOP, THINK, DO, CHECK) modeled after the Cognitive Orientation for daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach to improve real-world use of the paretic upper limb. We will evaluate whether the combination of robot-assisted therapy and ALPS training leads to better satisfaction and functional use of the weaker arm in persons with motor impairments more than 6 months after stroke, as compared to robot-assisted therapy alone.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
- MGH Institute of Health Professions
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with unilateral stroke more than 6 months prior to study enrollment.
- Stroke type will include both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.
- Moderate UE hemiparesis (characterized by initial scores on upper limb subtest of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) between 19-47/60)
- Intact cognitive function to understand and actively engage in the ALPS robotic therapy procedures (Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score >/=26/30)during the initial evaluation visit
Exclusion Criteria:
- No more than moderate impairments in paretic UE sensation, passive range of motion, and pain that would limit ability to engage in therapy, as indicated by subtests of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) [13]
- Increased muscle tone as indicated by score of >/= 3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale [15];
- Hemispatial neglect or visual field loss measured by the symbol cancellation subtest on the Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test [16]
- Aphasia sufficient to limit comprehension and completion of the treatment protocol
- Currently enrolled or has plans to enroll in other upper limb therapy/research during the study period
- Treatment with Botox injections for the affected arm within the previous 4 months or planned Botox injections before the end of the study
- Contraindications for robot-assisted therapy including recent fracture or skin lesion of paretic UE
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Robot-Assisted Therapy (RT)
Armeo & Amadeo robot-assisted intensive upper limb therapy 1 hour sessions 3x week for 6 weeks.
|
Highly intensive robot-assisted therapy for the paretic arm with the Armeo exoskeleton (1 hour sessions, 3x week for 3 weeks) followed by robot-assisted therapy for hand motions with Amadeo robot (3x week for 3 weeks).
|
|
Experimental: Robot + Active Learning Program(RT-ALPS)
Armeo & Amadeo robot-assisted intensive upper limb therapy 1 hour sessions 3x week for 6 weeks plus training in active problem solving, analysis of performance, and goal-setting focused on the transfer of acquired motor skills to daily activities in the home and community.
|
Highly intensive robot-assisted therapy for the paretic arm with the Armeo exoskeleton (1 hour sessions, 3x week for 3 weeks) followed by robot-assisted therapy for hand motions with Amadeo robot (3x week for 3 weeks).
In addition, participants will receive training in active problem solving, analysis of performance and goal setting focused on home action plan activities to assist with carry-over and generalization to every day activities.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
|
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) will examine changes in motor function in the paretic upper extremity (UE) during basic reaching and grasping motions.
All items are rated by a 3-point ordinal scale (0=cannot perform; 2=performs fully) with a total possible score of 60 points (reflex items will not be administered).
Higher scores indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 6 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Motor Activity Log (MAL) Amount of Use (AOU) at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
|
The Motor Activity Log (MAL) is a self-report measure in which the person is asked to rate their use of the paretic arm and hand during 28 daily activities.
Two scales are used for scoring: Amount of Use (AOU) and Quality of Movement (QOM).
Scores range from 0 to 5 (0=not used at all, 5=as well as before stroke) and the average score for each scale is used to assess upper limb function.
Higher scores indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 6 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Motor Activity Log (MAL) Quality of Movement (QOM) at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
|
The Motor Activity Log (MAL) is a self-report measure in which the person is asked to rate their use of the paretic arm and hand during 28 daily activities.
Two scales are used for scoring: Amount of Use (AOU) and Quality of Movement (QOM).
Scores range from 0 to 5 (0=not used at all, 5=as well as before stroke) and the average score for each scale is used to assess upper limb function.
Higher scores indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 6 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) at 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 weeks
|
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) will examine changes in motor function in the paretic upper extremity (UE) during basic reaching and grasping motions.
All items are rated by a 3-point ordinal scale (0=cannot perform; 2=performs fully) with a total possible score of 60 points (reflex items will not be administered).
Higher scores indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Motor Activity Log (MAL) Amount of Use (AOU) at 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 weeks
|
The Motor Activity Log (MAL) is a self-report measure in which the person is asked to rate their use of the paretic arm and hand during 28 daily activities.
Two scales are used for scoring: Amount of Use (AOU) and Quality of Movement (QOM).
Scores range from 0 to 5 (0=not used at all, 5=as well as before stroke) and the average score for each scale is used to assess upper limb function.
Higher scores indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Motor Activity Log (MAL) Quality of Movement (QOM) at 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 weeks
|
The Motor Activity Log (MAL) is a self-report measure in which the person is asked to rate their use of the paretic arm and hand during 28 daily activities.
Two scales are used for scoring: Amount of Use (AOU) and Quality of Movement (QOM).
Scores range from 0 to 5 (0=not used at all, 5=as well as before stroke) and the average score for each scale is used to assess upper limb function.
Higher scores indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 10 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
|
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) measures velocity-dependent resistance or spasticity during passive range of motion of nine upper limb movements of the weaker arm, using an ordinal scale that ranges from 0 to 4 (0=no increase in muscle tone, 4=affected part rigid in flexion or extension).
Lower scores indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 6 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Time at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
|
The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) quantifies motor ability in the paretic arm and hand during functionally based upper limb tasks.
It consists of 3 parts that are scored separately: timed performance, strength, and an ordinal Functional Ability Scale (FAS).
The FAS is scored by the evaluator post testing on a 6-point ordinal scale from 0 (does not attempt with the involved arm) to 5 (arm does participate; movement appears normal) and timed tasks have a maximum allotted time of 120 seconds.
Higher FAS scores, greater grip strength (measured in kg) and faster time to accomplish tasks indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 6 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Strength (kg) at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
|
The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) quantifies motor ability in the paretic arm and hand during functionally based upper limb tasks.
It consists of 3 parts that are scored separately: timed performance, strength, and an ordinal Functional Ability Scale (FAS).
The FAS is scored by the evaluator post testing on a 6-point ordinal scale from 0 (does not attempt with the involved arm) to 5 (arm does participate; movement appears normal) and timed tasks have a maximum allotted time of 120 seconds.
Higher FAS scores, greater grip strength (measured in kg) and faster time to accomplish tasks indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 6 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Functional Ability Score (FAS) at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
|
The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) quantifies motor ability in the paretic arm and hand during functionally based upper limb tasks.
It consists of 3 parts that are scored separately: timed performance, strength, and an ordinal Functional Ability Scale (FAS).
The FAS is scored by the evaluator post testing on a 6-point ordinal scale from 0 (does not attempt with the involved arm) to 5 (arm does participate; movement appears normal) and timed tasks have a maximum allotted time of 120 seconds.
Higher FAS scores, greater grip strength (measured in kg) and faster time to accomplish tasks indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 6 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
|
The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a self-report measure to assess upper limb performance during valued daily activities.
A Likert scale (Scored from low [1] to high [10]) is used to rate participant performance of selected functional activities.
Higher scores indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 6 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
|
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a disease specific 59-item measure divided into 8 domains: strength, hand function, activities of daily living (ADL)/instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), mobility, communication, emotion, memory and thinking, and participation/role function.
Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert-scale from 1 (unable, extremely difficult) to 5 (not difficult at all).
Higher scores for each domain indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 6 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Confidence in Arm and Hand Movement (CAHM) Scale at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
|
The Confidence in Arm and Hand Movement (CAHM) Scale is a self-report measure of upper limb functional use during a variety of functional tasks (e.g.
cutting food with knife and fork at restaurant, using potholders to remove a hot casserole from the oven).
Participants rate how confident/certain they are that they can successfully complete each task (n=20) on a scale from 0 (very uncertain) to 100 (very certain).
Item scores are averaged to provide a total confidence score (Max score = 100 points).
|
Baseline and 6 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Home-based Accelerometry: Wearable Sensors at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
|
The GENEActiv (http://geneactiv.org)
wearable sensor is a multi-directional, waterproof sensor used to quantitatively measure upper limb activity during every day living situations.
Sensors will be worn on both wrists for 72 hour periods at each assessment point to compare movements of the paretic and intact upper limb during daily activities.
A variety of measures (e.g.
amount of arm use, ratio of use between both arms) will be derived from the raw data collected from the sensors.
|
Baseline and 6 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) at 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 weeks
|
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) measures velocity-dependent resistance or spasticity during passive range of motion of nine upper limb movements of the weaker arm, using an ordinal scale that ranges from 0 to 4 (0=no increase in muscle tone, 4=affected part rigid in flexion or extension).
Lower scores indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Time at 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 weeks
|
The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) quantifies motor ability in the paretic arm and hand during functionally based upper limb tasks.
It consists of 3 parts that are scored separately: timed performance, strength, and an ordinal Functional Ability Scale (FAS).
The FAS is scored by the evaluator post testing on a 6-point ordinal scale from 0 (does not attempt with the involved arm) to 5 (arm does participate; movement appears normal) and timed tasks have a maximum allotted time of 120 seconds.
Higher FAS scores, greater grip strength (measured in kg) and faster time to accomplish tasks indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Strength (kg) at 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 weeks
|
The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) quantifies motor ability in the paretic arm and hand during functionally based upper limb tasks.
It consists of 3 parts that are scored separately: timed performance, strength, and an ordinal Functional Ability Scale (FAS).
The FAS is scored by the evaluator post testing on a 6-point ordinal scale from 0 (does not attempt with the involved arm) to 5 (arm does participate; movement appears normal) and timed tasks have a maximum allotted time of 120 seconds.
Higher FAS scores, greater grip strength (measured in kg) and faster time to accomplish tasks indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Functional Ability Score (FAS) at 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 weeks
|
The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) quantifies motor ability in the paretic arm and hand during functionally based upper limb tasks.
It consists of 3 parts that are scored separately: timed performance, strength, and an ordinal Functional Ability Scale (FAS).
The FAS is scored by the evaluator post testing on a 6-point ordinal scale from 0 (does not attempt with the involved arm) to 5 (arm does participate; movement appears normal) and timed tasks have a maximum allotted time of 120 seconds.
Higher FAS scores, greater grip strength (measured in kg) and faster time to accomplish tasks indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) at 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 weeks
|
The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a self-report measure to assess upper limb performance during valued daily activities.
A Likert scale (Scored from low [1] to high [10]) is used to rate participant performance of selected functional activities.
Higher scores indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) at 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 weeks
|
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a disease specific 59-item measure divided into 8 domains: strength, hand function, activities of daily living (ADL)/instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), mobility, communication, emotion, memory and thinking, and participation/role function.
Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert-scale from 1 (unable, extremely difficult) to 5 (not difficult at all).
Higher scores for each domain indicate better performance.
|
Baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Confidence in Arm and Hand Movement (CAHM) Scale at 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 weeks
|
The Confidence in Arm and Hand Movement (CAHM) Scale is a self-report measure of upper limb functional use during a variety of functional tasks (e.g.
cutting food with knife and fork at restaurant, using potholders to remove a hot casserole from the oven).
Participants rate how confident/certain they are that they can successfully complete each task (n=20) on a scale from 0 (very uncertain) to 100 (very certain).
Item scores are averaged to provide a total confidence score (Max score = 100 points).
|
Baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Home-based Accelerometry: Wearable Sensors at 10 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 weeks
|
The GENEActiv (http://geneactiv.org)
wearable sensor is a multi-directional, waterproof sensor used to quantitatively measure upper limb activity during every day living situations.
Sensors will be worn on both wrists for 72 hour periods at each assessment point to compare movements of the paretic and intact upper limb during daily activities.
A variety of measures (e.g.
amount of arm use, ratio of use between both arms) will be derived from the raw data collected from the sensors.
|
Baseline and 10 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Paolo Bonato, PhD, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018P001182
- AOTFIRG18FASOLI (Other Grant/Funding Number: American Occupational Therapy Foundation)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
Clinical Trials on Robot-Assisted Therapy (RT)
-
Spaulding Rehabilitation HospitalCompleted
-
Swiss Paraplegic Research, NottwilRecruitingCervical Spinal Cord InjurySwitzerland
-
National Taiwan University HospitalUnknownCerebrovascular AccidentTaiwan
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeNational University, Singapore; Agency for Science, Technology and ResearchCompleted
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompleted
-
New York Medical CollegeNew York University; National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication...Not yet recruitingStroke | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Hemiparesis After StrokeUnited States
-
National Taiwan University HospitalUnknown
-
Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences UniversityCompleted
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompleted
-
I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa LuciaUniversità degli studi di Roma Foro ItalicoRecruitingStroke | Stroke, IschemicItaly