Soiled Airway Tracheal Intubation and the Effectiveness of Decontamination by Paramedics (SATIATED)

July 29, 2020 updated by: Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust

Soiled Airway Tracheal Intubation and the Effectiveness of Decontamination by Paramedics (SATIATED): A Randomised Controlled Manikin Study

In more than one-in-five cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, airways are blocked by vomit and blood. Sometimes, paramedics cannot clear the airway using methods they have been taught. If the airway cannot be cleared, the patient will die.

Usually, these patients will have a breathing tube placed into their windpipe (intubation), as this provides protection from vomit and blood. To do this, the paramedic needs to be able to see the entrance to the windpipe.

A new method of clearing the airway called SALAD has been used in patients to help insert a breathing tube, but it is not known whether the method can help paramedics. This study will use a manikin to see if paramedics can insert a breathing tube more often on their first attempt, using SALAD.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

164

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • West Yorkshire
      • Wakefield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom, WF2 0XQ
        • Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be NHS staff who are employed by Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust, and who are Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) registered paramedics.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 and over
  • HCPC registered paramedic employed by Yorkshire Ambulance Service
  • Authorised to intubate within Yorkshire Ambulance Service
  • No SALAD training in the last 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not an HCPC registered paramedic employed by Yorkshire Ambulance Service
  • Not authorised to intubate within Yorkshire Ambulance Service
  • Allergy to artificial 'vomit' ingredients
  • Unwilling to provide consent
  • SALAD training in the last 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Crossover
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in First-pass Intubation Success Rates Before and After SALAD Training
Time Frame: pre- and post-training as part of 2 hour study session
This measure is a comparison of Group AAB's first-pass intubation success rate, using an attempt which occurred before SALAD training, and Group ABB's intubation success rate, using an intubation attempt that occurred after SALAD training.
pre- and post-training as part of 2 hour study session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference Between Mean Time Taken (in Seconds) to Perform a Successful Intubation on the First- Attempt, Before and After SALAD Training Approximately 30 Minutes Apart.
Time Frame: seconds
seconds
Difference in Success Rates Between Participants Who Have Two Post-training Intubation Attempts Versus Participants Who Only Have One Post-training Intubation Attempt
Time Frame: pre- and post-training as part of 2 hour study session
pre- and post-training as part of 2 hour study session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard Pilbery, Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 16, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 3, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • YASRD100
  • 245954 (Other Identifier: IRAS)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vomiting

Clinical Trials on Training in SALAD technique

3
Subscribe