Effect of Different Form of Upper Limb Muscles Training on Dyspnea in COPD (REHABSUP)

January 22, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Brest
Evaluate the effect of upper limbs strength training versus the effect of upper limbs endurance training, on dyspnea, in patients with COPD during a pulmonary rehabilitation program.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

280

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brest, France
        • CHRU de Brest
      • Morlaix, France, 29672
        • CH Pays de Morlaix

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with stage 2 to 4 (A to D) COPD admitted to a pulmonary rehabilitation program (4 weeks)
  • Patient aged 18 or over
  • Patient able to consent and having signed a consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with pain, osteoarthritis or shoulder surgery
  • Patient with a history of Pneumonectomy, lobectomy less than 6 months old
  • Refusal of participation
  • Patient with an inability to complete a pulmonary rehabilitation program in totality
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Patient under tutorship or curatorship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Strength
Patients will follow the pulmonary rehabilitation program associated with upper limbs strength training for a duration of 4 weeks
Upper limbs Strength training; done with dumbbells whose weight corresponds to 60-80% of the maximal voluntary force in abduction measured initially, during 4 weeks
Active Comparator: Endurance
Patients will follow the pulmonary rehabilitation program associated with upper limbs endurance training for a duration of 4 weeks
Upper limbs Endurance training of the ; done with dumbbells whose weight corresponds to 30% of the maximum voluntary force in abduction measured initially, during 4 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the effect of upper limbs strength training versus the effect of upper limb endurance training on dyspnea in patients with COPD during a pulmonary rehabilitation program.
Time Frame: Change from inclusion at 4 week

Measurement of dyspnea using the London Chest Daily Activity Living (LCADL) questionnaire.

This 15-item, self-administered questionnaire allows an evaluation of dyspnea in patients with COPD during daily activities divided into four components: self-care, domestic, physical, and leisure. Patients could score from 0: "I would not do anyway" to 5: "I need someone else to do this". LCADL score is calculated by aggregating the points assigned to each question, with a higher score representing maximal disability.

Change from inclusion at 4 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare dyspnea in daily life between the 2 groups
Time Frame: At inclusion and week 4
Measurement of dyspnea using mMRC scale. mMRC dyspnea scale is the first self-administered scale which assesses the impact of dyspnea on ADL. It consists of five grades increasing in severity of chronic respiratory disease from 0 : "I only get breathless with strenuous exercise" to 4 : "I am too breathless to leave the house or I am breathless when dressing or undressing."
At inclusion and week 4
Compare dyspnea in daily life between the 2 groups
Time Frame: At inclusion and week 4
Measurement of dyspnea using Dyspnea-12 questionnaire. This 12-item self-administered questionnaire measures dyspnea severity in both its physical and affective components, independently from activity limitation. Patients score ranges from "none" (corresponding to score 0) to "severe" (score 3). Dyspnea-12 score is calculated by aggregating the points assigned to each question; the higher the score, the greater the severity.
At inclusion and week 4
Measuring upper limb endurance
Time Frame: At inclusion and week 4
with the 6-minute Peg Board and Ring Test (6PBRT)
At inclusion and week 4
Compare dyspnea at the end of a functional test using the upper limbs
Time Frame: At inclusion and week 4
Measurement of dyspnea with Borg scale at the end of 6PBRT. The measure is a rating on a scale from 0 to 10 attached to different words of appreciation: "very light, difficult, painful ..." effort.
At inclusion and week 4
Compare upper limbs muscle fatigue at the end of a functional test using the upper limbs
Time Frame: At inclusion and week 4
Measurement of upper limbs muscle fatigue with Borg scale at the end of 6PBRT. The measure is a rating on a scale from 0 to 10 attached to different words of appreciation: "very light, difficult, painful ..." effort.
At inclusion and week 4
Compare the evolution of upper limb strength between the 2 groups.
Time Frame: At inclusion and week 4
Measurement of the strength of deltoids, biceps and brachial triceps, with hand held dynamometer
At inclusion and week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc BEAUMONT, PhD, CH des Pays de Morlaix
  • Study Director: Francis COUTURAUD, MD, PhD, CHRU de Brest

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 6, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 6, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REHABSUP (29BRC18.0070)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COPD

Clinical Trials on Strength training

Subscribe