Localization for Deep Lung Nodules: Microcoil Versus Contrast Injection

Preoperative Localization With Microcoil Placement or Contrast Injection for Deep-seated Pulmonary Nodule : A Prospective Randomized Trial

In recent years, the development of low-dose pulmonary computed tomography screening has led to the discovery of many small pulmonary nodules in the early stages.

Surgical resection is still the main treatment for those suspected malignant lesions. In the face of such small pulmonary nodules, accurate preoperative localization has become the key to successful resection, and the deep-seated nodules are the most challenging parts. Because the deep-seated nodules cannot be localized by surface dye injection, however, it is necessary to place a fiducial marker (such as a microcoil) or contrast medium injection in combination with intraoperative fluoroscopy to ensure adequate resection of the deep-seated nodules. . This study will be carried out at the Hsinchu Branch of National Taiwan University Hospital. It is expected that 60 patients with pulmonary nodules with a depth larger than 2 cm will be randomly assigned into two groups. One group will receive microcoil placement, and the other group will receive contrast medium injection. The primary goal of the study was to compare the localization duration of the two groups of patients, the total dose of radiation exposure during localization and the incidence of location-related complications, and the secondary goals were the results of the surgical procedure, including the surgical duration.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hsin-Chu County
      • Taipei, Hsin-Chu County, Taiwan, 30059
        • Recruiting
        • National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Deep lung lesions

Exclusion Criteria:

Emphysema COPD Previous ilpislateral surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Microcoil
Needle localization for deep-seated lung nodules with microcoil placement
Needle localization with microcoil
Active Comparator: Contrast
Needle localization for deep-seated lung nodules with contrast injection
Needle localization with contrast injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure success rate
Time Frame: 1 day
Procedure success is defined as marking (lipiodol or hook-wire) the GGO lesion within 1 cm without pleural leakage of lipiodol or dislodgement of the hook-wire. The procedure success rate is calculated as follows: procedure success rate (%) = (number of procedure success / number of total procedure) × 100.
1 day
Successful localization for surgery
Time Frame: 1 day
Localization contribute to surgery
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure-related complication rate
Time Frame: 1 day
Incidence of complications during needle procedure, The procedure-related complication rate is calculated as follows: procedure-related complication rate (%) = (number of procedure-related complication / number of total procedure) × 100.
1 day
Duration of the localization procedure
Time Frame: 1 day
From start of needle procedure to withdraw of the needle (minutes)
1 day
Duration of wedge resection
Time Frame: 1 day
From start of surgery to completion of pulmonary wedge resection (minutes)
1 day
Surgical margin of wedge resection
Time Frame: 1 day
Distance from pulmonary lesion to resection margin of the specimen
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 107-032-F

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Microcoil

3
Subscribe