An Evaluation Of Healthy Ankle Motion And Morphology

June 16, 2021 updated by: Paragon 28

An Evaluation Of Healthy Ankle Motion And Morphology In Different Phases Of Simulated Gait Using A Weight-bearing CBCT Scan

Determine motion and morphology of the healthy ankle during simulated gait.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Healthy volunteers will undergo weight-bearing, cone beam CT scans of their foot/ankle during 3 phases of simulated gait. Motion and morphology of the foot and ankle will be quantified and analyzed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Atlantis, Florida, United States, 33462
        • Orthopedic Center of Palm Beach County

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Volunteers who have a healthy ankle

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject self-reports having a right healthy ankle.
  2. The subject agrees to comply with the requirements of the study and complete the study measures.
  3. The subject is between the ages of 18 and 65.
  4. The subject is willing to provided written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject is pregnant.
  2. The subject reports having been diagnosed with any form of diabetes.
  3. The subject reports having surgery on the right foot, right ankle and/or right knee.
  4. The subject reports a history of repeated ankle sprains or injuries to the right ankle.
  5. The subject reports a history of instability of the right ankle.
  6. The subject reports chronic or recurring pain of the right ankle.
  7. The subject is: a prisoner, unable to understand what participation in the study entails, mentally incompetent, and/or known abuser of alcohol and/or drugs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Healthy
Subjects identified to have a healthy foot/ankle
Computer tomography (CT) of the foot/ankle for determination of motion and morphology
Standard radiographs of the foot/ankle as part of the screening criteria

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relative rotations of bones
Time Frame: 1 day
Determine relative tri-axial rotations between bones of the foot and ankle using reconstructed 3-dimensional computer models. All rotations will be measured in degrees (°).
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relative translations of bones
Time Frame: 1 day
Determine relative multi-directional translation between bones of the foot and ankle using reconstructed 3-dimensional computer models. All translations will be measured in mm.
1 day
Morphology - size and shape of the bones of the foot and ankle
Time Frame: 1 day
Evaluate the size and shape of the bones of the foot and ankle using reconstructed 3-dimensional computer models relative to height, weight, body mass index and gender. All distances will be measured in mm.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James Clancy, DPM, Orthopedic Center of Palm Beach County

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 16, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P10-SP-0001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Ankle

Clinical Trials on Cone Beam Computed Tomography

3
Subscribe