Assessment of the Morphological Concordance Between CT and Cone Beam in Sinus Imagery (COSINUS)

October 24, 2016 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse
This study compares the morphological concordance between CT (computed tomography) and cone beam in sinus on 26 validated items. CT and cone beam is performed on each patient. Performances of these two imagery technics seem to be closed. Nevertheless, the exposure of the ionizing radiations is lower with the cone beam.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • VERGEZ

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • man or woman older than 18 years old
  • patient affected by sinonasal pathology : who show one or more of the following functional sign : anosmia, pain with sinusal origin (frontal headache, lower-orbital throbbing pain increased in anteflexion, chronic unexplained headache), nasal blockage, runny nose, epistaxis requiring the realisation of a sinus imagery overview.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Deprivation of liberty by administrative or legal decision
  • patients under 18 years old
  • Patients in emergency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: patients with sinonasal pathology
Computed Tomography Cone Beam Computed Tomography
imagery with ionizing radiation
imagery with ionizing radiation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intraclass correlation coefficient
Time Frame: 1 day
Assessment of the morphological concordance between the CT and the Cone Beam in the sinus imagery with 26 validated items.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
morphological concordance between cone beam and CT
Time Frame: 1 day
Assessment of the morphological concordance between the CT and the Cone Beam in the sinus imagery with these 26 items assessed separately
1 day
reproductibility INTER-OBSERVER
Time Frame: 1 day
The reproducibility of the measurement between the two neuroradiologists will be assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient, based on 26 benchmarks of primary endpoint. Similarly inter-observer reproducibility will be assessed for the 36 specific criteria
1 day
dosimetry
Time Frame: 1 day
Assessment of the dosimetry CT/ Cone Beam
1 day
Diagnosis concordance radio-endoscopic and radio-surgical
Time Frame: 1 day
Radio-endoscopic surgical concordance and radio will be estimated by calculating the proportion of concordant diagnoses between the radiological evaluation and cone beam scanner and endoscopic evaluation obtained at the first nasal endoscopy and radiological evaluation between the scanner and cone beam and intraoperative assessment in case of surgery. The investigators then compare the radio-endoscopic surgical concordance and radio and the cone beam scanner.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sebastien VERGEZ, PhD, University Hospital, Toulouse

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 26, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 13 147 03
  • 2013-A00736-39 (Registry Identifier: ANSM)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sinonasal Pathologies

Clinical Trials on Computed Tomography

3
Subscribe