Novel Arm Restraint in the Intensive Care Unit

May 9, 2025 updated by: Renee Stapleton, University of Vermont

Pilot Study of a Novel Arm Restraint For Critically Ill Patients

The goal of this pilot is to evaluate a novel restraint device in 8 older mechanically ventilated patients to demonstrate that 1) the revised novel restraint prototype is safe and 2) a future randomized controlled trial (RCT) is feasible.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The goal of this Fast-Track Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) project is to optimize and test a novel arm restraint in older critically ill mechanically ventilated patients that may increase mobility; reduce agitation, use of sedative medications, and delirium; and exhibit high satisfaction and acceptability among hospital staff, family members, and patients. Older mechanically ventilated patients are often immobilized with wrist restraints to prevent self-extubation and are sedated to reduce agitation caused by their restraints and endotracheal (breathing) tube. This sedation and immobility lead to complications, including delirium and muscle weakness, that are independently associated with long term cognitive impairment, reduced physical functioning, and mortality. Specifically, the incidence and duration of delirium in the ICU are strongly and independently associated with long-term cognitive impairment that is similar to Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.

Healthy Design has developed a novel restraint device that allows arm mobility but prohibits hands from reaching oral/nasal endotracheal and feeding tubes or intravenous lines. Because it permits mobility, the novel restraint may reduce agitation and the need for sedatives. The objectives of this pilot study are to evaluate the novel restraint in 8 older mechanically ventilated patients to demonstrate that 1) the revised novel restraint prototype is safe and 2) a future RCT is feasible.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, United States, 05405
        • University of Vermont College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. >65 years old
  2. Physician order for use of bilateral wrist restraints
  3. Requiring mechanical ventilation with actual or expected total duration of >48 hours
  4. Expected ICU stay >3 days after enrollment (to permit adequate exposure to proposed intervention)
  5. Not deeply sedated (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale [RASS] score > -2)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Upper extremity impairments that prevent use of novel restraint device (e.g. amputation, arm injury)
  2. Limited mobility of either upper extremity prior to admission (e.g. frozen shoulder, severe arthritis)
  3. Pre-existing primary systemic neuromuscular disease (e.g. Guillain-Barre)
  4. Neuromuscular blocker infusion (eligible once infusion discontinued if other inclusion criteria met)
  5. Pre-existing severe cognitive impairment or language barrier prohibiting outcome assessment
  6. Expected death or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments within 6 days from enrollment
  7. Incarcerated
  8. Severe skin breakdown on either upper extremity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Novel restraint first, then traditional restraint
Participants will be randomized to wear the novel arm restraint bilaterally for 4 hours on study day #1, followed by traditional soft bilateral wrist restraints for 4 hours. Then, on study day #2, they will wear both kinds of restraints in the opposite order.
Use of a novel arm restraint
Experimental: Traditional restraint first, then novel restraint
Participants will be randomized to wear traditional soft bilateral wrist restraints for 4 hours on study day #1, followed by the novel arm restraint bilaterally for 4 hours. Then, on study day #2, they will wear both kinds of restraints in the opposite order.
Use of a novel arm restraint

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Treatment-Emergent Severe Adverse Events [Safety]
Time Frame: Through study day 2
Safety will be measured by the number (i.e. < 1 in 5 participants had a treatment emergent safety event per their on study time) across all of the following measures listed below. Incidence does not have to be per person-year; in this case it is incidence of safety adverse event during the study period.
Through study day 2
Number of Clinician or Patient Lacerations
Time Frame: Through study day 2
Grade 2b or higher skin laceration (per Skin Tear Audit Research [STAR] Skin Tear Classification System) in patient or clinician from any sharp edges of device. The STAR grading system ranges from grade 1a at best to 3 at worst. Each laceration is given an individual score based on appearance.
Through study day 2
Number of Pressure Ulcers From Device
Time Frame: Through study day 2
Development of pressure ulcer from device of Stage 3 or greater per 2016 National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Stages. This staging system provides an individual score to each pressure ulcer based on appearance from stage 1 (best) to stage 4 (worst)
Through study day 2
Number of Self-removals of Novel Restraint
Time Frame: Through study day 2
Self-removal of novel restraint
Through study day 2
Number of Damaging Events to Hospital Bed Rendering it Non-functional
Time Frame: Through study day 2
Any damage to hospital bed from restraint device rendering it non-functional
Through study day 2
Number of Damaging Events to ICU Equipment
Time Frame: Through study day 2
Any damage to ICU equipment (e.g. ventilator) rendering it non-functional
Through study day 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Self-extubations
Time Frame: Through study day 2
Will record instances where participants remove own endotracheal tube
Through study day 2
Number of Movements of Upper Extremities
Time Frame: Continuously through study day 2
Actigraphy counts of upper extremities as measured by Philliips actigraph, a device that records individual movements
Continuously through study day 2
Richmond Agitation Sedation Score [RASS]
Time Frame: Median of multiple RASS scores collected over first 2 days of study period
Agitation measured by the median of Richmond agitation sedation score [RASS] collected longitudinally every hour while wearing restraints. This score measures sedation and agitation from a scale of -5 (most sedated) to +4 (most agitated)
Median of multiple RASS scores collected over first 2 days of study period
Satisfaction With Novel Device as Assessed by the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST) Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: Study day 2
Satisfaction with the novel restraint device will be measured with the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST) satisfaction tool. This 12-item questionnaire is scored from 1 (lowest satisfaction) to 5 (highest satisfaction).
Study day 2
Delerium Score
Time Frame: 6-day study period
We intended to measure delirium score as accessed by the CAM-ICU. However, during the study we were unable to measure it because it was too often incorrectly charted by nursing. We therefore have nothing to report for this planned outcome.
6-day study period

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enrolling Adequate Numbers of Patients
Time Frame: 6-day study period
Number of participants enrolled in the study
6-day study period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 11, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 18-0353-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Novel restraint

Subscribe