Symptom Perception

May 4, 2023 updated by: Juan P Wisnivesky, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Symptom Perception, Behavior, and Outcomes in Older Asthmatics

Older asthmatics have considerably worse outcomes than younger patients with asthma. In this study, the investigators will evaluate the role of symptom perception as a key determinant of poorer outcomes and lower adherence to asthma self-management behaviors among older asthmatics. The proposed study is significant for its potential to greatly advance understanding of the mechanisms related to worse outcomes in older adults, and it will provide actionable data for new interventions to improve self-management.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Asthma is a common condition in the older population and associated with worse morbidity and mortality compared to younger individuals. Various self-management behaviors (SMB), medication adherence in particular, are key for achieving good asthma control. Unfortunately, less than half of older asthmatics regularly adhere to their controller medications and to other SMB. Several observations suggest that symptom perception may be a major determinant of asthma SMB and outcomes in older adults. First, experimental studies consistently demonstrate that many older adults are substantially less aware of their level of airway obstruction. Second, under-perception of asthma symptoms is linked to elevated risk of near-fatal and fatal asthma attacks and increased morbidity among younger adults. Third, cognitive impairment, commonly associated with aging, has been identified as a key determinant of under-perception of symptoms in younger asthmatics. Fourth, interventions to correct symptom under-perception in children have been shown to improve asthma medication adherence. Despite the greater vulnerability of older asthmatics to poor asthma outcomes and their diminished ability to perceive the severity of their airway obstruction, the association of symptom perception with asthma SMB and outcomes has not been studied in this population. The goal of this project is to determine how symptom perception influences the management and outcomes of older asthmatics and to pilot test an intervention to correct under-perception. The Specific Aims are: 1) Prospectively assess the association between symptom perception and asthma morbidity among older adults; 2) Examine the association between symptom perception and asthma SMB among older adults and identify the pathways (via illness and medication beliefs) linking them; 3) Determine the influence of cognition on symptom perception among older adults with asthma; 4) Pilot test an intervention to correct under-perceptions of asthma symptoms in older adults. The investigators will conduct a prospective cohort study of 400 asthmatics ≥60 years of age recruited from East Harlem and the Bronx in New York City. The investigators will measure symptom perception in naturalistic settings using an innovative and validated methodology and repeatedly collect data on illness and medication beliefs, cognitive functioning, SMB (including objective measures of medication adherence), and asthma morbidity over 12 months. At the end of the observation period, the investigators will pilot test an intervention to improve symptom perception on a random sample of 80 participants. The proposed study is significant for its potential to greatly advance understanding of the mechanisms related to low adherence to SMB and worse outcomes in older asthmatics, a vulnerable and understudied population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Jacobi Medical Center
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Yeshiva University
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • ICAHN School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥60 years
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • Asthma diagnosis made by a health care provider

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of dementia
  • Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or other chronic respiratory illness
  • Smoking history of ≥15 pack-years owing to possible undiagnosed COPD
  • Moderate or severe cardiac disease (including New York Heart Association stages 4 or 5 congestive heart failure, because dyspnea among patients with severe heart failure is more likely to be attributable to their heart condition than their asthma)
  • Dependence on assistance for medication administration
  • Uncorrectable visual impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Asthma education and PEF feedback
Patients receive asthma education and personal Peak expiratory flow (PEF) feedback
Patients in the PEF feedback arm will receive a one-time session including asthma management education, discussion of their asthma symptoms, review of individual PEF results and perception of symptoms, and problem-solving techniques to improve asthma self-management. After the session, the participants in this arm will be able to view in the display of the AM2 device their PEF values and will be instructed to mentally note their actual results with their pre-effort estimated BPF. They will also set a motivational message for themselves that will appear on the device.
Other Names:
  • Intervention Arm
Placebo Comparator: Asthma education
No PEF feedback arm
General asthma education, AM2 training, and positive counseling, but no discussion linking asthma symptom perception to SMB. Following the session, these participants will use the AM2 to track PEF actual and perceived values twice per day, but they will be blinded to the actual PEF values. Control arm patients will see a standard motivational message appear on the screen of the AM2 device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
Change in self-reported asthma control validated survey, with a total score range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating severely uncontrolled asthma , used to assess current asthma control at pre-intervention, 1week post-pilot follow up visit and 4 weeks post-pilot follow-up visit
Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
Change in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
Change in self-reported asthma-related quality of life validated survey used to assess asthma-related quality of life at at pre-intervention, 1week post-pilot follow up visit and 4 weeks post-pilot follow-up visit. Total Score from 1-7, with higher score indicating better quality of life.
Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
MARS is a self-reported questionnaire with the total score range from 0-10 with a higher score indicating better adherence.
Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
Change in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
10-item scale that measures beliefs about asthma controller medication in 2 subdomains: necessity and concerns. All items have a five-point Likert answer option, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree, with total range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicate stronger beliefs about the corresponding concepts.
Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
Change in Beliefs About Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up
The BIPQ includes 9 items designed to rapidly assess the cognitive and emotional representations of illness- consequences, timeline, personal control, treatment control, experience symptoms, concerns, emotions and comprehensibility. For analyses, the first 8 items are summed and item 9 which is part of the causal scale is excluded. Items for personal control, treatment control and comprehensibility were reverse coded. All of the 8 items, are rated using a 0 (none) to 10 (extreme) response scale giving a sum total score of 0-80. Higher total scores indicate worse asthma perception.
Baseline, 1 week follow up
Symptom Perception Measures Adjusted
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
Assessed based on alignment of patient guesses and actual PEF values recorded by the AM2 device and then categorizing into accurate, under or over-perception, adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income Assesses if training and feedback can improve under perception of airflow obstruction and lead to better control in older adults with asthma
Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score - Adjusted
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
Change in self-reported asthma control validated survey, with a total score range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating severely uncontrolled asthma, used to assess current asthma control at pre-intervention, 1week post-pilot follow up visit and 4 weeks post-pilot follow-up visit adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income
Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
Treatment Credibility
Time Frame: 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up

Treatment Credibility adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income

The credibility of a treatment rationale consists of "how believable, convincing, and logical the treatment is". The CEQ credibility factor, reflecting a cognitively-based process, is based on patients' summed responses to three items measuring how logical the therapy seems, how successful one thinks it will be in reducing symptoms, and how confident one would be in recommending it to a friend with similar symptoms. The modified version used in this study included items rated on 7 point scales ranging from 1 (Not at all logical/successful /confident) to 7 (Very logical/successful /confident), with a total score possible range of 3 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher treatment credibility.

1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
Treatment Expectancy
Time Frame: 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up

Treatment Expectancy adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income.

Outcome expectancy consists of patients' beliefs about how likely they are to benefit from a treatment.

The CEQ expectancy factor, reflecting an affectively-based process, is based on patients' responses to three items reflecting how much they think they will improve by the end of treatment, how much they feel therapy will help reduce their symptoms, and how much they feel they will improve by the end of treatment. Because one item is on the same 7-point scale as the credibility items and two are assessed on an 11-point scale (from 0% to 100% in 10-point increments), responses are first standardized before summing to render the expectancy total score. The total score possible range is 3 to 33. Higher scores indicate higher treatment expectancy.

1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
Change in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) Adjusted
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up
MARS is a self-reported questionnaire with the total score range from 0-10 with a higher score indicating better adherence. MARS, adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income
Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on PEF Feedback

Subscribe