COMPARATIVE PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF COMPLICATIONS FOUND IN THE PINS OF EXTERNAL FIXERS COMPARING STEEL PINS AND PINS COATED WITH HYDROXIAPATITA

COMPARATIVE PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF SURFACE AND DEEP COMPLICATIONS FOUND IN THE PINS OF EXTERNAL FIXERS COMPARING STEEL PINS AND PINS COATED WITH HYDROXIAPATITA

The present study is a prospective non-randomized and comparative study of patients undergoing surgical treatment with external fixators of any type, between May 2018 and May 2020, in the city of Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil, in the São Vicente de Paulo hospitals. A study in which we compared infection rates, pin loosening and complications found in external fixators made with hydroxyapatite coated pins and uncoated steel pins.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

We will use as a guide to define the degree of infection and the conduct to be taken in the classification of Mas Oxford Nuffield (Table 3), therefore the presence of infection occurring in patients classified as Grade 2 - erythema of the skin, serous or purulent secretion, pain and sensitivity in soft tissues capable of mobilizing with analgesia. We will also send to the culture the tip of two pins removed from each patient to evaluate possible colonization and to compare with the degree of classification presented in the pin in question, we will do this with a pin without signal of infection and with the pin with the highest degree of classification presented in each patient at the time of the external fixator removal.

We will use as a method of insertion of the pin the pre-perforation irrigated before the insertion of the pins, to decrease the chances of thermal necrosis and consequent release or infection. We will use steel Shanz pins coated with hydroxyapatite or not in size between 5-6mm. Comorbidities and risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, smoking, immunodepression, among others, will be computed for later comparison with the data collected. The degree of classification of the fractures, as well as the pathologies that were treated with the fixators, as well as the residence time with the external fixator will also be computed for later comparison with the data collected.

For the elaboration of this study, the patients will be prospectively observed, which will be submitted to the treatment of several pathologies with external fixators, of any type. The occurrence of infection and / or loosening of the pins, as well as the influence of risk factors and the cultural examination results of the pins removed at the end of the treatment will be recorded. The objectives of the study are to comparatively evaluate the differences in complications of infection, pin loosening and microbiological results of cultural examinations, between patients submitted to external fixators with uncoated steel pins and steel pins coated with hydroxyapatite. The influence of risk factors on outcomes will also be observed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

119

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Passo Fundo, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 99010-080

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who underwent surgical treatment with external fixators for at least 2 weeks, regardless of age, gender and comorbidities.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • We will select for the study patients who agree to participate, signing the commitment term for data use, and who underwent surgical treatment with external fixation of any type both for fracture treatment and correction of deformities, treatment of osteomyelitis and or pseudoarthrosis , for a minimum period of 2 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • We will exclude patients who do not agree to participate in the study, patients who have had external fixation for less than 2 weeks, and patients in whom we have lost follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
hydroxyapatite coated pins
Patients submitted to surgical treatment with external fixators using pins coated with hydroxyapatite.
uncoated steel pins
Patients submitted to surgical treatment with external fixators using uncoated steel pins.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
compare infectious complications
Time Frame: April 2018 and December 2019
To compare superficial and deep infectious complications associated with the presence of external fixation pins. To evaluate the incidence and degree of infection at pin insertion sites, osteomyelitis and wound infection, comparatively between hydroxyapatite and uncoated pins.
April 2018 and December 2019
Evaluate the incidence of loosening of the pins
Time Frame: April 2018 and December 2019
To evaluate the incidence of pin loosening, comparatively between pins coated with hydroxyapatite and uncoated pins, in the external fixators.
April 2018 and December 2019

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
risk factors and comorbities associated
Time Frame: April 2018 and December 2019
To evaluate the risk factors and comorbidities associated with infectious complications and pin loosening in the patients participating in the study
April 2018 and December 2019

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 14, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 25, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 84939418.6.0000.5342

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on External Fixation Pin Site Infection

3
Subscribe