A Multidimensional Strategy to Improve Quality of Life of Patients With Multiple Symptoms and Palliative Care Needs (MuSt-PC)

April 17, 2024 updated by: University Medical Center Groningen
A nationwide, cross-sectional study, to determine the prevalence of symptoms of patients in the palliative phase in various care settings will be performed within a set period of two weeks in September 2018 and two weeks in November 2018. The participating settings will be selected by a total of seven coordinators, one for each consortium of palliative care in the Netherlands. To identify common combinations of symptoms and for multidimensional screening the Utrecht Symptom Diary-4 Dimensional (USD-4D) and Utrecht Symptom Diary (USD), a Dutch instrument based on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, will be used. The current protocol focuses on the cross-sectional study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The Utrecht Symptom Diary-4 dimensional (USD-4D), a Dutch instrument based on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, will be used for multidimensional screening and assessment of intensity and prevalence of symptoms. The questionnaire assesses twelve symptoms: pain, sleeping problems, dry mouth, dysphagia, anorexia, constipation, nausea, dyspnoea, fatigue, anxiety, depressed mood and confusion. This is measured on a numeric scale from 0 (no complaints) to 10 (worst imaginable or intolerable).

The prevalence of symptoms will be described by frequencies, dichotomizing symptom scores in absent (0 on NRS) or present (1 or higher on NRS). Symptom scores of 4 or higher on NRS are considered clinically relevant.

There is a possibility to add two more complaints not enlisted and to prioritise the problems which should be addressed first by the HCP.

Quality of life is assessed using a (un)well-being measure and the opportunity to score the experienced value of life.

Finally, five multidimensional questions will screen for mental capacity ("draagkracht"), the relationship with loved ones and thoughts concerning end of life. These multidimensional questions will be filled out together with the HCP. Therefore the HCP decides beforehand whether those questions will be asked.

The USD-4D will be filled out only once by participating patients without follow-up. The patients will be asked to fill out the following characteristics: age, gender, education level, cultural background, living situation, underlying disease, comorbidities, performance score, medication groups and interventions.

The estimated time to fill out both questionnaires is fifteen to twenty-five minutes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

659

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ
        • University Medical Center Groningen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients in various settings will be included (GP practices, home care facilities, general and academic hospitals, hospices) and with any underlying life-limiting disease

Description

Patient selection will be performed by health care providers in the participating settings.

Inclusion Criterium:

• Patients of whom the health care professional answers "no" to the question "Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months ?".

Exclusion Criterium:

•Patients unable or unwilling to self-assess their symptoms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients in the palliative stage
Adult patients in various settings will be included (General Practioners practices, home care facilities, general and academic hospitals, hospices) and with any underlying life-limiting disease.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of multiple, simultaneously occurring symptoms
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Prevalence of multiple, simultaneously occurring symptoms (symptom clusters) in patients in the palliative phase in Dutch care settings (GP practices, home care facilities, general and academic hospitals, hospices).
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of each separate symptom
Time Frame: 4 weeks
For each symptom assessed (pain, sleeping problems, dry mouth, dysphagia, anorexia, constipation, nausea, dyspnoea, fatigue, anxiety, depressed mood and confusion) we will ask patients to score how they feel. In a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), patients are asked to circle the number between 0 and 10 that fits best to their experienced intensity of complaints. Zero represents 'no complaint at all' whereas the upper limit represents 'the worst (pain, nausea, etc.) ever possible'.
4 weeks
Clinically relevant symptoms
Time Frame: 4 weeks
For each symptom assessed (pain, sleeping problems, dry mouth, dysphagia, anorexia, constipation, nausea, dyspnoea, fatigue, anxiety, depressed mood and confusion) we will ask patients to score how they feel. In a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), patients are asked to circle the number between 0 and 10 that fits best to their experienced intensity of complaints. Zero represents 'no complaint at all' whereas the upper limit represents 'the worst (pain, nausea, etc.) ever possible'. All scores of 4 and higher are considered clinically relevant.
4 weeks
Quality of life (single question with numeric rating scale)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Opportunity to score the experienced quality of life with the question: "how do you feel at this moment?". In a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), patients are asked to circle the number between 0 and 10 that fits best to their wellbeing. Zero represents 'feeling very well' whereas the upper limit (10)represents 'feeling very bad'.
4 weeks
Symptom burden (multidimensional questions of Utrecht Symptom Diary-4Dimensional)
Time Frame: 4 weeks

Five multidimensional theses will screen for mental capacity, the relationship with loved ones and thoughts concerning end of life. The following theses are presented:

  • I have the chance to be myself
  • I can bear what happens to me
  • I can let go of my loved ones
  • I am living a balanced life
  • Thoughts at the end of life gives me peace of mind

In a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), patients are asked to circle the number between 0 and 10 that fits best to their experienced feeling. Zero represents 'totally agree' whereas the upper limit represents 'totally disagree'. These values will be descriptive, a higher or lower value is not necessarily a better or worse outcome.

4 weeks
Symptoms per care setting
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Number of participants with assessed complaints (pain, sleeping problems, dry mouth, dysphagia, anorexia, constipation, nausea, dyspnoea, fatigue, anxiety, depressed mood and confusion) per care setting (general practitioners practices, home care facilities, general and academic hospitals, hospices)
4 weeks
Symptoms per underlying disease
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Number of participants with assessed complaints (pain, sleeping problems, dry mouth, dysphagia, anorexia, constipation, nausea, dyspnoea, fatigue, anxiety, depressed mood and confusion) per underlying disease (most probably incurable cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure and end-stage renal disease).
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: An KL Reyners, MD, PhD, University Medical Center Groningen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 201800366

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Palliative Medicine

Subscribe