Management and Outcomes of Congenital Anomalies in Low-, Middle- and High-Income Countries

February 21, 2020 updated by: Miss Naomi Wright, King's College London

Management and Outcomes of Congenital Anomalies in Low-, Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Multi-Centre, International, Prospective Cohort Study

This study is a multi-centre, international, prospective cohort study of congenital anomalies to compare outcomes between LMICs and high-income countries (HICs) globally.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Congenital anomalies have risen to become the 5th leading cause of death in children under 5-years of age globally, yet limited literature exists, particularly from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where most of these deaths occur.

Aim: To undertake a multi-centre prospective cohort study of congenital anomalies to compare outcomes between LMICs and high-income countries (HICs) globally.

Methods: The Global PaedSurg Research Collaboration will be established consisting of children's surgical care providers from around the world to participate in the study; collaborators will be co-authors of resulting presentations and publication(s). Data will be collected on patients presenting primarily with seven congenital anomalies (oesophageal atresia, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, intestinal atresia, gastroschisis, exomphalos, anorectal malformation and Hirschsprung's disease) for a minimum of one month between Oct 2018 - April 2019. Anonymous data will be collected on patient demographics, clinical status, interventions and outcome. Data will be captured using the secure, online data collection tool REDCap.

The primary outcome will be all-cause in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcomes will be occurrence of post-operative complications. Chi-squared analysis will be used to compare mortality between LMICs and HICs. Multilevel, multivariate logistic regression analysis will be undertaken to identify patient level and hospital level factors affecting outcomes with adjustment for confounding factors. P<0.05 will be deemed significant. Study approval will be sought from all participating centres. Funding has been granted by the Wellcome Trust.

Outcomes: The study aims to be the first large-scale, geographically comprehensive, multi-centre prospective cohort study of a selection of common congenital anomalies to define current management and outcomes globally. Results will be used to aid advocacy and global health prioritisation and inform future interventional studies aimed at improving outcomes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3850

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 16 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Neonates, infants and children up to 16-years of age presenting for the first time with one of the seven congenital anomalies in the study to institutions in low-, middle- and high-income countries globally.

All institutions that provide surgical care for the patients being studied can contribute data. Participating institutions will be recruited through convenience sampling with snowballing.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any neonate, infant or child under the age of 16-years, presenting for the first time, with one of the study conditions can be included in the study.
  • Children who have NOT previously received any surgery for their condition.
  • Children who have received basic resuscitative and supportive care for their condition at a different healthcare facility and then been transferred to the study centre.
  • Patients presenting primarily with one of the study conditions who receive palliative care or no care must be included within the study to reflect true outcomes.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any neonate, infant or child with one of the study conditions who has previously received surgery (including a stoma) for their condition
  • If they have recently received surgery for their condition, were discharged and then represented with a complication of the surgery during the study period they should NOT be included in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Oesophageal atresia (OA) +/- tracheo-oesophageal fistula (TOF)
Countries will be defined as low, middle or high-income using the World Bank classification.
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH)
Countries will be defined as low, middle or high-income using the World Bank classification.
Intestinal atresia (IA)
Countries will be defined as low, middle or high-income using the World Bank classification.
Gastroschisis
Countries will be defined as low, middle or high-income using the World Bank classification.
Exomphalos
Countries will be defined as low, middle or high-income using the World Bank classification.
Anorectal malformation (ARM)
Countries will be defined as low, middle or high-income using the World Bank classification.
Hirschsprung's disease
Countries will be defined as low, middle or high-income using the World Bank classification.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause, in-hospital mortality
Time Frame: Mortality whilst in hospital during primary admission, up to a maximum of 30-days following primary intervention or 30-days following presentation for those who do not receive an intervention and are still in hospital.

This will include all patients in the study, both those who did not receive an intervention and those that did.

For patient's hospitalised for over 30-days following primary intervention, a 30-day post-primary intervention mortality rate will be utilised.

For patients who do not receive a primary intervention (conservative generic ward care only) but remain alive and hospitalised at 30-days following primary admission will have this time point used for recording their mortality status for the primary outcome.

Mortality whilst in hospital during primary admission, up to a maximum of 30-days following primary intervention or 30-days following presentation for those who do not receive an intervention and are still in hospital.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical site-infection
Time Frame: Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention

This is defined by the Centre for Disease Control as including one or more of the following within 30-days of surgery:

1) purulent drainage from the superficial or deep (fascia or muscle) incision, but not within the organ/ space component of the surgical site OR 2) at least two of: pain or tenderness; localised swelling; redness; heat; fever; AND the incision is opened deliberately to manage infection, spontaneously dehisces or the clinician diagnoses a SSI (negative culture swab excludes this criterion) OR 3) there is an abscess within the wound (clinically or radiologically detected).

Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention
Wound dehiscence
Time Frame: Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention
All layers of the wound open post-operatively
Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention
Need for re-intervention
Time Frame: Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention
Need for a second unplanned intervention within 30-days of the primary intervention.
Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention
Condition specific complications
Time Frame: Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention

OA: pneumonia, mediastinitis, pneumothorax, chylothorax, haemothorax, anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, recurrent TOF, other.

CDH: air leak, chylothorax, recurrence, adhesional obstruction.

IA: anastomotic leak/ stenosis, short-gut, missed additional atresia, adhesive bowel obstruction.

Gastroschisis: ischaemic bowel, abdominal compartment syndrome, necrotising enterocolitis.

Exomphalos: ruptured sac.

ARM: electrolyte disturbance, high stoma output (over 20mls/kg/day), stoma prolapse/ retraction/ herniation, peri-stoma skin breakdown (or perianal if primary reconstruction was undertaken without a covering stoma), anal stenosis.

Hirschsprung's disease: enterocolitis, electrolyte disturbance, high stoma output (over 20mls/kg/day), stoma prolapse/ retraction/ herniation, peri-stoma skin breakdown (or perianal if primary pull-through was undertaken without covering stoma), anal stenosis, post-operative obstruction, anastomotic leak.

Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention
Condition specific outcome variables
Time Frame: Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention
Oesophageal atresia: time to first oral feed (in days) and time to full oral feeds (in days)
Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Maximum 30-days post-intervention or following presentation for those who do not receive an intervention
In days, including the first and last day. Time from admission to death in patients who do not survive.
Maximum 30-days post-intervention or following presentation for those who do not receive an intervention
30-day post primary intervention mortality
Time Frame: Death within 30-days of primary intervention or 30-days of presentation in those who do not receive an intervention
Death within 30-days of primary intervention or 30-days of presentation in those who do not receive an intervention
Ventilation requirement
Time Frame: Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention or admission for those not receiving an intervention
Need for any ventilation (excluding during anaesthetic for interventions) and duration of ventilation in days
Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention or admission for those not receiving an intervention
Time to first enteral feed
Time Frame: Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention or admission for those not receiving an intervention
In days, including the day of the primary intervention and the day when enteral feeds were started.
Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention or admission for those not receiving an intervention
Time to full enteral feeds
Time Frame: Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention or admission for those not receiving an intervention
In days, including the day of the primary intervention and the day when full enteral feeds were achieved.
Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention or admission for those not receiving an intervention
Parenteral nutrition requirement
Time Frame: Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention or admission for those not receiving an intervention
Need for any parenteral nutrition and total duration of parenteral nutrition in days for those who receive it.
Occurring within 30-days of primary intervention or admission for those not receiving an intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 30, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 9, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Following publication of the main study results, the full anonymised dataset will be shared with all collaborators and made publicly available. At no time during presentation or publication of the study will individual collaborators, institutions or countries be independently identifiable. For the main study publication, all data within low, middle and high-income countries will be pooled for analysis. Following publication of the main study, collaborators from within a country can undertake a sub-analysis of the data from their country, but only if all collaborators who have contributed data from that country agree. Individual country names will not be identifiable on the dataset made publicly available - each country will be represented by a random number. The publicly available anonymised data will be identifiable by continent allowing for continental sub-analyses to be undertaken.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Following publication of the main results.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Clinical Trials on Comparisons will be made between LMICs and HICs

Subscribe