- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03689023
Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Among People With Spinal Cord Injury
February 14, 2023 updated by: Nicolaj Jersild Holm, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Among People With Spinal Cord Injury: Physical Activity, Healthy Diet and Maintenance After Discharge.
This study is a controlled pragmatic implementation study in clinical practice, with a primary focus on cardiovascular risk reduction through adherence to behavioral interventions related to physical activity and healthy diet.The intervention is interdisciplinary, multimodal and patient activating and uses the existing setting and work flows at the clinic, ensuring that the patients receive education about cardiovascular risk factors, physical activity and healthy diet through a systematic approach including targeted patient education.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This clinical intervention study will investigate the effectiveness of a uniform and systematic institutional strategy incorporating targeted strategic patient education about cardiovascular risk factors, physical activity and a healthy diet lifestyle starting early in the primary rehabilitation process with 6 months of follow up compared to a historic control group.
Test - retest reliability of four different VO2 peak tests and a multi sensor accelerometer respectively will be assessed as well.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
97
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hornbæk, Denmark, 3100
- Clinic for Spinal Cord Injuries, Rigshopitalet
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All newly injured patients (within the last 12 months) with Spinal Cord Injury admitted at Clinic for Spinal Cord Injuries, Rigshospitalet.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Insufficient skills in Danish language
- Reduced mental function that prevents reading and answering the questionnaires
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: A controlled multimodal intervention
A uniform and systematic patient education about cardiovascular risk factors, physical activity and a healthy diet lifestyle starting early in the primary rehabilitation process with 6 months of follow up.
|
The intervention is interdisciplinary, multimodal and patient activating and uses the existing setting and work flows at the Clinic as well as new interventions, ensuring that the patients receive education about cardiovascular risk factors, physical activity and healthy diet through a systematic approach including targeted patient education
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
VO2peak
Time Frame: Assessing change from admission to discharge in average 4-6 months after admission and follow up 6 months after discharge
|
Measures peak oxygen consumption in ml/kg/min
|
Assessing change from admission to discharge in average 4-6 months after admission and follow up 6 months after discharge
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Body Mass Index
Time Frame: At admission
|
Defined as a person's weight in kilograms divided by the square of the person's height in metres (kg/m2
|
At admission
|
|
Body Mass Index
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
Defined as a person's weight in kilograms divided by the square of the person's height in metres (kg/m2
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
Body Mass Index
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
Defined as a person's weight in kilograms divided by the square of the person's height in metres (kg/m2
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
|
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury
Time Frame: At admission
|
The classification tool involves a sensory and motor examination to determine the neurological level of the injury and whether the injury is complete or incomplete.
It defines neurological level as the most caudal level at which sensory and motor function are intact.
The completeness of the injury is graded from A to E according to the American Spinal Injury Assosciation Impairment Scale (AIS).
Grade A indicates a worse score and E indicates a better score
|
At admission
|
|
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
The classification tool involves a sensory and motor examination to determine the neurological level of the injury and whether the injury is complete or incomplete.
It defines neurological level as the most caudal level at which sensory and motor function are intact.
The completeness of the injury is graded from A to E according to the American Spinal Injury Assosciation Impairment Scale (AIS).
Grade A indicates a worse score and E indicates a better score
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
The classification tool involves a sensory and motor examination to determine the neurological level of the injury and whether the injury is complete or incomplete.
It defines neurological level as the most caudal level at which sensory and motor function are intact.
The completeness of the injury is graded from A to E according to the American Spinal Injury Assosciation Impairment Scale (AIS).
Grade A indicates a worse score and E indicates a better score
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
|
Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire for people with Spinal Cord Injury
Time Frame: At admission
|
Questionnaire concerning the amount of leisure time physical activity the past 7 days.
The patient describes how many of the last 7 days and for how many minutes he/she has been physical active and also the intensity of the activity described as mild, moderate or vigorous.
Higher values related to days, minutes and intensity represent a better outcome and lower values represent a worse outcome.On the scale related to days, 0 is a minimum score and 7 is a maximum score.
|
At admission
|
|
Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire for people with Spinal Cord Injury
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
Questionnaire concerning the amount of leisure time physical activity the past 7 days.
The patient describes how many of the last 7 days and for how many minutes he/she has been physical active and also the intensity of the activity described as mild, moderate or vigorous.
Higher values related to days, minutes and intensity represent a better outcome and lower values represent a worse outcome.On the scale related to days, 0 is a minimum score and 7 is a maximum score.
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire for people with Spinal Cord Injury
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
Questionnaire concerning the amount of leisure time physical activity the past 7 days.
The patient describes how many of the last 7 days and for how many minutes he/she has been physical active and also the intensity of the activity described as mild, moderate or vigorous.
Higher values related to days, minutes and intensity represent a better outcome and lower values represent a worse outcome.On the scale related to days, 0 is a minimum score and 7 is a maximum score.
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
|
The Exercise Self Efficacy Scale for people with Spinal Cord Injury
Time Frame: At admission
|
A questionnaire with a 4-point rating scale describing how confident persons with spinal cord injury are with regard to carrying out regular physical activities and exercise.
The questionnaire consists of 10 items with corresponding response options on a 4-point Likert scale (1-not at all true, 4-always true) with 1 indicating a worse score and 4 indicating a better score.
The total score is derived by summing the scores for the individual items with a possible score range from 10 to 40.
|
At admission
|
|
The Exercise Self Efficacy Scale for people with Spinal Cord Injury
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
A questionnaire with a 4-point rating scale describing how confident persons with spinal cord injury are with regard to carrying out regular physical activities and exercise.
The questionnaire consists of 10 items with corresponding response options on a 4-point Likert scale (1-not at all true, 4-always true) with 1 indicating a worse score and 4 indicating a better score.
The total score is derived by summing the scores for the individual items with a possible score range from 10 to 40.
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
The Exercise Self Efficacy Scale for people with Spinal Cord Injury
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
A questionnaire with a 4-point rating scale describing how confident persons with spinal cord injury are with regard to carrying out regular physical activities and exercise.
The questionnaire consists of 10 items with corresponding response options on a 4-point Likert scale (1-not at all true, 4-always true) with 1 indicating a worse score and 4 indicating a better score.
The total score is derived by summing the scores for the individual items with a possible score range from 10 to 40.
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
|
Dual energy x-ray absorbtiometry (Dexa)
Time Frame: At admission
|
Assessment of lean body mass percentage
|
At admission
|
|
Dual energy x-ray absorbtiometry (Dexa)
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
Assessment of lean body mass percentage
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
|
Blood pressure
Time Frame: At admission
|
Assessment of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in mm/ Hg
|
At admission
|
|
Blood pressure
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
Assessment of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in mm/ Hg
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
Blood pressure
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
Assessment of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in mm/ Hg
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
|
The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
The SDM-Q-9 is a questionnaire describing the process of Shared Decision Making between health care professionals and the patient from the patient's perspective and consists of nine statements, which can be rated on a six-point scale from ''completely disagree'' (0) being the worse score to ''completely agree'' (5) being the better score.
Summing up all items leads to a raw total score between 0 and 45.
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
Triglycerides
Time Frame: At admission
|
Assessment of plasma triglycerides in mmol/l
|
At admission
|
|
Triglycerides
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
Assessment of plasma triglycerides in mmol/l
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
Triglycerides
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
Assessment of plasma triglycerides in mmol/l
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
|
Cholesterol
Time Frame: At admission
|
Assessment of cholesterol in mmol/l
|
At admission
|
|
Cholesterol
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
Assessment of cholesterol in mmol/l
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
Cholesterol
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
Assessment of cholesterol in mmol/l
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
|
HemoglobinA1c
Time Frame: At admission
|
A marker for carbohydrate metabolism measured in mmol/mol
|
At admission
|
|
HemoglobinA1c
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
A marker for carbohydrate metabolism measured in mmol/mol
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
HemoglobinA1c
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
A marker for carbohydrate metabolism measured in mmol/mol
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
|
C - reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame: At admission
|
A clinical biomarker that signposts non-specific inflammation measured in Mg/L
|
At admission
|
|
C - reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
A clinical biomarker that signposts non-specific inflammation measured in Mg/L
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
C - reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
A clinical biomarker that signposts non-specific inflammation measured in Mg/L
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure III
Time Frame: At admission
|
The SCIM is composed of 19 items that assess 3 domains.1
Self-care (6 items, scores range from 0-20). 2 Respiration and sphincter management (4 items, scores range from 0-40). 3 Mobility (9 items, scores range from 0-40).
The total SCIM scores range from 0 to 100.
|
At admission
|
|
Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure III
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
The SCIM is composed of 19 items that assess 3 domains.1
Self-care (6 items, scores range from 0-20). 2 Respiration and sphincter management (4 items, scores range from 0-40). 3 Mobility (9 items, scores range from 0-40).
The total SCIM scores range from 0 to 100.
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure III
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
The SCIM is composed of 19 items that assess 3 domains.1
Self-care (6 items, scores range from 0-20). 2 Respiration and sphincter management (4 items, scores range from 0-40). 3 Mobility (9 items, scores range from 0-40).
The total SCIM scores range from 0 to 100.
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire- 2
Time Frame: At admission
|
The PHQ-2, comprising the first 2 items of the PHQ-9, inquires about the degree to which an individual has experienced depressed mood and anhedonia over the past two weeks Score range is from from 0- 3, with 0 indicating a better score.
Total score ranges from 0 (minimum score to 6 (maximum score), with 0 indicating a better score and with a cut-off score of 3 as the cut point for screening purposes.
|
At admission
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire- 2
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
The PHQ-2, comprising the first 2 items of the PHQ-9, inquires about the degree to which an individual has experienced depressed mood and anhedonia over the past two weeks Score range is from from 0- 3, with 0 indicating a better score.
Total score ranges from 0 (minimum score to 6 (maximum score), with 0 indicating a better score and with a cut-off score of 3 as the cut point for screening purposes.
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire- 2
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
The PHQ-2, comprising the first 2 items of the PHQ-9, inquires about the degree to which an individual has experienced depressed mood and anhedonia over the past two weeks Score range is from from 0- 3, with 0 indicating a better score.
Total score ranges from 0 (minimum score to 6 (maximum score), with 0 indicating a better score and with a cut-off score of 3 as the cut point for screening purposes.
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
|
The International SCI Quality of Life Basic Data Set
Time Frame: At admission
|
Consists of three questions scored on a scale of 0-10 regarding general quality of life, physical health and satisfaction with psychological Health.
0 indicates a worse score and 10 indicates a better score.
|
At admission
|
|
The International SCI Quality of Life Basic Data Set
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
Consists of three questions scored on a scale of 0-10 regarding general quality of life, physical health and satisfaction with psychological Health.
0 indicates a worse score and 10 indicates a better score.
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
The International SCI Quality of Life Basic Data Set
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
Consists of three questions scored on a scale of 0-10 regarding general quality of life, physical health and satisfaction with psychological Health.
0 indicates a worse score and 10 indicates a better score.
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
|
Objective physical activity (accelerometry)
Time Frame: At admission
|
Is measured with a multisensor device (Actiheart®) measuring physical activity energy expenditure in kcal/min.
|
At admission
|
|
Objective physical activity (accelerometry)
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
Is measured with a multisensor device (Actiheart®) measuring physical activity energy expenditure in kcal/min..
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
Objective physical activity (accelerometry)
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
Is measured with a multisensor device (Actiheart®) measuring physical activity energy expenditure in kcal/min..
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
|
The Nordic monitoring of diet, physical activity and overweight (NORMON)
Time Frame: At admission
|
The questionnaire Is used to measure the course in dietary habits and explores how often 16 food indicators are consumed.
The food indicators are chosen in a way that reflects the diets nutritional quality.
An association between the frequency of food indicator intake and the overall nutritional value of the diet is present.
Several of the chosen food indicators are recommended in the national nutritional recommendations.
|
At admission
|
|
The Nordic monitoring of diet, physical activity and overweight (NORMON)
Time Frame: At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
The questionnaire Is used to measure the course in dietary habits and explores how often 16 food indicators are consumed.
The food indicators are chosen in a way that reflects the diets nutritional quality.
An association between the frequency of food indicator intake and the overall nutritional value of the diet is present.
Several of the chosen food indicators are recommended in the national nutritional recommendations.
|
At discharge in average 4-6 months after admission
|
|
The Nordic monitoring of diet, physical activity and overweight (NORMON)
Time Frame: At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
The questionnaire Is used to measure the course in dietary habits and explores how often 16 food indicators are consumed.
The food indicators are chosen in a way that reflects the diets nutritional quality.
An association between the frequency of food indicator intake and the overall nutritional value of the diet is present.
Several of the chosen food indicators are recommended in the national nutritional recommendations.
|
At follow up 6 months after discharge
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 26, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
September 28, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 17, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 14, 2023
Last Verified
February 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Primary study
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Not yet recruitingInjury, Spinal Cord
-
Khon Kaen UniversityUnknownInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
Institut GuttmannNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Disease | Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) | Traumatic Spinal Cord InjuriesSpain
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCompletedInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
InVivo TherapeuticsTerminated
-
Ekso BionicsBurke Medical Research InstituteCompletedInjuries, Spinal CordUnited States
-
ReWalk Robotics, Inc.Unknown
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNot yet recruitingSpine Injury | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury | Cord Injury, Spinal | Cord Infarction Spinal
-
Kessler FoundationNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Disease | Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)United States
Clinical Trials on A controlled multimodal intervention
-
yueh chu wuRecruitingType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)Taiwan
-
Karlstad UniversityRegion Jönköping County; Region Stockholm; Region Örebro County; Region VärmlandRecruitingVulvodynia (Chronic Vulvar Pain)Sweden
-
University of CalgaryUniversity of British Columbia; Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Alberta Health servicesActive, not recruitingUtilization, Health CareCanada
-
Medical University of ViennaMedical University of Graz; Medical University Innsbruck; FH Joanneum Gesellschaft... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) | Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)Austria
-
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityCompletedFalls (Accidents) in Old Age | Malnutrition Elderly | Depression in Adults | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Old Age | Frailty at Older AdultsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of MalagaAndaluz Health ServiceCompletedPhysical Activity | Dietary Modification | Patient Fall | Fragility | Multimodal Intervention | Other Metabolic DiseasesSpain
-
Finnish Institute for Health and WelfareKarolinska Institutet; Medical University of Vienna; University Of Perugia; Maastricht... and other collaboratorsCompletedCognitive Impairment | Dementia | Cognitive DeclineSweden, Austria, Finland, Italy
-
University Hospital, BordeauxCompletedMultiple System AtrophyFrance
-
University of MalagaCompleted