Influence of Cognitive Function Software Therapy on the Improvement of Manual Skills in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

October 1, 2018 updated by: Pawlukowska Wioletta, Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system leading to the impairment of motor, visual and cognitive functions. A standardized rehabilitation of cognitive functions can be provided by a systematized treatment program devised to improve neurological patients' quality of life. The degree of difficulty of the computerized tasks was adapted to a patient's predispositions and modified once a desirable improvement in the practiced skill has reached.

The aim of the study was to assess the influence of cognitive therapy by means of the cognitive software on manual dexterity in patients with multiple sclerosis. We also attempted to establish whether factors like age, sex and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores contribute to the outcomes of that therapy. All patients enrolled will have a documented history of MS disease prior to study enrollment. The EDSS scores varied between 1.5-4 (mean score 2.1). The Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), administered to all of the patients, was used to evaluate the subjects' manual dexterity. Having been administered the NHPT test the initial 86-patient group was reduced to a cohort of 40 subjects qualified for the study, who were subsequently randomly divided into two groups - the study and the control - each consisting of 20 subjects. Three times a week the study group received the upper limb treatment by means of the cognitive function platform. They were expected to achieve 96 levels of visuo-motor coordination in 3 months or the treatment was to be terminated. After completing each task the patient would move on to a higher level of difficulty. Failure meant having to redo that particular task. One training session lasted 20 min., after which the patient could take a break.

Having completed the training each patient was administered the NHPT test again in view of assessing the efficiency of their upper limb. Due to progressive deterioration of health and other factors only 10 patients managed to complete the training.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Unii Lubelskiej
      • Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej, Poland, 71-228
        • Departmen of Neurology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

MS clinically diagnosed based on McDonald's criteria of 2011 The EDSS between 1.5-4; relapsing-remitting form MS;

exclusio criteria Mental disorders, alcoholism, severe vision disorders including diplopia coinciding upper limb therapy

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Grup1, Grup2
The initial group comprised 86 subjects including. The Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), administered to all of the patients, was used to evaluate the subjects' manual dexterity. The standardized scale enabled obtaining scores of high validity (right: r= 0.984, left: r = 0.993). Having been administered the NHPT test the initial 86-patient group was reduced to a cohort of 40 subjects qualified for the study, who were subsequently randomly divided into two groups - the study and the control - each consisting of 20 subjects. Three times a week the study group received the upper limb treatment by means of the cognitive function platform. They were expected to achieve 96 levels of visuo-motor coordination in 3 months or the treatment was to be terminated. Prior to the first session of the treatment the patients were provided with all relevant instructions and information about the test displayed on the monitor. They could also choose which hand they would start with.
Experimental: Grup1,Grup2
The initial group comprised 86 subjects including. The Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), administered to all of the patients, was used to evaluate the subjects' manual dexterity. The standardized scale enabled obtaining scores of high validity (right: r= 0.984, left: r = 0.993). Having been administered the NHPT test the initial 86-patient group was reduced to a cohort of 40 subjects qualified for the study, who were subsequently randomly divided into two groups - the study and the control - each consisting of 20 subjects. Three times a week the study group received the upper limb treatment by means of the cognitive function platform. They were expected to achieve 96 levels of visuo-motor coordination in 3 months or the treatment was to be terminated. Prior to the first session of the treatment the patients were provided with all relevant instructions and information about the test displayed on the monitor. They could also choose which hand they would start with.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hand therapy using cognitive functions in patients with MS
Time Frame: 3 months
Three times a week the study group received the upper limb treatment by means of the cognitive function platform. They were expected to achieve 96 levels of visuo-motor coordination in 3 months or the treatment was to be terminated. After completing each task the patient would move on to a higher level of difficulty. Failure meant having to redo that particular task. One training session lasted 20 min., after which the patient could take a break.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 13, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

3
Subscribe