Comparative Evaluation of the Regenerative Capacity of Two Platelet Concentrates

October 24, 2018 updated by: Maha Mohamed Abou-Heikal, Cairo University

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Regeneration of Necrotic Immature Maxillary Anterior Teeth. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF) is a flowable blood concentrate that is entirely natural and allows ease of access and flow within the root canal. It was first developed in 2014 by modifying the centrifugation parameters. I-PRF has great potential in the field of endodontics. At present, it is still in its infancy and needs to be explored with regard to its regenerative efficacy.

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to clinically and comparatively investigate Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and I-PRF.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

An ideal treatment option for an immature necrotic tooth is the regeneration of pulp-like tissue that is capable of boosting the continuation of normal root development. The use of platelet concentrates for that purpose is a clinically relevant, minimally invasive approach which has a promising potential of reducing the healing period. Among which, the most commonly employed is the Platelet-Rich Plasma that is not entirely natural. It involves the use of non-autologous anticoagulants such as bovine thrombin to maintain the fluid consistency which prevents clot formation and thus impairs wound healing, affects the coagulation process and can also trigger an immune reaction, thereby, suppressing regeneration.

PRP offers a short-term release of most of the growth factors unlike the Platelet-Rich Fibrin which allows for a more sustained release. PRF does not require any biochemical handling of blood and is easy to procure but due to the gel-like consistency, its adaptability within the root canal requires excessive removal of root dentin.

In addition, the application of recombinant growth factors within the root canal is associated with high cost which hinders its applicability in the common clinical practice.

Therefore, a new regenerative technique is required that combines the advantages of both PRP and PRF while overcoming their drawbacks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 23 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having necrotic maxillary anterior tooth/teeth due to caries or trauma
  • Radiographic criteria: preoperative radiograph showing incomplete root formation with a wide apical foramen.
  • Positive patient/guardian compliance for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncooperative patient
  • Lack of patient commitment to the treatment plan and the follow-up period
  • Mature necrotic anterior teeth due to caries or trauma
  • Vital maxillary anterior teeth with open apices
  • Non-restorable teeth
  • Grossly decayed or fractured teeth that require post and core as final restorations
  • Presence of periodontal pockets
  • Radiographically: presence of external or internal root resorption, fracture lines or cracks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Injectable platelet-rich fibrin
A platelet concentrate will be prepared from the patient's own blood in plain plastic tubes, without the use of anticoagulants, and applied immediately within the root canal before coagulation.
A blood sample will be drawn from the patient, centrifuged at 700 rpm for 3 minutes and the upper yellow fluid will be collected by a plastic syringe, avoiding the inclusion of the red blood cells underneath, and will be introduced within the root canal.
Active Comparator: Platelet-rich plasma
A platelet concentrate will be prepared from the patient's own blood in tubes containing anticoagulants to maintain the fluid consistency and applied within the root canal.
A blood sample will be drawn from the patient, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes and the upper yellow fluid will be collected by a plastic syringe, avoiding the inclusion of the red blood cells underneath, and will be introduced within the root canal.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Increase in root length
Time Frame: one year follow-up
root length will be measured on the preoperative and postoperative radiographs and the percentage increase in length will be calculated
one year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Restoration of tooth sensitivity
Time Frame: one year
sensitivity will be measured by an electric pulp tester
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jealane El-Shafei, PhD, Professor Doctor of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.
  • Study Director: Samia Shouman, PhD, Professor Doctor of Medical Biochemistry, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University
  • Study Director: Nehal Nabil, PhD, Lecturer of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Necrotic Pulp

Clinical Trials on Injectable platelet-rich fibrin

3
Subscribe