Evaluation Of Efficacy Of Liquid Platelet Rich Fibrin In Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

March 19, 2020 updated by: Burcu Gürsoytrak, Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Evaluation Of The Clinical Efficacy Of Liquid Platelet Rich Fibrin Application In Painful Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of liquid platelet-rich fibrin administration at different Wilkes stages.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Thirty six patients with unilateral painful internal derangement (ID) (Wilkes' 3-4-5) were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups. In group 1 were treated with only artrosythesis. In group 2 were treated with artrosythesis and liquid platelet rich fibrin. In group 2, patients were injected with 1.5-2cc of liquid platelet-rich fibrin within the superior joint space at operation day. Pain and subjective dysfunction were recorded using a visual analog scale and Helkimo index at operation day and tenth day, one month later and 3 months later.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Aydın, Turkey
        • Recruiting
        • Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 62 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral internal temporomandibular disorder
  • localized temporomandibular joint pain
  • Scoring 3 and above in Wilke's classification.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Autoimmune diseases
  • Significant mechanical obstruction that prevents mouth opening
  • Acute capsulitis,
  • Benign or malignant temporomandibular joint lesions
  • Neurological disorders,
  • Blood diseases and coagulation disorders
  • Patients with a history of allergies or anaphylactic shock.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arthrocentesis
2 guiding points have been created on the skin. The first one is 10 mm in front of the tragus and 2 mm below the tragus line. The second guide point is on the same line, 20 mm in front of the tragus and 6 mm below. After the auriculotemporal nerve block was made, the first 20 gauge needle was inserted from the first point. 2mL Ringer's Lactate solution is injected into the temporomandibular joint area, and then a second 20 gauge needle is entered from the second guide point determined before and pressurized washing is performed with 100 mL of 5% lactate solution to enter the first needle and exit from the second needle.
2 guiding points have been created on the skin. The first one is 10 mm in front of the tragus and 2 mm below the tragus line. The second guide point is on the same line, 20 mm in front of the tragus and 6 mm below. After the auriculotemporal nerve block was made, the first 20 gauge needle was inserted from the first point. 2mL Ringer's Lactate solution is injected into the temporomandibular joint area, and then a second 20 gauge needle is entered from the second guide point determined before and pressurized washing is performed with 100 mL of 5% lactate solution to enter the first needle and exit from the second needle.
Experimental: Arthrocentesis plus i-PRF injection
2 tubes of blood were collected from the patients with the help of vacuumed 10 mL special liquid PRF tubes (Choukroun I-PRF Collection Tubes, Dr. Choukroun) after arthrocentesis. Blood tubes were centrifuged at 700rpm for 3 minutes. 3 mL of liquid PRF was obtained at the top of each tube. Only the second needle was removed without removing the first needle inserted. I-PRF was injected into the joint areas of all patients in the experimental group, with a maximum dose of 2 mL per joint.
2 guiding points have been created on the skin. The first one is 10 mm in front of the tragus and 2 mm below the tragus line. The second guide point is on the same line, 20 mm in front of the tragus and 6 mm below. After the auriculotemporal nerve block was made, the first 20 gauge needle was inserted from the first point. 2mL Ringer's Lactate solution is injected into the temporomandibular joint area, and then a second 20 gauge needle is entered from the second guide point determined before and pressurized washing is performed with 100 mL of 5% lactate solution to enter the first needle and exit from the second needle.
2 tubes of blood were collected from the patients with the help of vacuumed 10 mL special liquid PRF tubes (Choukroun I-PRF Collection Tubes, Dr. Choukroun) after arthrocentesis. Blood tubes were centrifuged at 700rpm for 3 minutes. 3 mL of liquid PRF was obtained at the top of each tube. I-PRF was injected into the joint areas of all patients in the experimental group, with a maximum dose of 2 mL per joint.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Score improvement over time
Time Frame: operation time, tenth day, end of first month, end of third month

In the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index, the maximum mandibular movement limits are measured vertically and laterally. In addition, TMJ function, muscle pain, TMJ region pain and mandibular motion pain are evaluated separately. After all these evaluations, all the scores given are summed up and a total dysfunction score is obtained. If this total score is 0, the dysfunction is completely healed. If the total score is between 1 and 4, mild dysfunction, between 5 and 9, moderate dysfunction, and between 10 and 25 severe dysfunction.

Since lower scores represent better health, the amount of improvement between sessionsis calculated by subtracting the next score from the previous score.

operation time, tenth day, end of first month, end of third month
Visual Analog Scale improvement over time
Time Frame: operation time, tenth day, end of first month, end of third month

The patient gives his pain a value between 0-10. The patients' pain scores were recorded by using a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0, which represents no pain, to 10, which represents the worst possible pain.

Since lower scores represent better health, the amount of improvement between sessionsis calculated by subtracting the next score from the previous score.

operation time, tenth day, end of first month, end of third month
Maximum incisal opening improvement over time
Time Frame: operation time, tenth day, end of first month, end of third month

It is the vertical distance between the incisal teeth when the patient opens his mouth to the maximum. It is measured with the help of a caliper.

Since higher scores represent better health, the amount of improvement between sessionsis calculated by subtracting the previous score from the next score.

operation time, tenth day, end of first month, end of third month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Burcu GURSOYTRAK, Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

Clinical Trials on Arthrocentesis

3
Subscribe