Ultrasound Guided TAP Block Versus Caudal Block in Pediatrics

October 6, 2018 updated by: Mohammed Abdullah Seliem Mekawy, Zagazig University

Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Caudal Block in Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgery in Pediatrics

The use of pediatric regional anesthesia has increased because of its effective pain control, improved safety profile of local anesthetic agents, in addition to the introduction of ultra-sound. At present, caudal block is one of the most common regional anesthetic techniques employed in pediatric surgery. In addition to providing postoperative analgesia, caudal block significantly reduces intraoperative analgesic requirements and upper airway complications. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block involves infiltration of local anesthetics to the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. Indeed, TAP block offers a hemodynamic stability, appropriate intra-operative analgesia and post surgical analgesia of the abdominal wall.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The use of pediatric regional anesthesia has increased because of its effective pain control, improved safety profile of local anesthetic agents, in addition to the introduction of ultra-sound.

At present, caudal block is one of the most common regional anesthetic techniques employed in pediatric surgery. In addition to providing postoperative analgesia, caudal block significantly reduces intraoperative analgesic requirements and upper airway complications.

However, in recent days there is a trend toward the use of peripheral nerve blockade wherever applicable, given the lower incidences of adverse effects when compared with neuron-axial techniques. Furthermore, there may be specific anatomic variations or abnormalities which preclude the use of caudal block.

The abdominal wall consists of three muscular layers, the external oblique abdominis muscle (EOAM), the internal oblique abdominis muscle (IOAM), and the tranversus abdominis muscle (TAM), and their associated fascial sheaths. The central abdominal wall also includes the rectus abdominis muscles and its associated fascial sheath. This muscular wall is innervated by nerve afferents that course through the transversus abdominis neuron-fascial plane.

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block involves infiltration of local anesthetics to the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. Indeed, TAP block offers a hemodynamic stability, appropriate intra-operative analgesia and post surgical analgesia of the abdominal wall.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alsharkia
      • Zagazig, Alsharkia, Egypt, 44519
        • Faculty of medicine, Zagazig University.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA (American society of anesthiologists) physical status grade I-II.
  • Operations not extending more than two hours.
  • Unilateral surgeries.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of parents.
  • Urgent cases.
  • Bilateral or Complicated hernias (i.e., obstructed, strangulated, irreducible …).
  • Other contraindication of regional anesthesia e.g. septic focus at site of injection, patients on anticoagulant therapy or suffering from coagulopathy, allergy to local anesthetic drug.
  • Prolonged operations more than two hours.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: group A
Transversus Abdominis Plane block using 1ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% under ultrasound guidance
ultrasound (US) guided TAP block will be done to the patients using 0.25% bupivacaine, in a dose of (1 ml / kg).
Dose 1ml /kg of patient body weight
using superficial high frequency probe to guide regional anesthesia
Active Comparator: group B
Caudal block using 1ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% under ultrasound guidance
Dose 1ml /kg of patient body weight
using superficial high frequency probe to guide regional anesthesia
ultrasound (US) guided caudal block will be done to the patients using 0.25% bupivacaine, in a dose of (1 ml / kg).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time for first analgesic request
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
by investigator till hospital discharge, then through telephone with parents after discharge
24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Opioid consumpsion
Time Frame: During operation
Total amount of intra-operative fentanyl consumption.
During operation
Total Ibuprofen consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Total amount of oral ibuprofen consumption postoperative.
24 hours after surgery
post operative pain score.
Time Frame: 2 , 4 , 8 , 12 & 24 hours after surgery.
Pain assessment by Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) by investigator till hospital discharge, then through telephone with parents after discharge
2 , 4 , 8 , 12 & 24 hours after surgery.
parents satisfaction score.
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
satisfaction were measured on a 5 point scale of "extremely dissatisfied" to "extremely satisfied" as follows: 1- Completely dissatisfied (worst), 2- Dissatisfied 3- Not satisfied, nor dissatisfied, 4- Satisfied, 5- Completely satisfied (best).
24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mohammed A Refky, MD, Faculty of medicine, zagazig university, Egypt
  • Study Chair: Doaa M Farid, MD, Faculty of medicine, zagazig university, Egypt
  • Study Director: Ayat A Amer, MD, Faculty of medicine, zagazig university, Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Transversus Abdominis Plane Block

Subscribe