Comparison Between Erector Spinae Plane Block and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

September 7, 2022 updated by: Israa Ihab Abdel Aziz, Ain Shams University

Comparative Study Between Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

This study aims to compare the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae block versus the ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I and II.
  2. Female sex.
  3. Age between 40 to 60 years old.
  4. Scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy surgeries.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient's refusal.
  2. Patients who received long-acting opioids preoperatively.
  3. Patients with bleeding disorders and coagulopathy.
  4. Infection at the injection site.
  5. Allergy to local anesthetics.
  6. Patients with significant cognitive dysfunction.
  7. Patients with diabetic neuropathy.
  8. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes.
  9. Patients with advanced cardiac, respiratory, hepatic or renal disease.
  10. Patients with viral hepatitis or HIV.
  11. Surgeries which have been complicated or prolonged (more than 150 mins).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A : erector spinae block.
patients will receive bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae block.
Patients will receive ESB. In the lateral decubitus, after skin sterilization, ESP block will be performed at the level of T9
Experimental: Group B : transversus abdominis plane block.
patients will receive bilateral ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block.
patients will receive TAP block in supine position after skin sterilization, TAP block will be performed between internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total morphine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
Compare postoperative pain intensity using the total amount of morphine consumption in the first 24 hours after the operation, and the time for first call rescue analgesia
24 hours postoperative
Visual Analog Scale Score
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
Compare postoperative pain intensity using VAS score in the first 24 hours after the operation.The VAS score is a 10-cm line labeled with "worst pain imaginable" on the right border, and "no pain" on the left border (ranging from 0 by indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain).
24 hours postoperative
The time for first call rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
the time for first call rescue analgesia
24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
Measure patient satisfaction by asking the patient if he is satisfied or not "yes or no"
24 hours postoperative
Recognize the adverse effects
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
Recognize the adverse effects
24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: ossama mansour, professor, Ain shams university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 28, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ainshamsU FAMSU

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uterine Diseases

Clinical Trials on erector spinae plane block

Subscribe