Long-term Surgical Outcomes of Scaphoid Proximal Pole Fracture Nonunion

October 7, 2018 updated by: Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Long-term Radiographic and Clinic Surgical Outcomes of Scaphoid Proximal Pole Fracture Nonunion

The treatment for scaphoid proximal pole nonunion remains challenging due to the poor vascularity in the proximal pole fragment, associated SL injury and the technique of fixation. Vascularized bone grafts and non-vascularized iliac bone graft have been used in patients with scaphoid proximal pole nonunion, but the indication has not been well clarified. Alternatively, we have been treating such patients with vascularized bone graft , or non-vascularized bone graft with screw or k-wire fixation with considerable success. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and analyze retrospectively the surgical efficacy of our procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Scaphoid nonunion are common and operative treatment with bone graft was reported to have good result. However, the treatment for proximal pole nonunion remains controversial. There are some patterns of pathoanatomy combined with scaphoid fracture, like SL ligament tears, which could not be easily identified or treated initially. The proximal pole nonunion was near SL joint. Therefore, proximal pole nonunion may result in DISI instability. Furthermore, proximal pole nonunion was identified as a poor prognostic factor in scaphoid nonunion.

In the past 10 years, we have some different technique, like VBG, arthroscopic bone graft to achieve good results. Some studies revealed that significantly better SL stability was achieved with ARASL. We also used ARASL with BG to improve proximal pole union. However, it is not clear which method would be appropriate for proximal pole nonunion. We retrospectively investigated the functional outcome and radiological results after at least 2-year follow-up to clarify the surgical efficacy of these procedures.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 112
        • Recruiting
        • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Using arthroscopic or open fixation combined with bone graft surgery for proximal pole scaphoid nonunion

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1) chronic nonunion (wrist pain for more than 3 months after injury) as defined by preoperative radiographs; and (2) combined positive SL instability measured by intraoperative arthroscopy exam test; (3) Grade I SNAC.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) skeletally immature patients; (2) previous wrist trauma or surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score
Time Frame: averaged 2 years
30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100
averaged 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic examination
Time Frame: averaged 2 years
The union was defined as trabecular bridging across the fracture site
averaged 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jung-Pan Wang, M.D.,ph.D, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 14, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 13, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 13, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-08-010AC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthopedic

3
Subscribe