FlexNav EU CE Mark Study

October 28, 2021 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices

Assessment of the Abbott FlexNav™ Delivery System for Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in High and Extreme Risk Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to characterize the safety of the next-generation FlexNav™ Delivery System for transfemoral implantation of the Portico™ Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valve in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis patients who are considered of high or extreme risk for surgical aortic valve replacement. Data from the study will be used to support CE Mark of the FlexNav™ Delivery System and Loading System in Europe.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The FlexNav European Union (EU) study will be conducted as a prospective, multi-center, single-arm investigational study.

High or extreme risk patients with symptomatic, severe native aortic stenosis who are determined by an independent subject selection committee to meet eligibility criteria for Portico™ Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valve implantation via a transfemoral access approach will undergo a Portico valve implant using the next-generation FlexNav Delivery System.

Subject data will be collected at screening, baseline, pre-procedure, peri-procedure, post-procedure, discharge, 30 days, 6 months and 1-year from the index procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Rigshospitalet
    • Lombard
      • San Donato Milanese, Lombard, Italy, 20097
        • Policlinico San Donato
      • St. Gallen, Switzerland, 9007
        • Kantonsspital St. Gallen
      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8091
        • Universitaets Spital Zuerich
      • Belfast, United Kingdom, BT12 6BA
        • Royal Victoria Hospital
    • Swansea
      • Morriston, Swansea, United Kingdom, SA6 6NL
        • Morriston Hospital - ABM University Health Board

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 96 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Candidates for High Risk classification must meet all the following inclusion criteria:

  1. Subjects must have co-morbidities such that the local heart team concur the predicted risk of operative mortality is ≥15% or a minimum Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score of 8%.

    a) A candidate who does not meet the STS score criteria of ≥ 8% may be included in the study if at least one surgeon in the local heart team concludes and documents the patient's predicted risk of operative mortality is ≥15%. The surgeon's assessment of operative comorbidities (including frailty indices) not captured by the STS score must be documented in the study case report form as well as in the patient medical record.

  2. Subject is of legal age or older for consent in the host country.
  3. Subject has senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with echo-derived criteria: mean gradient >40 mmHg or jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/s or doppler velocity index (DVI) <0.25 and an initial aortic valve area (AVA) of ≤1.0 cm2 (indexed Effective Orifice Area (EOA) ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2). (Qualifying AVA baseline measurement must be within 60 days prior to informed consent).
  4. Subject has symptomatic aortic stenosis as demonstrated by NYHA Functional Classification of II, III, or IV.
  5. The subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site.
  6. The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.
  7. Subject's aortic annulus is 19-27mm diameter as measured by computed tomography (CT) conducted within 12 months prior to informed consent. If a CT i contraindicated and/or not possible to be obtained for certain subjects, a 3D echo and non-contrast CT of chest and abdomen/pelvis may be accepted.

    All candidates for Extreme Risk classification must meet # 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 of the above criteria, and

  8. After formal consultation with the local heart team (including at least one surgeon) it is agreed that medical factors preclude the subject from undergoing operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement. Specifically, the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity should exceed 50%. The local heart teams' consult notes shall specify the medical or anatomic factors leading to that conclusion and include a printout of the calculation of the STS score to additionally identify the risks in these patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

Candidates will be excluded if any of the following conditions are present:

  1. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction (defined as: ST Segment Elevation as evidenced on 12 Lead ECG) within 30 days prior to index procedure.
  2. Aortic valve is a congenital unicuspid or congenital bicuspid valve, or is noncalcified as verified by echocardiography.
  3. Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation 3-4+).
  4. Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days prior to index procedure.
  5. Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve or other implant in any valve position, prosthetic ring, severe circumferential mitral annular calcification (MAC) which is continuous with calcium in the LVOT, severe (greater than 3+) mitral insufficiency, or severe mitral stenosis with pulmonary compromise.
  6. Blood dyscrasias as defined: leukopenia (WBC<3000 mm3), acute anemia (Hb < 9 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000 cells/mm³).
  7. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
  8. Cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, or mechanical hemodynamic support.
  9. Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization.
  10. Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance.
  11. Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  12. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with or without obstruction (HOCM).
  13. Severe ventricular dysfunction with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <20% as measured by resting echocardiogram.
  14. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  15. Active peptic ulcer or upper GI bleeding within 3 months prior to index procedure.
  16. A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine (Ticlid), or clopidogrel (Plavix), or sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately premedicated.
  17. Recent (within 6 months prior to index procedure date) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or a transient ischemic attack (TIA).
  18. Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL) and/or end stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis.
  19. Life expectancy < 12 months from the time of informed consent due to noncardiac co-morbid conditions.
  20. Significant aortic disease, including abdominal aortic or thoracic aneurysm defined as maximal luminal diameter 5cm or greater; marked tortuosity (hyperacute bend), aortic arch atheroma (especially if thick [> 5 mm], protruding or ulcerated) or narrowing (especially with calcification and surface irregularities) of the abdominal or thoracic aorta, severe "unfolding" and tortuosity of the thoracic aorta.
  21. Native aortic annulus size < 19 mm or > 27 mm per the baseline diagnostic imaging.
  22. Aortic root angulation > 70°.
  23. Currently participating in an investigational drug or device study.
  24. Active bacterial endocarditis within 6 months prior to the index procedure.
  25. Bulky calcified aortic valve leaflets in close proximity to coronary ostia.
  26. Non-calcified aortic annulus.
  27. Iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe insertion of the FlexNav™ delivery system with or without an arterial introducer sheath such as severe obstructive calcification, or severe tortuosity.
  28. In the judgment of the investigator, a condition that could limit a patient's ability or willingness to participate in the study, comply with study required testing and/or follow- up visits or that could impact scientific integrity of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Portico valve and FlexNav™ Delivery System
Portico valve implantation with the second-generation FlexNav Delivery system
Subjects will undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the Portico valve and second-generation FlexNav Delivery system via a transfemoral access approach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major Vascular Complications
Time Frame: At 30 days post index procedure
Percentage of patients with a VARC-2 defined major vascular complication event
At 30 days post index procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-hierarchical Composite Safety Endpoint
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure.
Percentage of patients with a non-hierarchical composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, life threatening bleeding requiring blood transfusion, acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, or major vascular complications
30 days from the index procedure.
All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
Percentage of patients with VARC 2 defined all-cause mortality
30 days from the index procedure
Disabling Stroke
Time Frame: 30 days from index procedure
Percentage of patients with a VARC-2 defined disabling stroke event
30 days from index procedure
Life-threatening Bleeding Requiring Blood Transfusion
Time Frame: 30 days from the index procedure
Percentage of patients with a VARC-2 defined life-threatening bleeding event requiring blood transfusion
30 days from the index procedure
Major Bleeding Event
Time Frame: 30 days from index procedure
Percentage of patients with VARC 2 defined major bleeding event
30 days from index procedure
Acute Kidney Injury
Time Frame: 30 days from index procedure
Percentage of patients with a VARC 2 defined acute kidney injury event
30 days from index procedure
Minor Vascular Complication
Time Frame: 30 days from index procedure
Percentage of patients with a VARC-2 defined minor vascular complication
30 days from index procedure
New Permanent Pacemaker Implant
Time Frame: 30 days from index procedure
Percentage of patients requiring a new permanent pacemaker. Excludes patients with a pre-existing permanent pacemaker at baseline
30 days from index procedure
Severity of Paravalvular Leak
Time Frame: 30 days from index procedure
Echocardiographic core-laboratory derived severity of paravalvular leak
30 days from index procedure
NYHA Functional Classification
Time Frame: 30 days from index procedure
Proportion of subjects with a NYHA Functional Class of I,II, III or IV (range I-IV where a lower score indicates less limitation in physical activity)
30 days from index procedure
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Quality of Life (QOL) Score
Time Frame: 30 days from index procedure
KCCQ Overall summary score (range 0-100 where a higher score indicates a better quality of life and physical function)
30 days from index procedure
Technical Device Success
Time Frame: Over the duration of index procedure, an average of 60.6 minutes
Technical device success defined as successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the Portico Valve; retrieval with the delivery system and correct positioning of a single valve in the proper anatomical location.
Over the duration of index procedure, an average of 60.6 minutes
All-Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke
Time Frame: One year (365 days) from index procedure
Percentage of patients with a composite of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at one year from the index procedure censored for COVID-19 related events
One year (365 days) from index procedure
All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: One year (365 days) from index procedure
Percentage of patients that died at one year from the index procedure censored for COVID-19 related endpoint events
One year (365 days) from index procedure
Disabling Stroke
Time Frame: One Year (365 days) from index procedure
Percentage of patients with a disabling stroke at one year from index procedure censored for COVID-19 related endpoint events
One Year (365 days) from index procedure
Severity of Paravalvular Leak
Time Frame: One year from index procedure
Echocardiographic core-laboratory derived severity of paravalvular leak
One year from index procedure
NYHA Functional Classification
Time Frame: One year from index procedure
Proportion of subjects with a NYHA Functional Class of I,II, III or IV (range I-IV where a lower score indicates less limitation in physical activity)
One year from index procedure
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Quality of Life (QOL) Score
Time Frame: One year from index procedure
KCCQ Overall summary score (range 0-100 where a higher score indicates a better quality of life and physical function)
One year from index procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Francesco Bedogni, MD, Policlinico San Donato

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 14, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Portico Valve and FlexNav™ Delivery System

Subscribe