- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03730753
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Infusion in Labour Analgesia
November 28, 2023 updated by: Geneviève Rivard, Université de Sherbrooke
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Infusion When Added to Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia on Bupivacaine Consumption in Labour Analgesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial
This study aims to establish if programmed intermittent epidural bolus combined to patient controlled analgesia in labour analgesia will lower the hourly bupivacaine consumption when compared to continuous infusion combined with patient controlled analgesia.
The investigators' hypothesis is that the use of programmed intermittent epidural bolus will lower the hourly bupivacaine consumption.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients are randomised to receive either a programmed bolus of 6ml each 45 minutes or a continuous infusion of 8ml/h.
In each group, they have the possibility to add a PCEA bolus of 6ml every 20min as needed.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
200
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Isabelle Caron, Dr.
- Phone Number: 5593 +1 819 346-1110
- Email: isabelle.caron4@usherbrooke.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Geneviève Rivard, Dr.
- Phone Number: 14403 +1 819 346-1110
- Email: genevieve.rivard2@usherbrooke.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1H5N4
- Recruiting
- CHUS
-
Contact:
- Genevieve Rivard, FRCPC
- Phone Number: 8195651502
- Email: genevieve.rivard2@usherbrooke.ca
-
Contact:
- Isabelle Caron
- Email: isabelle.caron4@usherbrooke.ca
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant nulliparous or multiparous woman in labour
- Age ≥18 years
- Obtained consent for epidural analgesia
- ASA classification I-II-III
- Early labour (cervical dilation ≤6cm)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy-related comorbidities (preeclampsia, eclampsia, gestational diabetes, large for gestational age fetus)
- Prematurity (<36 weeks of gestation)
- Multiple gestation
- Fentanyl allergy or hypersensitivity
- Patient unable to understand the PCEA
- Fetal breech position
- Maternal cardiac pathology and contraindication to Valsalva manoeuvre
- Patient with a pain visual analog scale (VAS) not ≤1/10 20 minutes after the anesthesiologist's initial bolus
- Intrathecal catheter or intravascular catheter
- Accidental dural puncture
- Patient refusal
- Patient with a history of chronic pain (pain lasting more than 3 months) or fibromyalgia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Control group
Continuous infusion + patient controlled epidural analgesia
|
Continuous infusion added to patient controlled epidural analgesia
|
Experimental: Study group
Programmed intermittent epidural bolus + patient controlled analgesia
|
Programmed intermittent epidural bolus added to patient controlled epidural analgesia
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Dose of bupivacaine in milligrams per hour
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Total dose of bupivacaine in milligrams divided by the total duration of the epidural in hours
|
1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evaluation of pain
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Hourly pain measurement by visual analog scale, 0/10 being no pain and 10/10 being the worst pain imaginable
|
1 day
|
Anesthesiologist manual bolus
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Total boluses by the anesthesiologist
|
1 day
|
PCEA boluses received
Time Frame: 1 day
|
PCEA boluses received
|
1 day
|
PCEA boluses requested
Time Frame: 1 day
|
PCEA boluses requested
|
1 day
|
Time lapse before the first PCEA request after the epidural connection
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Time lapse before the first PCEA request after the epidural connection
|
1 day
|
First stage
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Duration of the first stage of labour
|
1 day
|
Second stage
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Duration of the second stage of labour
|
1 day
|
Assisted vaginal delivery
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Number of assisted vaginal delivery (vacuum, forceps)
|
1 day
|
Cesarean section
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Number of unplanned cesarean section
|
1 day
|
Motor blockade
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Number of patients with a Bromage score ≥1
|
1 day
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Satisfaction of the analgesia provided by the epidural on a visual analog scale of 0-100, 0/100 being no satisfaction at all and 100/100 being entirely satisfied
|
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Geneviève Rivard, Dr., Université de Sherbrooke
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Wong CA, McCarthy RJ, Hewlett B. The effect of manipulation of the programmed intermittent bolus time interval and injection volume on total drug use for labor epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011 Apr;112(4):904-11. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820e7c2f.
- Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S, Farcomeni A. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: the effects on maternal motor function and labor outcome. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women. Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):826-31. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822827b8. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
- George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013 Jan;116(1):133-44. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182713b26. Epub 2012 Dec 7. Erratum In: Anesth Analg. 2013 Jun;116(6):1385.
- Tien M, Allen TK, Mauritz A, Habib AS. A retrospective comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for maintenance of labor analgesia. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Aug;32(8):1435-40. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1181619. Epub 2016 May 20.
- McKenzie CP, Cobb B, Riley ET, Carvalho B. Programmed intermittent epidural boluses for maintenance of labor analgesia: an impact study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016 May;26:32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
- Singer AJ, Thode HC Jr. Determination of the minimal clinically significant difference on a patient visual analog satisfaction scale. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Oct;5(10):1007-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02781.x.
- Wong CA, Ratliff JT, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Toledo P, McCarthy RJ. A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102(3):904-9. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000197778.57615.1a.
- Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo C. Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Oct;14(4):305-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.05.004.
- Chua SM, Sia AT. Automated intermittent epidural boluses improve analgesia induced by intrathecal fentanyl during labour. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Jun-Jul;51(6):581-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03018402.
- Epsztein Kanczuk M, Barrett NM, Arzola C, Downey K, Ye XY, Carvalho JC. Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor: A Biased-Coin Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial to Determine the Optimum Interval Time Between Boluses of a Fixed Volume of 10 mL of Bupivacaine 0.0625% With Fentanyl 2 mug/mL. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):537-541. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001655.
- Liu EH, Sia AT. Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review. BMJ. 2004 Jun 12;328(7453):1410. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38097.590810.7C. Epub 2004 May 28.
- Fettes PD, Moore CS, Whiteside JB, McLeod GA, Wildsmith JA. Intermittent vs continuous administration of epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl for analgesia during labour. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Sep;97(3):359-64. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael157. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
- Lim Y, Chakravarty S, Ocampo CE, Sia AT. Comparison of automated intermittent low volume bolus with continuous infusion for labour epidural analgesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 Sep;38(5):894-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800514.
- Nunes J, Nunes S, Veiga M, Cortez M, Seifert I. A prospective, randomized, blinded-endpoint, controlled study - continuous epidural infusion versus programmed intermittent epidural bolus in labor analgesia. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016 Sep-Oct;66(5):439-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
- Salim R, Nachum Z, Moscovici R, Lavee M, Shalev E. Continuous compared with intermittent epidural infusion on progress of labor and patient satisfaction. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;106(2):301-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000171109.53832.8d.
- Leo S, Ocampo CE, Lim Y, Sia AT. A randomized comparison of automated intermittent mandatory boluses with a basal infusion in combination with patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010 Oct;19(4):357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.07.006. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
- Sia AT, Lim Y, Ocampo C. A comparison of a basal infusion with automated mandatory boluses in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor. Anesth Analg. 2007 Mar;104(3):673-8. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000253236.89376.60.
- Lee L, Dy J, Azzam H. Management of Spontaneous Labour at Term in Healthy Women. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Sep;38(9):843-865. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.04.093. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
- Todd KH, Funk JP. The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog pain scores. Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Feb;3(2):142-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03402.x.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 2, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
November 5, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 30, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 28, 2023
Last Verified
November 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018 - 2686
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
All IPD that underlie results in a publication
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Starting 6 months after publication for 5 years
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
All access requests and criteria will be reviewed by the investigators of this study.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Labor Pain
-
Cukurova UniversityRecruitingLabor Pain, Labor Perception, Hormone Levels and Childbirth ComfortTurkey
-
Soovu Labs Inc.Virginia Mason Hospital/Medical CenterNot yet recruiting
-
Bogomolets National Medical UniversityCompleted
-
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-WittenbergRecruiting
-
Maimonides Medical CenterTerminated
-
Aretaieio HospitalRecruitingLabor Pain | Pain, Labor | EpiduralGreece
-
Mashhad University of Medical SciencesTerminatedDecrease Labor Pain
-
Amasya UniversityAtaturk UniversityNot yet recruitingSatisfaction, Patient | Pain, Labor
-
University Medical Centre LjubljanaCompletedLabor Pain | Labor; Prolonged, First Stage | Labor; Prolonged, Second StageSlovenia
Clinical Trials on Continuous infusion
-
Mongi Slim HospitalCompletedEpidural; AnalgesiaTunisia
-
Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.ACompletedKidney Diseases | Ischemia-Reperfusion InjuryUnited States, France, Italy, Spain
-
Hospital Universitario San IgnacioWithdrawnCritical Illness | Enteral Feeding Intolerance | Nutrition SupportColombia
-
University of Sao PauloUnknownSepsis | Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections | NephrotoxicityBrazil
-
University of California, San DiegoCompletedBreast Cancer | Mastectomy | Paravertebral Catheter InsertionUnited States
-
The George InstituteNational Health and Medical Research Council, Australia; Australian and New...CompletedSepsisBelgium, Australia, United Kingdom, New Zealand, France, Malaysia, Sweden
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterWithdrawnSurgical Site Infections
-
University of VirginiaThe University of QueenslandCompletedPlasma Concentration of AntibioticsUnited States
-
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El...Texas Tech University Health Sciences CenterTerminatedAnalgesia in Total Knee ArthroplastyUnited States
-
The AlfredUnknown