Effectiveness of a Neoprene CMC Joint Orthosis (Carpometacar)

July 29, 2019 updated by: Kristin Valdes, Gannon University

Effectiveness of a Neoprene CMC Joint Orthosis for Pain, Function, and Patient Satisfaction

Patients will be gathered via convenience sample from a hand therapy clinic. They will be provided with a neoprene commercially available orthosis free of charge. Baseline pain and function will be assessed using the VAS and Functional Index of Hand Arthropathies. Four weeks later, pain, function, and patient satisfaction with the device will be gathered using the Quebec User Evaluation of Assistive Technology questionnaire.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients with the diagnosis of carpometacarpal osteoarthritis that are receiving hand therapy will be recruited for the study. Baseline measurements will include usual pain over the past week, current pain, and worst pain experienced over the past week using the VAS pain scale. Hand function will be assessed using the Functional Index of Hand Arthropathies measure. The patients will be provided with a free neoprene hand orthosis (Hely and Weber CMC controller). They will be instructed to wear the device as needed for pain. After 1 month, the investigators will call the patient to assess pain, function, and satisfaction with the device using the Quebec User Evaluation of Assistive Technology Questionnaire.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Ruskin, Florida, United States, 33573
        • Gannon University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with painful CMC OA

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • CMC OA of either thumb with pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CMC arthroplasty
  • recent surgery
  • dementia
  • no pain at CMC joint

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scale
Time Frame: 1 month
Pain measured with VAS pain scale, measured from 1-10. 1 is the best and 10 is the worst
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hand osteoarthritis Function
Time Frame: 1 month
Function measured with FIHOA.The FIHOA assesses hand OA-related functional impairment scoring from 0 (no functional impairment) to 30 points (maximal impairment).The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with a validated threshold of 5 able to distinguish between symptomatic and not symptomatic patients or controls.
1 month
Patient satisfaction with device: Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
Time Frame: 1 month
Measured with QUEST scale. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) is a 12-item outcome measure that assesses user satisfaction with two components, Device and Services. Scores of 1 indicate dissatisfaction and scores of 5 indicate high satisfaction
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Gannon University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GUIRB-2018-8-66

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on CMC

Clinical Trials on Orthosis provision

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Slovenia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe