- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03739944
Different Surgical Approaches in Patients of Early-stage Cervical Cancer
December 26, 2018 updated by: Lei Li
Randomized Trial of Different Surgical Approaches in Patients of Chinese Early-stage Cervical Cancer
This multi-center, randomized controlled study aims to compare the survival outcomes (including overall survival, progression-free survival and disease-free survival between Chinese uterine cervical patients receiving different surgical routes (laparotomy and laparoscopy) for radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy, which is the primary study objective.
All patients with uterine cervical cancer of FIGO stage IA1 (with lymphovascular space invasion), IA2 and IB1 will be included and randomized into two groups: laparotomy and laparoscopy groups for radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy.
Secondary study objectives include: patterns of recurrence, treatment-associated morbidity (6 months from surgery), cost-effectiveness, pelvic floor function, and quality of life.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
700
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
- Recruiting
- Lei Li
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Confirmed primary adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix
- FIGO stage IA1 (with lymphovascular space invasion), IA2 or IB1
- Type II or III radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy
- Performance status of ECOG 0-1
- Aged 18 years or older
- Signed an approved informed consents
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not satisfying any of the inclusion criteria
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Laparotomic radical hysterectomy
|
Laparotomic radical hysterectomy for patients without fertility requirement
|
|
Active Comparator: Laparotomic radical trachelectomy
|
Laparotomic radical hysterectomy for patients with fertility requirement
|
|
Active Comparator: Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy
|
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for patients without fertility requirement
|
|
Active Comparator: Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy
|
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for patients with fertility requirement
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: Five years
|
The length of time during and after the treatment of a disease, such as cancer, that a patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse.
|
Five years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall survival
Time Frame: Five years
|
The length of time from either the date of diagnosis or the start of treatment for a disease, such as cancer, that patients diagnosed with the disease are still alive.
|
Five years
|
|
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: Five years
|
In cancer, the length of time after primary treatment for a cancer ends that the patient survives without any signs or symptoms of that cancer.
|
Five years
|
|
Morbidity rate
Time Frame: Six months
|
Refers to having a disease or a symptom of disease, or to the amount of disease within a population.
In this study, morbidity of six months from the surgery is defined according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03
|
Six months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cost-effectiveness of different surgical routes
Time Frame: One year
|
The direct cost of different surgical routes
|
One year
|
|
Quality of life
Time Frame: Three years
|
The quality of life measured by academic questionnaire
|
Three years
|
|
Sex function
Time Frame: Five years
|
Sex function measured by academic questionnaire before and after surgeries
|
Five years
|
|
Urodynamics
Time Frame: Five years
|
Urinary functions are measured by dynamic tests before and after surgeries
|
Five years
|
|
Rectal functions
Time Frame: Five years
|
Rectal functions are measured by dynamic tests before and after surgeries
|
Five years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Chao X, Li L, Wu M, Wu H, Ma S, Tan X, Zhong S, Lang J. Minimally invasive versus open radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial in China. Trials. 2020 Dec 14;21(1):1022. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04938-3.
- Ferrandina G, Corrado G, Scambia G. Minimally invasive surgery and quality of life in cervical cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):746-748. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30161-3. No abstract available.
- Chao X, Li L, Wu M, Ma S, Tan X, Zhong S, Lang J, Cheng A, Li W. Efficacy of different surgical approaches in the clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial in China. BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 29;9(7):e029055. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029055.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 23, 2018
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
November 23, 2022
Study Completion (Anticipated)
November 23, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 9, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
November 14, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 28, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 26, 2018
Last Verified
December 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RACC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
The data will be available to all the researches via public websites.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The data will be available once the papers were accepted and be available for ever
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruitingQuality of Life | Postoperative Quality of Recovery | Health-Related Quality-of-LifeBelgium
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaCompletedImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
Children's National Research InstituteCompletedProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Mattu UniversityCompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life ofEthiopia
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Institute of Oncology LjubljanaUnknownHealth-related Quality of LifeSlovenia
-
Oslo University HospitalNorwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in PhysiotherapyCompletedHealth-Related Quality of LifeNorway
Clinical Trials on Laparotomic radical hysterectomy
-
Lei LiRecruitingRecurrence | Uterine Cervical Neoplasms | Mortality | Laparotomy | Laparoscopy | SurvivalChina
-
Southern Medical University, ChinaRecruiting
-
Chen ChunlinUnknownCervical CancerChina
-
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteCompletedSurgery--Complications
-
Zagazig UniversityCompletedCervical CancerEgypt
-
Queensland Centre for Gynaecological CancerM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterCompletedCervical CancerUnited States, China, Korea, Republic of, Australia, Canada, Italy, Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Puerto Rico
-
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical UniversityTumor Hospital of Xin Jiang Medical University,China; Gui Yang Maternal and... and other collaboratorsUnknown
-
Karolinska InstitutetRecruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalNational Cancer Center, Korea; Samsung Medical Center; Asan Medical Center; Ajou... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingCervical Cancer Stage IB2 | Cervical Cancer Stage IIaSouth Korea
-
Hospital Nossa Senhora da ConceicaoCompletedCervical Cancer | Postoperative PainBrazil