Evaluation of the ScalpelCric Set and Comparison With Two Further Techniques of Cricothyrotomy

February 16, 2019 updated by: Nina Pirlich, Dr. med., Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Evaluation of the Novel ScalpelCric Set for Cricothyrotomy Corresponding the Scalpel-Bougie Technique and Comparison With Two Further Techniques of Cricothyrotomy on a Plastic Laryngeal Model (A) and Comparison of the Novel ScalpelCric Set With Surgical Cricothyrotomy in a Porcine Laryngeal Model (B) Influence of Training (A+B) in a Simulation

During a cannot ventilate cannot intubate situation surgical airway is the last rescue option. Especially in the prehospital setting the airway management seems to be more difficult than in a hospital setting. Nearly all emergency physicians have a limited experience with cricothyrotomy and it is a unclear what method should be taught for this lifesaving procedure, due to lack of data in humans. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of medical personnel (medical students, paramedics, trainee anaesthetists and consultants) in establishing an emergency surgical airway on a plastic laryngeal model and in a porcine laryngeal model using the Scalpel Bougie technique, the Seldinger technique and the common surgical technique.

Furthermore the investigators want to elucidate whether the training of the 3 techniques has an influence in the decision making of the preferred technique in a subsequently simulated cannot ventilate cannot intubate scenario.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators plan to recruit medical students (University Mainz), paramedics (employed in ambulance and rescue helicopter), trainee anaesthetists and consultants of the department of anesthesiology from the university hospital Mainz. After written informed consent the participants have to complete an pre-study questionnaire, than the participants get an information sheet about the 3 techniques and the investigators show the participants a short video demonstrating the different techniques. All participants have the opportunity to practice one insertion with each method on a plastic laryngeal model.

After that the participants have to perform each technique on the plastic model and the investigators measure the time from initially handling equipment to the final end-point, which the investigators take as a successful placement of the endotracheal tube verified by a fiberoptic position check.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rhineland Palatine
      • Mainz, Rhineland Palatine, Germany, 55131
        • Johannes Gutenberg University Medicine Centre Mainz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Medical students (University Mainz), paramedics (DRK, MHD, ASB, ADAC), trainee anaesthetists and consultants (Department of anaesthesiology University hospital Mainz)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • written informed consent
  • German language in speaking and writing
  • Capability of giving consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants unwilling or unable to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time from initially handling equipment to a successful placement of the endotracheal tube verified by a fiberoptic position check
Time Frame: up to 3 minutes
up to 3 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate in the first trial
Time Frame: up to 3 minutes
up to 3 minutes
Number of trials
Time Frame: up to 3 minutes
up to 3 minutes
Dimension of the tracheal trauma
Time Frame: up to 10 minutes
horizontally and vertically in mm
up to 10 minutes
Comfort evaluation by the performer
Time Frame: up to 15 minutes
Likert-Scale: 1=very easy, 2=easy, 3=difficult, 4=very difficult
up to 15 minutes
Influence of training on the time to decision making for cricothyrotomy
Time Frame: up to 5 hours
After performing the different techniques of cricothyrotomy on a platistic and a porcine laryngeal model, the participants will complete a simulator training for a cannot intubate and cannot ventilate scenario. Time to decide (measured in seconds) to perform cricothyrotomy will be measured from the beginning of the scenario.
up to 5 hours
Influence of training on choosing the technique
Time Frame: up to 5 hours
After performing the different techniques of cricothyrotomy on a platistic and a porcine laryngeal model, the participants will complete a simulator training for a cannot intubate and cannot ventilate scenario. The technique (Scalpel bougie, seldinger, surgical) of cricotyrotomy, chosen by the participant will be reported and compared with the preferred technique, the participant had chosen before performing the training.
up to 5 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 13, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-13819

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cricothyroidotomy

Clinical Trials on Scalpel Bougie technique (plastic laryngeal model)

Subscribe