Prone Positioning and Spontaneous Breathing (PROSE)

May 13, 2020 updated by: Osaka University

Prone Positioning and Spontaneous Breathing: a Feasibility Study

Spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation has been recommended in patients with ARDS and is currently used. in part because oxygenation is better and there is a lower risk of diaphragm dysfunction due to disuse. The other approach to minimizing lung injury from spontaneous effort is the use of neuromuscular blockade; an early and short term (48 hours) of neuromuscular blockade in patients with severe ARDS has been shown to decrease inflammation and to improve survival. The investigators propose a pilot study to test the feasibility and the physiological effects of allowing spontaneous breathing in the prone position in patients with ARDS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The multi-center feasibility study will enroll 12 adult ARDS patients from the Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in Japan and Peru. Informed consent will be obtained from the patient or legally authorized substitute decision maker. Moderate-to-severe ARDS patients who are planned to turn to prone positioning, based on the attending physician's decisions will be included. Prior to initiating the protocol, patients will be sedated deeply with sedatives and/or opioids. Ventilator settings, physiological data, esophageal pressure and diaphragm activity will be recorded and physiological measurements will be collected for 5 minutes in supine (Measurement 1: Supine + spontaneous effort) . Patients will be paralyzed with a continuous infusion of rocuronium, and Measurement 2 (Supine + paralysis) will be recorded. The critical care team in the ICU change the position from supine to prone. After waiting for at least 1 hour in prone positioning, Measurement 3 (Prone + paralysis) will be recorded. Continuous infusion of rocuronium will be gradually decreased (and can be terminated) until spontaneous breathing will be observed without reaching an excessive level. The presence of spontaneous breathing will be evaluated by the negative swing of esophageal pressure, and Measurement 5 (Prone + spontaneous breathing) will be recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

12

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Osaka
      • Suita, Osaka, Japan, 565-0871
        • Osaka University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≧ 18 years old
  • Patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS as per the Berlin definition
  • Patients with esophageal balloon manometry
  • Patients planned to turn to prone positioning, based on the attending physician's decisions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication for prone positioning, referring to a previous randomized clinical trial

    1. Intracranial pressure >30 mm Hg or cerebral perfusion pressure <60 mmHg
    2. Massive hemoptysis requiring an immediate surgical or interventional radiology procedure
    3. Tracheal surgery or sternotomy during the previous 15 days
    4. Serious facial trauma or facial surgery during the previous 15 days
    5. Cardiac pacemaker inserted in the last 2 days
    6. Unstable spine, femur, or pelvic fractures
  • Major hemodynamic instability:

Mean arterial pressure lower than 60 mm Hg despite adequate fluid resuscitation and two vasopressors or increase of vasopressor dose by 30% in the previous 6 hours.

  • Contraindication to EIT electrode placement Burns, chest wall bandaging limiting electrode placement, pacemaker
  • Clinical judgement of the attending physician against proning and/or spontaneous breathing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: study arm
all patients will receive all four intervention in the same sequential method
without muscle paralysis in supine position
administer muscle paralysis in supine position
change the patient position from supine to prone with muscle paralysis
cease the paralysis in supine position

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
spontaneous breathing
Time Frame: Through study completion (up to 24 hours)
The intensity of spontaneous breathing during supine vs. prone estimated by an esophageal manometry
Through study completion (up to 24 hours)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
inflammatory cytokines
Time Frame: Through study completion (up to 24 hours)
IL-6 levels
Through study completion (up to 24 hours)
Trans-pulmonary pressure
Time Frame: Through study completion (up to 24 hours)
Trans-pulmonary pressure
Through study completion (up to 24 hours)
electrical activity of diaphragm
Time Frame: Through study completion (up to 24 hours)
electrical activity of diaphragm
Through study completion (up to 24 hours)
gas exchange
Time Frame: Through study completion (up to 24 hours)
gas exchange
Through study completion (up to 24 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Takeshi Yoshida, PhD, Osaka University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 8, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PROSE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Supine + spontaneous effort

Subscribe