Patient-Specific Precision Injury Signatures in Multiply Injured Orthopaedic Patients (PRECISE)

October 17, 2023 updated by: Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium

A Multi-Center, Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Use of Patient-Specific Precision Injury Signatures to Optimize Orthopaedic Interventions in Multiply Injured Patients

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of precision methods that quantify injury and response to injury to predict how short-term clinical outcomes are affected by initial and staged orthopaedic interventions in multiply injured patients (MIPs) who sustain major orthopaedic trauma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is currently a knowledge gap regarding in the treatment of the severely injured MIP, as clinicians are often challenged by when non-life threatening orthopaedic procedures should be performed. Information to guide orthopaedic interventions in MIPs is based primarily on resuscitation parameters and injury severity metrics.Lack of consensus among surgeons regarding choices of orthopaedic interventions reflects the paucity of data to form treatment decisions.

This study will define the key parameters affecting these decisions in a quantitative manner by exploring the efficacy of a precision medicine approach to guide surgical decisions in multiply injured patients (MIPs) with skeletal trauma. According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH),36 precision medicine is "an emerging approach for disease treatment and prevention that takes into account individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle for each person." This approach will allow clinicians and researchers to predict more accurately which treatment and prevention strategies for a particular disease will work in which groups of people. The application of precision medicine will bring to bear evidence-based tools that can guide decisions facing the treating surgeons regarding the optimal timing of definitive fracture surgery after injury, as well as defining the magnitude of surgical intervention which may be pursued without engendering clinical complications.

Specific Aim 1: Define groups of patients based on Precision Injury Signatures (mechanical and ischemic injury characteristics and immunologic response profile) that correspond to the following short term clinical outcomes;

  1. Multiple organ dysfunction
  2. Nosocomial infection
  3. Wound complications
  4. Resource utilization (ICU/hospital LOS, days on mechanical ventilation, discharge disposition)
  5. Death

Hypothesis 1: Patients who develop complicated short term outcomes will demonstrate distinct Precision Injury Signatures compared to patients who have uncomplicated outcomes for injuries of similar magnitude.

Specific Aim 2: Evaluate the impact of timing and magnitude of orthopaedic surgical interventions on progression of patient-specific physiologic and immunologic response. Describe changes in physiologic and immunologic response after initial and staged orthopaedic interventions.

Hypothesis 2: Immunologic and physiologic response to surgery will be a function of initial Precision Injury Signature and timing/magnitude of orthopaedic surgical interventions.

Specific Aim 3: To develop surgical decision rules related to timing of definitive orthopaedic intervention that optimize short term clinical outcomes.

Hypothesis 3a: Initial Precision Injury Signatures can be used to identify orthopaedic trauma patients who are best treated with early definitive treatment or staged definitive intervention.

Hypothesis 3b: Progression of Precision Injury Signatures can be used to determine optimal timing and choices of definitive orthopaedic interventions.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

320

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33101
        • University of Miami Ryder Trauma Center
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Methodist Hospital/Indiana University
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
        • University of Kentucky Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 28232
        • Carolinas Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • UT Health: The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
        • University of Washington Harborview Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult (18-55) patients sustaining multiple injuries, including at least one qualifying orthopaedic injury to the pelvis, acetabulum, femur, or diaphyseal tibia.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult ages 18 years old to 55 years old inclusive;
  2. Direct admission to hospital from scene of injury, or if transferred, admitted no more than 6 hours from injury
  3. Full trauma activation with either direct admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or other higher level of care, or taken directly to surgery and admitted to ICU after surgery;
  4. Sustaining at least one operative orthopaedic injury to the pelvis, acetabulum, femur, or diaphyseal tibia with planned definitive fixation to occur prior to discharge.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-survivable head trauma.
  2. Signs of severe traumatic brain injury indicated by a GCS of < 7 at the time of admission and no improvement in the GCS by the time of consent.
  3. Spinal cord injury with likely permanent neurologic deficits
  4. Pre-existing organ dysfunction or failure prior to their injury, including but not limited to end-stage renal disease, liver failure, congestive heart failure, or severe COPD requiring home oxygen.
  5. Qualifying orthopaedic injury primarily a periarticular fracture (tibial pilon or plateau) with planned delay to definitive fixation for soft tissue reasons.
  6. Primary blood draw could not be obtained within 3 hours of presentation
  7. Patient is pregnant
  8. Patient is a prisoner/incarcerated
  9. Patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) unable to provide consent prior to 48 hour blood draw.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Group 1
Multiply injured patients having at least one operative orthopaedic injury to the pelvis, acetabulum, femur, or diaphyseal tibia with planned definitive fixation to occur prior to discharge.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical outcomes recorded during 6month post injury medical record review
Time Frame: 6 months post injury
Number of occurrences of multiple organ dysfunction, nosocomial infection, wound complications, resource utilization and death as noted in medical record review.
6 months post injury

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Todd McKinley, MD, Indiana University/Methodist Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 00008259

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic, Acetabular, Femur, or Diaphyseal Tibial Operative Orthopaedic Injuries

3
Subscribe