Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Autologous MSCs Combined to Biomaterials to Enhance Bone Healing (OrthoCT1)

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Autologous MSCs Combined to Biomaterials to Enhance Bone Healing in Patients With Delayed Consolidation After Long Bone Fracture Requiring Graft Apposition or Alternative Orthobiologics

Bone grafting is widely used in hospitals to repair injured, aged or diseased skeletal tissue. In Europe, about one million patients encounter a surgical bone reconstruction annually and the numbers are increasing due to our ageing population. Bone grafting intends to facilitate bone healing through osteogenesis (i.e. bone generation) at the site of damage, but this is only attained presently by including cells capable of forming bone into the augmentation.

Bone autograft is the safest and most effective grafting procedure, since it contains patient's own bone growing cells (to enhance osteogenesis) and proteins (to enhance osteoinduction), and it providing a scaffold for the new bone to grow into (osteoconduction). However, bone autograft is limited in quantity (about 20 cc) and its harvesting (e.g. from the iliac crest) represents an additional surgical intervention, with frequent consequent pain and complications.

We hypothesize that using autologous bone marrow cells expanded in GMP facility surgically implanted with synthetic bone substitutes contribute to the resolution of the health and socioeconomic complications of delayed union or non-union after diaphyseal and metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures with safety and efficacy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Tissue engineering combines bone marrow cells or mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), synthetic scaffolds and molecular signals (growth or differentiating factors) in order to form hybrids constructs. For bone reconstruction purposes, human MSCs have been seeded and cultured on porous calcium phosphate ceramics in osteogenic media. Some clinical studies with low numbers of patients have been reported using this approach but the outcomes were inconsistent with low efficacy in bone regeneration. The reasons of the limited clinical success may be due to several bottlenecks in the multidisciplinary field of bone tissue engineering. The association in vitro of biomaterials and osteoprogenitor cells raises technical challenges and regulatory and ethic issues for the implementation of clinical trials, whereas the expansion of MSCs is now possible in GMP Facility.

The expected results are to obtain bone consolidation thus healing of delayed union or non-union, as proven by imaging techniques, without using bone graft. This will prove the efficacy of the proposed IMP based on pluripotent MSCs expanded in a GMP facility and mixed with granulated biphasic calcium phosphate in the surgical setting before implantation. No expected complications related to the procedure are expected. Changes in serum levels of bone turnover markers will be described.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Créteil, France, 94000
        • Depatment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital Henri Mondor
      • Tours, France, 37044
        • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CHRU Tours
      • Ulm, Germany, 89081
        • Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, University of Ulm
      • Bologna, Italy, 40136
        • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología "A", Hospital La Paz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 65, both sexes
  • Traumatic isolated closed or open Gustilo I and II humerus, tibial or femur diaphyseal or metaphyseal-diaphyseal fracture status delayed union or non-union
  • At least 3 months from acute fracture
  • Able to provide informed consent, and signed informed consent
  • Patients (by themselves) should have medical health care coverage to be included in a research study
  • Able to understand and accept the study constraints

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy, breast feeding women and women who are of childbearing age and not practicing adequate birth control
  • Participation in another therapeutic trial in the previous 3 months
  • Delayed union or non-union related to iatrogeny
  • Segmental bone loss requiring specific therapy (bone transport, large structural allograft, megaprosthesis, etc)
  • Vascular or neural injury
  • Other fractures causing interference with weight bearing
  • Acute persistent chronic bacterial infections such as brucellosis, typhus, leprosy, relapsing fever, melioidosis and tularemia
  • Visceral injuries of diseases interfering with callus formation (cranioencephalic trauma, etc.)
  • History of bone harvesting on iliac crest contraindicating bone-marrow aspiration
  • Corticoid or immunosuppressive therapy more than one week in the three months prior to study inclusion
  • History of prior or concurrent diagnosis of HIV-, Syphilis, Hepatitis-B- or Hepatitis-C-infection (confirmed by serology or PCR)
  • History of neoplasia or current neoplasia in any organ
  • Subject legally protected, under legal guardianship, deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision, subject of psychiatric care, or admission to a health facility.
  • Impossibility to meet at the appointments for the follow up
  • Insulin dependent diabetes
  • Obesity (BMI > 30)
  • Autoimmune inflammatory disease
  • Current treatment by biphosphonate or stopped in the three months prior to study inclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Implantation surgery
All the patients will have the implantation surgery. This trial is a one-arm study.
Implantation surgery of a synthetic bone substitute associated with autologous bone marrow cells expanded

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Complication rate as percentage of patients with local complications regarding the non-union treatment in the follow-up
Time Frame: At 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 52 weeks after the implantation surgery
At 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 52 weeks after the implantation surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of patients with proven bone healing
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the implantation surgery
6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the implantation surgery
Amount of radiological callus
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the implantation surgery
6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the implantation surgery
Clinical consolidation
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after implantation surgery
6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after implantation surgery
No reoperation done or scheduled
Time Frame: 24 weeks after implantation surgery
24 weeks after implantation surgery
Changes in serum levels of bone turnover markers
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the implantation surgery
6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the implantation surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Enrique Gomez Barrena, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 5, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 5, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 29, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • C11-12
  • 2011-005441-13 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Delayed Union After Fracture of Humerus, Tibial or Femur

Clinical Trials on Implantation of bone substitute plus autologous cultured mesenchymal cells

3
Subscribe