Pain Education vs. Self-management Associated With Movement Control Exercises for Chronic Low Back Pain

February 27, 2019 updated by: Thais Cristina Chaves, University of Sao Paulo

Pain Neuroscience Education vs. Self-management Programs Associated With Movement Control Exercises for Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

The primary aim of this study is to compare the effects of an exercise program based on movement control exercises associated with self-management advice (SME) or pain neuroscience education (PNE) on the outcomes of pain intensity and pain disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CLBP).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants: One hundred and four volunteers (104) aged 18-50 years with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Interventions: The volunteers will be randomized into two treatment groups: self-management education and movement control exercises or pain neuroscience education and exercises based on movement control exercises. Two workshops of 40 minutes each will be administered as education approach and the exercise program along 2 months ( and 12 sessions distributed over 2 months.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes will include pain intensity and low back disability, and secondary outcomes will be pain catastrophizing, pain self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, exercise adherence and global perceived effect. These will be measured pre- and post-intervention and at the 1-month follow-up. Statistical analysis will be conducted following treatment intent principles, and treatment effects will be calculated using a mixed linear model, considering intervention groups as a factor and assessments over time as repeated measures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Paraná
      • Jacarezinho, Paraná, Brazil
        • Recruiting
        • Physical Therapy Clinic
        • Contact:
          • Tiago Del Antônio, PhD
    • São Paulo
      • Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, 14049-900
        • Recruiting
        • University of Sao Paulo
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

(1) non-specific chronic low back pain with a mechanical constituent caused by certain postures, activities, and movements, in addition to having at least 3 months of pain and/or episodes for at least half the previous 6 days, located between T12 and the gluteal folds; (2) pain intensity scores greater than 2 and greater than 14% on the Oswestry Low Back Disability Index and (3) positive results in 2 or more of the 6 tests to determine movement control impairment.

Exclusion Criteria:

(1) red flags such as tumors or neoplastic diseases in the spine, inflammatory diseases, infections, and fractures; (2) central and peripheral, psychiatric, rheumatologic, and cardiac neurological diseases; (3) acute and symptomatic radiculopathy, lumbar stenosis, and spondylolisthesis; (4) pregnant women; and (5) individuals submitted to physiotherapeutic treatment during the last 6 months. Finally, volunteers will be advised about the non-use of pain medications 24 hours before the evaluations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pain Neuroscience Education + Exercises
The PNE will follow the principles established by Explain Pain, addressing reconceptualization of pain, emphasizing modern neuroscience concepts. The PNE workshop will last 40 minutes (2 sessions). The movement control exercises will consist of active exercises that address posture and control of movements which are impaired and trigger pain. The session will last approximately 30 minutes, starting with the execution of the coordination exercises in the control of movement with an intensity of 10 to 30 repetitions and then performing exercises for stretching in 3 series of 30 seconds. Finally, strengthening exercises in 3 sets of 15 repetitions will be implemented. The exercises will be administered 1 session/week (volunteers will be oriented to execute the same exercises at home twice a week). The volunteers will receive 8 sessions at the clinic.
Pain neuroscience education (2 sessions during 40 minutes) administered by an interactive workshop
Eight sessions of movement control exercises (30 minutes each) + advice to perform the exercises at home twice a week.
Active Comparator: Self-Management Education + Exercises
The Self-Management Education (SME) strategy will be aligned with the "Back Book" concepts, focused on behavior change and encouraging participants to be active despite of the pain. The SME workshop will last 40 minutes (2 sessions). The movement control exercises will consist of active exercises that address posture and control of movements which are impaired and trigger pain. The session will last approximately 30 minutes, starting with the execution of the coordination exercises in the control of movement with an intensity of 10 to 30 repetitions and then performing exercises for stretching in 3 series of 30 seconds. Finally, strengthening exercises in 3 sets of 15 repetitions will be implemented. The exercises will be administered 1 session/week (volunteers will be oriented to execute the same exercises at home twice a week). The volunteers will receive 8 sessions at the clinic.
Eight sessions of movement control exercises (30 minutes each) + advice to perform the exercises at home twice a week.
A self-management education (2 sessions during 40 minutes) administered by an interactive workshop

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity - Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: Immediately after and at 1-month follow-up
The NPRS used to assess pain intensity in this trial will consist in a sequence of numbers from 0 to 10, in which 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst pain imaginable". Previous research has found the NPRS to be responsive to change, with a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of 2.4 among patients with CLBP receiving exercise or education.
Immediately after and at 1-month follow-up
Low Back Pain Disability
Time Frame: Immediately after and at 1-month follow-up
The Brazilian Portuguese version of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) will be used to assess low back pain related disability. This instrument consists of 10 items, each of which has six response options. The total score will be calculated by summing up all the points, with the largest possible sum being 50. This sum will be transformed into a percentage by multiplying it by two. Previous research has found that ODI showed responsiveness to change for patients with CLBP, with MCID of 8 points.
Immediately after and at 1-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Catastrophizing
Time Frame: Immediately after and at 1-month follow-up
Validated and translated to Brazilian-Portuguese, the Pain Catastrophizing scale (Br-PCS) is a self-administered questionnaire that presents 13 questions, divided into 3 domains: helplessness, magnification, and rumination. The scale has 5 points: 0 (minimum); 1 (slight); 2 (moderate); 3 (intense); and 4 (very intense). The final score ranges from 0 to 52 points, with the psychological risk being directly proportional to higher scores.
Immediately after and at 1-month follow-up
Pain Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Immediately after and at 1-month follow-up
Validated for Brazilian-Portuguese, the Pain Self-Efficacy Scale (PSE) presents 10 questions scored from 0 (Not at all confident) to 6 (Completely confident). The score achieved on this scale can range from 0 to 60, higher values reflecting stronger self-efficacy beliefs.
Immediately after and at 1-month follow-up
Fear Avoidance Beliefs
Time Frame: Immediately after and at 1-month follow-up
Validated and translated to Brazilian-Portuguese, the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-Brazil) is composed of 16 self-report items, subdivided into the FABQ-Phys, addressing beliefs related to occupational activities, and the FABQ-Work, work-related beliefs. However, the FABQ-Work score should be measured by adding items 6,7,9,10,11,12, and 15 with a score ranging from 0 to 42 and the FABQ-Phys through the sum of items 2,3,4, and 5, with the score ranging from 0 to 24 points.
Immediately after and at 1-month follow-up
Exercise Adherence
Time Frame: at the beginning of following session, immediately after and at 1-month follow-up
We will administer the Brazilian Portuguese version of the scale cross-culturally adapted. The tool is comprised of 16 items, 6 items directly assessing behavior adherence (Section B), while 10 additional items related to non-adherence reasons (Section C). The 16 items were classified using an ordinal scale of 5 possible answers (0 = strongly agree to 4 = totally disagree) with a possible score range from 0 to 64. A higher overall adherence score indicated better adherence to exercise.
at the beginning of following session, immediately after and at 1-month follow-up
Global Perceived Effect
Time Frame: Immediately after and at 1-month follow-up
The Global Perceived Effect Scale has the purpose of investigating musculoskeletal features, where the patient has the capacity to report improvement or deterioration over time, usually used to measure the effect of a therapy with the question: "Compared to when this episode began, how would you describe your low back currently?" Scored from -5 (much worse) to +5 (fully recovered), higher scores indicate improvement in the condition.
Immediately after and at 1-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Thais Chaves, PhD, Professor - Ribeirão Preto Medical School - University of São Paulo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 69172017.1.0000.5440

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe