A Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of CT-P17 With Humira in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

October 20, 2021 updated by: Celltrion

A Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of CT-P17 With Humira When Co-administered With Methotrexate in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

This is a Phase III Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of CT-P17 with Humira in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

CT-P17, containing the active ingredient adalimumab, is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that is being developed as a similar biological medicinal product to Humira. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety of CT-P17 and Humira in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis when co-administered with methotrexate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

648

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • National Multiprofile Transport Hospital Tsar Boris III

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is male or female aged 18 to 75 years old, both inclusive.
  • Patient has had a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology(ACR)/EULAR classification criteria for at least 24 weeks prior to the first administration of the study drug .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who has previously received investigational or licensed product; biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and/or a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α inhibitor for any purposes.
  • Patient who has allergies to any of the excipients of study drug or any other murine and human proteins, or patient with a hypersensitivity to immunoglobulin products.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CT-P17 Subcutaneous(SC) (adalimumab)
CT-P17 SC (adalimumab)
Subcutaneous injection of Adalimumab 40mg every two weeks
Active Comparator: Humira SC (adalimumab)
Subcutaneous injection of Adalimumab 40mg every two weeks
Subcutaneous injection of Adalimumab 40mg every two weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American College of Rheumatology(ACR)20 Response Rate at Week 24.
Time Frame: Week 24
ACR20 is defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in the three of the following five criteria: 1) patient global assessment of disease activity, 2) physician global assessment of disease activity, 3) functional ability measure using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), 4) visual analog pain scale, and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP)
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ACR50 and ACR70 Response Rate at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
ACR50 and ACR70 are the same instruments with improvement levels defined as 50% and 70% respectively versus 20% for ACR20.
Week 24
ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Response Rate up to Week 52
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
ACR20 is defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in the three of the following five criteria: 1) patient global assessment of disease activity, 2) physician global assessment of disease activity, 3) functional ability measure using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), 4) visual analog pain scale, and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP). ACR50 and ACR70 are the same instruments with improvement levels defined as 50% and 70% respectively versus 20% for ACR20.
Up to Week 52
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Measured by DAS28 (CRP)
Time Frame: Week 24

The Disease activity score (DAS28) (c-reactive protein [CRP]) score was derived using the following formulae:

DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) + 0.28*√(SJC28) + 0.014*(GH) + 0.36*ln(CRP+1) + 0.96

Where:

TJC28 = 28 joint count for tenderness (0-28) SJC28 = 28 joint count for swelling (0-28) Ln (CRP) = natural logarithm of CRP (mg/L : 0.2-236.3 as observed in the study) GH = General Health component of the DAS (patient's global assessment of disease activity) (mm: 0-100).

DAS28 (CRP) values range from 1.03 to 8.77 while higher values mean a higher disease activity.

Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Measured by DAS28 (CRP)
Time Frame: Up to Week 52

The Disease activity score (DAS28) (c-reactive protein [CRP]) score was derived using the following formulae:

DAS28 (CRP) = 0.56*√(TJC28) + 0.28*√(SJC28) + 0.014*(GH) + 0.36*ln(CRP+1) + 0.96

Where:

TJC28 = 28 joint count for tenderness (0-28) SJC28 = 28 joint count for swelling (0-28) Ln (CRP) = natural logarithm of CRP (mg/L : 0.2-236.3 as observed in the study) GH = General Health component of the DAS (patient's global assessment of disease activity) (mm: 0-100).

DAS28 (CRP) values range from 1.03 to 8.77 while higher values mean a higher disease activity.

Up to Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: MinJi Ma, Celltrion, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 8, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 24, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on CT-P17 SC

3
Subscribe