Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Cytrellis Micro-Coring Device for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Facial Wrinkles

January 2, 2019 updated by: Cytrellis Biosystems, Inc.

A Prospective, Multi-center, Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Cytrellis Micro-Coring Device for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Facial Wrinkles

Study evaluating the efficacy of a micro coring device for the treatment of moderate to severe check wrinkles

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Up to 35 subjects who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be treated. All subjects will be monitored for a period of 90 days post treatment.

Study results will be assessed with the following:

  • Lemperle Scale
  • Investigator GAIS Scale
  • Subject Satisfaction Scale

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Laser and Skin Surgery Center of Northern California
    • Colorado
      • Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States, 80111
        • Not yet recruiting
        • AboutSkin Research, LLC
        • Contact:
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33173
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Miami Dermatology & Laser Institute
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Recruiting
        • Laser and Skin Surgery of New York
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Roy Geronemus
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Active, not recruiting
        • The Office of Brian Biesman, M.D.
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jay Burns

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females 40-70 years of age
  • Fitzpatrick Skin Type I to IV as judged by the Investigator
  • Cheek areas are at least a score of 3 using the Lemperle Wrinkle Assessment Scale as judged by the Investigator
  • Able to provide written informed consent, understand and willing to comply with all study related procedures and follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lesions suspicious for any malignancy or the presence of actinic keratosis, melasma, vitiligo, cutaneous papules/nodules or active inflammatory lesions in the areas to be treated
  • History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring
  • History of trauma or surgery to the treatment areas in the past 6 months
  • Scar present in the areas to be treated
  • Silicone injections in the areas to be treated
  • Injection of dermal fillers, fat or botulinum toxin, as well as any minimally invasive/invasive medical device for skin treatment, in the study treatment areas, within the past 6 months (i.e., dermabrasion, laser, RF devices)
  • Active smokers (0.5 pack/day) or having quit within 3 months prior to treatment
  • Active, chronic, or recurrent infection
  • History of compromised immune system or currently being treated with immunosuppressive agents
  • History of sensitivity to analgesic agents, Aquaphor®, topical or local anesthetics (e.g., lidocaine, benzocaine, procaine) or chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine or epinephrine
  • Excessive sun exposure and use of tanning beds or tanning creams within 30 days prior to treatment
  • Treatment with aspirin or other blood thinning agents within 14 days prior to treatment
  • History or presence of any clinically significant bleeding disorder
  • Any issue that, at the discretion of the Investigator, would interfere with assessment of safety or efficacy or compromise the subject's ability to participate in the study
  • Treatment with an investigational device or agent within 30 days before treatment or during the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Micro-exisional skin removal
Micro-coring of skin on the facial and neck areas will be conducted in one treatment and followed for 90 days post treatment.
Micro coring skin removal with automated coring device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess level of wrinkle improvement using the Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale
Time Frame: 90 day post treatment

A mean change of 1 point or greater reduction in cheek wrinkle severity at 90 days post treatment using the Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale, as assessed by (3) blinded Independent Reviewers Lemperle Scale:

No wrinkles =0 Just perceptible wrinkles =1 Shallow wrinkles=2 Moderately deep wrinkles=3 Deep wrinkles, well-defined edges =4 Very deep wrinkles, redundant fold=5

90 day post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess aesthetic improvement using Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
Time Frame: 90 day post treatment

Overall aesthetic improvement level per Principal Investigator at 90 days compared to baseline on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale.

Very Much Improved (Optimal cosmetic result)=3 Much Improved (Marked improvement from the initial condition, but not completely optimal)=2 No Change (The appearance is essentially the same as baseline)=0 Worse (The appearance is worse than the original condition)= -1 Much Worse (Marked worsening in appearance from the initial condition)= - 2 Very Much Worse (Obvious worsening in appearance from the initial condition)=- 3

90 day post treatment
Assess aesthetic improvement using Subject Satisfaction Scale
Time Frame: 90 day post treatment

Satisfaction with the aesthetic appearance of the treatment area per Subject Satisfaction Scale compared to baseline.

Extremely dissatisfied=0 Somewhat dissatisfied=1 Slightly dissatisfied=2 Neither satisfied or dissatisfied=3 Slightly satisfied=4 Somewhat satisfied=5 Extremely satisfied=6

90 day post treatment
Assess aesthetic improvement in wrinkles using OCT images (optional)
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90 post treatment
Assessment of improvement using OCT images with Vista software to determine wrinkle depth reduction, comparing pre-treatment depth to post treatment depth.
Baseline to Day 90 post treatment
Assess efficacy results using Canfield Software,, by comparing the changes in wrinkles at baseline and 90 days post treatment.
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 90 post treatment
Validated Canfield software comparing baseline wrinkles to day 90 follow up wrinkles via automated photo analysis.
Baseline to Day 90 post treatment
Assess safety profile by recording of adverse events
Time Frame: Adverse events will be recorded immediately treatment, Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 60 and Day 90 post treatment. Ad hoc assessment can occur upon subject report of AE.
The incidence and severity of systemic and local adverse events will be recorded by the PI at all visits and a 14 day diary completed by each subject will also be collected.
Adverse events will be recorded immediately treatment, Day 1, Day 7, Day 30, Day 60 and Day 90 post treatment. Ad hoc assessment can occur upon subject report of AE.
Assess safety profile by reviewing completed 14 day subject diary for potential side effects.
Time Frame: For 14 days post treatment
14 day diary completed by each subject will record potential side effects, level of severity (mild = 1; moderate = 2; severe = 3), and end date of the potential side effects.
For 14 days post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 15, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 21, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AIS 700-00052

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wrinkle

Clinical Trials on MCD

Subscribe