One-Dimensional Mathematical Model-Based Automated Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve

May 14, 2020 updated by: Daria Gognieva, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

The First Experience With Using a One-dimensional Mathematical Model With Fully Automated Algorithm of Extraction of Patient-specific Geometry From CT Images for a Noninvasive Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve.

This study evaluates the diagnostic efficiency of an automated method of noninvasive assessment of the fractional reserve of coronary blood flow.

Fractional flow reserve is estimated with a one-dimensional mathematical model constructed by means of an automated algorithm. Noninvasive method values are thereafter compared with invasive method values.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Noninvasive assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve is almost never applied in the Russian Federation due to the relative novelty and study insufficiency, lack of the appropriate resource base, specific necessary software and trained qualified personnel.

In 2015, scientists from the Institute of Numerical Mathematics RAS in collaboration with specialists of the I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University developed a noninvasive method of fractional flow reserve assessment based on a one-dimensional mathematical model. A model is constructed based on images derived from the coronary computed tomography angiography performed by standard protocol; the method is fully automated.

The aim of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of this technique in clinical practice.

This is a pilot study; we are planning to enroll 30 patients: 13 of them underwent 64-slice computed tomography and are included retrospectively; 17 will be included prospectively, with a 640-slice CT scan. Specialists from the Laboratory of Mathematical Modeling will process CT images and evaluate noninvasive FFR. Ischemia is confirmed if FFR < 0.80 and disproved if FFR ≥ 0.80. After that, the prospective group of patients will be hospitalized for invasive FFR assessment as a reference standard; if ischemia is proved, patients will undergo stent implantation. In the retrospective group, patients already have invasive FFR values estimated.

Statistical analysis will be performed using R programming language packages (cran-r.project.com). Continuous variables will be presented as mean values ± standard deviations, order variables will be presented as medians with interquartile ranges in parentheses. We are going to use the D'Agostino-Pearson omnibus test for the assessment of normality of distribution and construct a Q-Q Plot. We will compare these two methods with the Bland-Altman analysis and ROC-analysis and will assess the degree of correlation with the Pearson's chi-squared.

The study should result in determining the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the method.

After the active phase of the research is done, we are planning to proceed observation on the prospective group of patients to verify the endpoints.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients providing written informed consent
  2. Scheduled to undergo clinically-indicated non-emergent invasive coronary angiography (ICA)
  3. Has undergone >640 multidetector CCTA within 60 days prior to ICA
  4. No cardiac interventional therapy between the CCTA and ICA

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery
  2. Prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for which suspected coronary artery lesion(s) are within a stented coronary vessel
  3. Contraindication to adenosine, including 2nd or 3rd-degree heart block; sick sinus syndrome; long QT syndrome; severe hypotension, severe asthma, severe COPD or bronchodilator-dependent COPD
  4. Suspicion of acute coronary syndrome (acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina)
  5. Recent prior myocardial infarction within 40 days of ICA
  6. Known complex congenital heart disease
  7. Prior pacemaker or internal defibrillator lead implantation
  8. Prosthetic heart valve
  9. Significant arrhythmia or tachycardia
  10. Impaired chronic renal function (serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dl
  11. Patients with known anaphylactic allergy to iodinated contrast
  12. Pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status
  13. Body mass index >35
  14. Patient requires an emergent procedure
  15. Evidence of ongoing or active clinical instability, including acute chest pain (sudden onset), cardiogenic shock, unstable blood pressure with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, and severe congestive heart failure (NYHA III or IV) or acute pulmonary edema
  16. Any active, serious, life-threatening disease with a life expectancy of less than 2 months
  17. Inability to comply with study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FFRct
Patients will receive cCTA, ICA, FFRct, and FFRinv per protocol.
Fractional flow reserve measured during cardiac catheterization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Accuracy of FFRct
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of FFRct at the vessel level using binary outcomes whith compared to FFR as the reference standard.
through study completion, an average of 8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daria Gognieva, MD, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
  • Study Director: Philipp Kopylov, Professor, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 5, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data disclosure is not permitted by the local ethics committee. For more information about the study, you need to contact the principal investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on FFR

Subscribe