Ultrasound-Guided Aspiration of PTA vs Conventional Landmark Technique - a RCT

August 19, 2019 updated by: Tobias Todsen

A Randomized Multicenter Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Aspiration of Peritonsillar Abscess Versus Conventional Landmark Technique

The study is a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at two different centers at the Department of ORL - Head & Neck Surgery, Odense University Hospital and the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Rigshospitalet.

The research question is:

In a group of patients referred to an otolaryngology department with objective findings of peritonsillar abscess, what are the effects of using intraoral ultrasound to diagnose and guide needle aspiration compared to the traditional landmark-based technique, when measured by the number of performed needle aspirations, procedure-related pain and days on sick leave?

The secondary outcomes measured are

  • Number of hospitalization days
  • Number of Quincy tonsillectomies
  • Number of visits to an outpatient clinic
  • Patient-reported outcome (measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale)

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Copenhagen East
      • Copenhagen, Copenhagen East, Denmark, 2100
        • Recruiting
        • Rigshospitalet
    • Odense C
      • Odense, Odense C, Denmark, 5000
        • Recruiting
        • Odense University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Sanne H Michaelsen, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients referred to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology suspected for peritonsillar abscess
  • Clinical findings of peritonsillar abscess by one of the following:

    1. Trismus
    2. Unilateral tonsillar/peritonsillar swelling

Exclusion criteria:

  • Compromised airways or suspected retro / parapharyngeal abscess
  • Needle aspiration of pus already performed (or participated in the study once earlier)
  • Cannot understand the written information

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: The landmark technique
PTA a needle aspiration attempted according to the landmark technique is conducted. If the initial aspiration is unsuccessful, two additional attempts are made in the middle and lower pole of the tonsil.
A 14G needle aspiration is inserted blindly in the superior tonsil pol where pus aspiration is attempted.
EXPERIMENTAL: Ultrasound-guided aspiration
An intraoral ultrasound is conducted with a Burr-Hole N11C5s transducer (BK Ultrasound) and if an abscess cavity is suspected, an ultrasound-guided aspiration is performed with an in-plane needle guide attached to guide the needle.
The ultrasound transducer (either Hockey Stick or Burr-Hole N11C5s transducer from BK Ultrasound) is placed on the palatoglossal arch on the affected side and sweeped from the cranial to caudal end of the tonsil to look for an abscess cavity identified as a hypoechoic area with ill-defined margins.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
needle aspirations
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.
total number of needle aspirations performed
From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.
proportion of succesfull needle aspirations
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.
proportion of needle aspirations with aspiration of pus
From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.
days on sick leave
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.
Total number of days on sick leave after first intervention
From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of hospitalization days
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.
From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.
Number of quincy tonsillectomies
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.
From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.
Number of visits in outpatient clinic
Time Frame: Until full recovery from peritonsilar infection
Until full recovery from peritonsilar infection
Patient-reported outcome
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.
Patients are asked to choose one number, on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain), corresponding to the intensity of their pain - meassured using a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-11).
From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 26, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 30, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peritonsillar Abscess

Clinical Trials on The landmark technique

3
Subscribe