Pre-procedural Ultrasound Techniques Versus Conventional Landmark Technique of Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Pre-procedural Ultrasound Techniques Versus the Conventional Landmark Technique of Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients

Traditionally, spinal anesthesia is performed using the palpation of bony landmark to identify the level and point of entry of the spinal needle. Recently, ultrasound imaging has become an increasingly popular procedure among anesthesiologists to guide neuraxial blockade. Most of the studies on pre-procedural ultrasound-guided neuraxial techniques are limited to a midline approach using a transverse median views. The parasagittal oblique view consistently offers better ultrasound view of the neuraxis compared to the transverse median view. However, it is still not evident whether these superior parasagittal oblique views will lead to an easier paramedian needle insertion. In the literature, there are no studies directly comparing the US-guided paramedian approach using the parasagittal oblique (PSO) view, the US-guided midline approach using the transverse median view, and the conventional landmark midline approach to perform spinal anesthesia in the elderly patients, in particular for the teaching of novice anesthesia residents.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Anesthesia
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Landmark technique; Other: Ultrasound-guided paramedian technique; Other: Ultrasound-guided midline technique

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to find out the optimal technique to perform spinal anesthesia by residents in training. Thus the investigators will compare preprocedural ultrasound-guided paramedian technique using parasagittal oblique view vs preprocedural ultrasound-guided midline technique using transverse median view vs landmark-guided midline technique of spinal anesthesia in the elderly population. Our hypothesis is that both preprocedural US-guided techniques are superior to the conventional landmark-guided midline technique with regard to ease of performance defined as success rate at first attempt, number of puncture attempts, spinal procedure time, and patient satisfaction.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 180
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Lebanon
  • Beirut, Lebanon
    • American University of Beirut Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 60 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients scheduled for surgery amenable to spinal anesthesia, aged more than 60 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 to 4.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients who are unable to give consent, refuse spinal anesthesia, have spinal abnormalities (including scoliosis and previous spine operations with instrumentation) or have contraindications to spinal anesthesia, including allergy to local anesthetics or a bleeding diathesis

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: OTHER
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: PARALLEL
• Masking: NONE

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Landmark technique; As intervention, patients in this group are administered landmark guided midline spinal anesthesia.	Other: Landmark technique; The site of needle insertion will be determined via manual palpation. A line joining the superior aspect of the iliac crests posteriorly (Tuffier's line') will be used as a surface landmark for the L4 vertebral body. The midline will be established by palpation of the tips of the spinous processes, and the site of needle insertion will be marked on the patient's skin. The interspace that appears widest, based on manual palpation, will be chosen for the first attempt. If the first attempt is unsuccessful, further attempts can be made at the same interspace or another interspace.
EXPERIMENTAL: Ultrasound-guided paramedian technique; As intervention, patients in this group are administered spinal anesthesia based on preprocedural ultrasound-guided paramedian technique using parasagittal oblique view	Other: Ultrasound-guided paramedian technique; The transducer will be applied in the parasagittal plane and the intervertebral levels will be identified by counting upwards from the sacrum (continuous hyperechoic line). The probe will then be angled obliquely to obtain a PSO view. The locations of the interlaminar spaces will be identified by visualizing the ligamentum flavum-dura mater complex and the posterior aspect of the vertebral body. The angulation at which the ligamentum flavum-dura mater complex and posterior vertebral body are best visualized will be considered the optimal angle for needle insertion and clearly communicated to the operator. The interlaminar space will be centered on the ultrasound screen and a skin marker will be used to make a mark on the patient's back at the middle of the ultrasound probe.
EXPERIMENTAL: Ultrasound-guided midline technique; As intervention, patients in this group are administered spinal anesthesia based on preprocedural ultrasound-guided midline technique using transverse median view	Other: Ultrasound-guided midline technique; The transducer will be applied in the parasagittal plane, and after identification of the intervertebral levels, the probe will be rotated 90 degree to obtain the TM view. The transducer is moved in a cephalad-caudad direction between the spinous processes of L2 and L5 vertebra. The probe will be tilted slightly up and down to ensure a sufficient echogenic window at the selected intervertebral space. A skin marker will be used to make a mark on the patient's back at the middle of the ultrasound probe. The angle at which the ligamentum flavum-dura mater complex and the posterior aspect of the vertebral body are best visualized will be noted

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Rate of successful dural puncture on the first needle insertion attempt	Rate of successful dural puncture on the first needle insertion attempt which is defined as the percentage of successful dural puncture on the first introducer needle advancement through skin; each skin puncture by introducer is considered as a needle insertion attempt.	up to 5 minutes from the start of insertion of the introducer of the spinal needle

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
overall success rate in every technique	Overall success rate in every technique is defined as percentage of successful spinal anesthesia as evidenced by CSF flow through the spinal needle before spinal drug injection and a sensory block level >T10 15min after injection of spinal drug.	60 minutes from the start of insertion of introducer of the spinal needle
Number of introducer needle insertion attempts	Number of introducer needle insertion attempts is defined as the number of times the introducer needle was withdrawn from the skin and reinserted.	45 minutes from the start of insertion of introducer of the spinal needle
spinal procedure time	In groups US, period beginning when probe is first placed on patient's back and ending when examination is complete. In group LM, period beginning when patient's back is palpated first and ending when examination is complete.	60 minutes
patient satisfaction	Patient satisfaction will be scored as following: Very good; Good; Satisfactory; Unpleasant; Very unpleasant	5 min after completion of administration of SA:
Number of spinal needle redirections	Spinal needle redirected without complete withdrawal of the introducer of the spinal needle from skin	45 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: American University of Beirut Medical Center
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Sahar Siddik-Sayyid, MD, American University of Beirut Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Rizk MS, Zeeni CA, Bouez JN, Bteich NJ, Sayyid SK, Alfahel WS, Siddik-Sayyid SM. Preprocedural ultrasound versus landmark techniques for spinal anesthesia performed by novice residents in elderly: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Nov 11;19(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0882-8.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: November 1, 2015
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): January 1, 2018
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): January 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 11, 2015
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 15, 2016
• First Posted (ESTIMATE): January 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): January 10, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 8, 2019
• Last Verified: January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Ultrasound; Elderly; Spinal anesthesia; Landmark
• Other Study ID Numbers: ANES.SS.13

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO