Evaluation of a Telemedicine System for Patients Carried for Bariatric Surgery (Bartélémis)

February 9, 2021 updated by: IHU Strasbourg
This study is intended to study the feasibility of a telemedicine system to monitor and control certain vital parameters before and after surgery for obesity. During the preoperative preparation phase, weight, exercise, blood pressure and heart rate are recorded and transmitted to the patient's surgeon. In the immediate post operative period, the heart rate is a sensitive and reliable indicator of the occurrence of a complication. A telemetry system will allow rapid home return, continuous monitoring and early warning in the event of a problem. Prolonged follow-up identical to that started preoperatively should allow improvement and better control of weight loss by monitoring especially physical exercise.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The evolution of the health system requires a rationalization of the supply of care and the care of patients. It has allowed the evolution and generalization of ambulatory surgery for certain pathologies. For other pathologies, a hospital stay is still desirable with a tendency to decrease the length of stay. Thanks to the telemedicine platforms, specialized medical monitoring can be extended pre- and post-operatively to ensure good patient preparation and quality secure follow-up.

Early return to home is an essential parameter in optimizing the distribution of hospital resources. Several studies have shown improved clinical outcomes, fewer complications, more beds available, and lower hospital costs. The development of outpatient surgery has enabled the establishment of systems allowing a return home in secure conditions. Early return home is also a wish of the patient. He becomes an actor of his own health. Obesity surgery is an exemplary specialty for the care of patients. The ideal course of care is perfectly codified both preoperatively and postoperatively. Nevertheless, this ideal care path is not always respected especially in structures too small to offer a real integrated multidisciplinary follow-up. Pre- and postoperative management solutions on the Internet exist but require a voluntary and active adherence of the patient. They allow a stronger involvement of the patient in his approach, they are nascent and integrate no connected solution for automated monitoring of the patient. Telemedicine can now allow continuous monitoring without the need for face-to-face interaction. The automatic collection of the physical activity and the heart rate makes it possible to guarantee the involvement of the patient in his preparation. After the intervention, the monitoring of the occurrence of complications can be delegated to connected objects with alert transmission according to parameters defined in advance. In particular, the heart rate is a sensitive indicator and will be followed by two sensors (activity bracelet and pulse oximeter). These complications occur mainly in the 15 days following the intervention, they are rare in immediate postoperative. The hospital stay is no longer necessary for a simple surveillance. In case of receipt of an alert, the surgeon contacts the patient to check his state of health. An adapted action is then engaged.

The late postoperative follow-up throughout this document corresponds to the phase following the immediate postoperative phase. This late postoperative follow-up can be improved with the support of telemonitoring (activity, change in weight.) The addition of connected devices allows a stronger and faster interaction between the patient and his doctors, providing close monitoring and appropriate support.

The study focuses on assessing the reliability of a remote monitoring system. The implementation of this remote monitoring system is subordinated to the reliability of the data transmissions between the connected objects and the remote site which receives the data, interprets them and generates the alerts.

The motivation of the patient is appreciated by the acceptance of connected objects.

During this study, the remote monitoring system is offered in addition to the usual care. The usual care does not change and is not impaired. This study concerns only one group of patients, there is no control group since the investigators seek to validate the reliability of remote surveillance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Strasbourg, France, 67 091
        • Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, NHC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient (s) applying for bariatric surgery
  2. Patient aged 18 to 65
  3. Compliance with the High Authority of Health (HAS) criteria:

    • BMI> 40 without comorbidities
    • BMI> 35 with cardiovascular, metabolic, respiratory or rheumatic comorbidity,
    • Psychological follow-up well followed for 4 to 6 months
  4. Patient with an ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score less than or equal to 2
  5. Patient able to receive and understand information about the study
  6. Patient able to manipulate connected objects
  7. Patient (e) affiliated to the French social security system
  8. Patient who does not live in the white area of wireless telephone coverage.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient unable to give informed consent
  2. Patient unable to use the connected tools (Internet)
  3. Patient whose general condition is not favorable to participation in the study
  4. Patient presenting, in the opinion of the investigator, a condition that may prevent participation in the procedures provided for in the study
  5. Patient in exclusion period (determined by previous or current study)
  6. Patient under the protection of justice
  7. Patient under guardianship or trusteeship
  8. Patient with epilepsy
  9. Patient who is sensitive to light flashes
  10. Patient with deformity of the ear
  11. Patient with bleeding ear

Exclusion Criteria :

  1. Patient whose home is in a white GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) zone or white zone in reception and 3G (third generation) transmission
  2. Patient (e) not knowing how to use connected objects.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Monitoring evaluation
Monitoring evaluation by connected devices: Wristband activity tracker "Garmin Vivosmart® 3", "Fora® Scale 550", "Terraillon® Tensioscreen", Pulse oximeter "Nonin® 3230", thermometer "Fora® IR20b"

All patients will be monitored before and after the bariatric surgery:

  • During the preoperative preparation phase: weight, exercise, blood pressure and heart rate
  • In the immediate post operative period: continuous monitoring of the heart rate with a telemetry system
  • Prolonged follow-up: weight, exercise, blood pressure and heart rate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reliability of a remote monitoring system during treatment for bariatric surgery evaluated in days between two failures
Time Frame: From the inclusion to 6 months after the surgery
The reliability of the system, corresponding to the average time between two failures, over the 9 months of study for each of the 30 patients. A failure is a momentary and abrupt loss of the ability of the system to transmit data.
From the inclusion to 6 months after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient acceptance of adding a telemonitoring device to their care evaluated in percentage of patients who signed a consent
Time Frame: Inclusion period of 4 months
Acceptance is the ratio of the number of patients who signed the consent to the number of total patients to whom the study was presented as a percentage.
Inclusion period of 4 months
Relevance of the data received from each connected object (activity bracelet, scales, blood pressure monitor, thermometer and pulse oximeter) evaluated in percentage of data sent and verified
Time Frame: Study duration of 18 months
The relevance of the data corresponds to the number of data sent and verified, using the alert system, of each of the connected objects (activity bracelet, scales, blood pressure monitor, thermometer and pulse oximeter) the number of data sent by the system over the entire duration of the study (activity bracelet, scale, tensiometer) or the entire immediate postoperative period (thermometer, pulse oximeter), in percentage.
Study duration of 18 months
Durability of the data over a defined period evaluated in number of connections.
Time Frame: From the inclusion to 6 months after the surgery
The durability of the data corresponds to the number of connections interrupted or lost in a duration of more than 90 minutes per patient
From the inclusion to 6 months after the surgery
Ratio of the number of patients who performed all the prescribed autonomic measures requested on the total number of patients included in the study
Time Frame: Study duration of 18 months
Ratio of the number of patients who performed all the prescribed autonomic measures requested on the total number of patients included in the study, as a percentage. It will be evaluated by age categories (18-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 54-65 years), sex (male and female) and obesity classes (35.00 ≤ BMI). ≤ 39.99 kg / m² and BMI ≥ 40.00 kg / m²)
Study duration of 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michel Vix, MD, Service Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Nouvel Hôpital Civil de Strasbourg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 18-003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bariatric Surgery Candidate

Subscribe