tDCS for the Management of Multiple Sclerosis Related Fatigue

December 1, 2021 updated by: NYU Langone Health

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for the Management of Multiple Sclerosis Related Fatigue

This is a pragmatic clinical trial that aims to determine the effect of tDCS on symptomatic fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients. This is a randomized, blinded, sham-controlled study design to determine the effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on MS participants to reduce feelings of fatigue.120 participants with MS and clinically-significant fatigue (as defined by a score of >36 on the Fatigue Severity Scale) will be recruited to participate in either an active or sham treatment condition.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

122

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • NYU Langone Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Definite MS diagnosis, all subtypes
  • Fatigue Severity Scale score of 36 or greater
  • Score of 7.5 or less on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (with caregiver proxy required for those with scores of 7.5 or greater)
  • Ability to understand the informed consent process and provide consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary neurologic, psychiatric or other medical disorder other than MS
  • History of seizures or seizure disorder
  • History of head trauma or medical device in head or neck
  • Clinically significant abnormality on EKG
  • Current symptomatic treatment for fatigue
  • Symbol Digit Modalities Test or SDMT score≥3.0 SD from published norms
  • WRAT-4 reading level below average (<85) (estimated general intellectual function)
  • Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI- FS) score ≥10
  • Current chronic headaches or migraines
  • Skin disorder/sensitive near stimulation locations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active
Active target 2.0mA tDCS (n=60)
Other Names:
  • Soterix Mini-Ct Device
Placebo Comparator: Sham
sham left-anodal dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLFPC) montage

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change from baseline in the self-reported Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue instrument.
Time Frame: 7 Days post end of Treatment
The minimally important difference representing a clinically significant improvement in patient-reported fatigue on the 7-item PROMIS Fatigue Scale is defined as a 3.0 point change in raw score. Clinically-significant response to tDCS treatment by the conservative measurement of >3.0 points on the PROMIS Fatigue Scale.
7 Days post end of Treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Leigh Charvet, MD, New York Langone Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

For individual participant data meta-analysis. Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee ("learned intermediary") identified for this purpose.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Active tDCS

Subscribe