- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03845803
Reducing Sedentary Behaviour in Office Workers
"Sit - Stand - Be Fit" - Influence of Sit/Stand Workstations on Sedentary Behaviour and the Prevalence and Intensity of Musculoskeletal Diseases in Office Workers of an Austrian Bank Headquarter
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background Currently, 18.5 percent of all European Union citizens sit more than 7.5 hours per day. It is estimated that approximately one third of white-collar workers spend more than 7.5 hours per day seated. Moreover, it is assumed that working adults sit for up to two thirds of their working time on average, with some office-based occupations (e.g. call center employees) requiring workers to sit for more than 80% of their working day. Although the decline in physical activity helped to reduce physical overload and the accompanying risks, ongoing activity pattern changes are relevant factors in the development of health-related problems. Sedentary and sitting time are both risk factors for several diseases, such as obesity, depression and all-cause mortality. Interestingly, risks of prolonged sitting are independent of physical activity levels.
A possible way to reduce occupational sitting time are sit/stand workstations. Sit-to-stand workstations provide an incentive for people to work in either a sitting or standing posture and facilitate regular sit-to-stand transitions. Despite the global increase in incidence rates, the majority of office workers in Austria are still not provided with this kind of workstation because of concerns about utilization rates.
Aim The primary aim of this observational study is to investigate the mid-term effect (1 year) of sit/stand workstations on occupational sitting and standing time as well as the prevalence and intensity of neck and back pain. Secondary aims are the short- and mid-term effects of sit/stand workstations on weekly physical activity as well as daily and weekly sitting and standing time. Furthermore, their effect on the prevalence and intensity of shoulder pain should be analysed. Lastly, predictors for postural changes at work (between sitting and standing) as well as correlates between the IPAQ and OSPAQ questionnaire for office workers should be determinated.
Intervention All employees of an Austrian bank headquarter will be newly equipped with sit/stand workstations by their own company. Prior to this furniture change, all employees were equipped with traditional sit workstations. The study uses the company induced furniture change for scientific purposes. Hence, the furniture change was not driven by the research institution (university).
Methods Within this study 4 assessment days will be executed. They will be carried out 2 weeks before (baseline) and 3, 6 and 12 months after the furniture change. On each assessment day an online survey will be applied. This survey consists of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ), the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and well as questions addressing participants´ characteristics.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Upper Austria
-
Linz, Upper Austria, Austria, 4020
- University of Applied Sciences for Health Professions Upper Austria
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All office workers from a bank headquarter who are affected by the office furniture change (replacement of traditional sitting work desks by sit/stand workstations)
- People with sufficient German language skills (able to understand the questions of the questionnaires)
- People who gave their written consent to participate prior to involvement in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- People without an employment at the examined bank headquarter
- People who are not able to use sit/stand workstations due to physical impairments
- People on educational or maternity leave
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in occupational sitting time
Time Frame: baseline, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the amount of occupational sitting time by means of the OSPAQ. The amount of working hours in the last 7 days will be multiplied by the percentage of time spent sitting at work in the last 7 days to get the overall amount of minutes sitting at work per week. |
baseline, 12 months
|
|
Changes in occupational standing time
Time Frame: baseline, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the amount of occupational standing time by means of the OSPAQ. The amount of working hours in the last 7 days will be multiplied by the percentage of time spent standing at work in the last 7 days to get the overall amount of minutes standing at work per week. |
baseline, 12 months
|
|
Changes in the one year prevalence of neck pain
Time Frame: baseline, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the one year prevalence of neck pain by means of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire.
|
baseline, 12 months
|
|
Changes in the one year prevalence of back pain
Time Frame: baseline, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the one year prevalence of back pain by means of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire.
|
baseline, 12 months
|
|
Changes in the average one year neck pain intensity (VAS)
Time Frame: baseline, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the one year neck pain intensity by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (heavy pain) points.
|
baseline, 12 months
|
|
Changes in the average one year back pain intensity (VAS)
Time Frame: baseline, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the one year neck pain intensity by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (heavy pain) points.
|
baseline, 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in occupational sitting time
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Subjects will report the amount of occupational sitting time by means of the OSPAQ. The amount of working hours in the last 7 days will be multiplied by the percentage of time spent sitting at work in the last 7 days to get the overall amount of minutes sitting at work per week. |
baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Changes in occupational standing time
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Subjects will report the amount of occupational standing time by means of the OSPAQ. The amount of working hours in the last 7 days will be multiplied by the percentage of time spent standing at work in the last 7 days to get the overall amount of minutes standing at work per week. |
baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Changes in the average one year prevalence of shoulder pain
Time Frame: baseline, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the one year prevalence of shoulder pain by means of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire.
|
baseline, 12 months
|
|
Changes in the average one year shoulder pain intensity (VAS)
Time Frame: baseline, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the one year neck pain intensity by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (heavy pain) points.
|
baseline, 12 months
|
|
Changes in the average one week prevalence of neck pain
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the one week prevalence of neck pain by means of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire.
|
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
|
Changes in the average one week prevalence of back pain
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the one week prevalence of back pain by means of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire.
|
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
|
Changes in the average one week prevalence of shoulder pain
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the one week prevalence of shoulder pain by means of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire.
|
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
|
Changes in the average one week neck pain intensity (VAS)
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the one year neck pain intensity by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (heavy pain) points.
|
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
|
Changes in the average one week back pain intensity (VAS)
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the one year neck pain intensity by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (heavy pain) points.
|
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
|
Changes in the average one week shoulder pain intensity (VAS)
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
Subjects will report the one year neck pain intensity by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (heavy pain) points.
|
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
|
Changes in daily sitting time
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
Subjects will directly report their daily sitting time in hours per day by means of the IPAQ.
|
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
|
Changes in weekly physical activity
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
Subjects will report their weekly physical activity by means of the IPAQ. The amount of walking, moderate and high intensity physical activities as total time in minutes per day, their metabolic equivalents of task (MET) and the frequency in days per week will be multiplied to assess the overall weekly physical activity in MET minutes per week. Physical activities will only be considered if they lasted at least for 10 or more minutes over the past 7 days. |
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bernhard Schwartz, MSc BSc, University of Applied Sciences for Health Professions Upper Austria
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- van Uffelen JG, Wong J, Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, Riphagen I, Gilson ND, Burton NW, Healy GN, Thorp AA, Clark BK, Gardiner PA, Dunstan DW, Bauman A, Owen N, Brown WJ. Occupational sitting and health risks: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Oct;39(4):379-88. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.024.
- Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Reed GW, Peters JC. Obesity and the environment: where do we go from here? Science. 2003 Feb 7;299(5608):853-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1079857.
- Loyen A, van der Ploeg HP, Bauman A, Brug J, Lakerveld J. European Sitting Championship: Prevalence and Correlates of Self-Reported Sitting Time in the 28 European Union Member States. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 2;11(3):e0149320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149320. eCollection 2016.
- Alkhajah TA, Reeves MM, Eakin EG, Winkler EA, Owen N, Healy GN. Sit-stand workstations: a pilot intervention to reduce office sitting time. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.027.
- Chau JY, Daley M, Dunn S, Srinivasan A, Do A, Bauman AE, van der Ploeg HP. The effectiveness of sit-stand workstations for changing office workers' sitting time: results from the Stand@Work randomized controlled trial pilot. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Oct 8;11:127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0127-7.
- Straker L, Abbott RA, Heiden M, Mathiassen SE, Toomingas A. Sit-stand desks in call centres: associations of use and ergonomics awareness with sedentary behavior. Appl Ergon. 2013 Jul;44(4):517-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
- Straker L, Mathiassen SE. Increased physical work loads in modern work--a necessity for better health and performance? Ergonomics. 2009 Oct;52(10):1215-25. doi: 10.1080/00140130903039101.
- Brown WJ, Miller YD, Miller R. Sitting time and work patterns as indicators of overweight and obesity in Australian adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003 Nov;27(11):1340-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802426.
- Peeters GM, Burton NW, Brown WJ. Associations between sitting time and a range of symptoms in mid-age women. Prev Med. 2013 Feb;56(2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.12.008. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
- van der Ploeg HP, Chey T, Korda RJ, Banks E, Bauman A. Sitting time and all-cause mortality risk in 222 497 Australian adults. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Mar 26;172(6):494-500. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.2174.
- van Uffelen JG, van Gellecum YR, Burton NW, Peeters G, Heesch KC, Brown WJ. Sitting-time, physical activity, and depressive symptoms in mid-aged women. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Sep;45(3):276-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.009.
- Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):661-6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2046. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
- Kerr J, Takemoto M, Bolling K, Atkin A, Carlson J, Rosenberg D, Crist K, Godbole S, Lewars B, Pena C, Merchant G. Two-Arm Randomized Pilot Intervention Trial to Decrease Sitting Time and Increase Sit-To-Stand Transitions in Working and Non-Working Older Adults. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 6;11(1):e0145427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145427. eCollection 2016.
- Peddie MC, Bone JL, Rehrer NJ, Skeaff CM, Gray AR, Perry TL. Breaking prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glycemia in healthy, normal-weight adults: a randomized crossover trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Aug;98(2):358-66. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.051763. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- A-2019-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sedentary Lifestyle
-
Eindhoven University of TechnologyCompletedLifestyle | Lifestyle, Healthy | Lifestyle Risk Reduction | Lifestyle, SedentaryBelgium
-
Stanford UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University of California, San DiegoCompleted
-
Loughborough UniversityBritish Heart FoundationCompletedSedentary Lifestyle | Sedentary Behavior | Diet Habit
-
Taipei Medical University WanFang HospitalRecruitingLifestyle, SedentaryTaiwan
-
Brandeis UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
-
University of MiamiCompletedSedentary LifestyleUnited States
-
University of PrimorskaInnorenew CoEUnknown
-
Chinese University of Hong KongCompletedVirtual Trainer System (3rd Version) for Physical Activity Promotion in Middle-aged Hong Kong AdultsSedentary LifestyleHong Kong
-
VakgroepBewegingsEnSportwetenschappenUniversity GhentCompleted
Clinical Trials on Reducing sedentary behaviour
-
Western University, CanadaCompletedQuality of Life | Cognitive Impairment | Physical FunctioningCanada
-
Vrije Universiteit BrusselTerminatedChronic Low-back Pain | Sedentary BehaviorBelgium
-
University of AlbertaAlberta Innovates Health Solutions; Glenrose FoundationCompleted
-
Texas Tech UniversityCompleted
-
Liu ShuxianHarbin Medical UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of Vic - Central University of CataloniaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Glasgow Caledonian University; University...SuspendedSedentary Behavior | Urinary Incontinence in Old AgeSpain
-
Western University, CanadaSt. Joseph's Health Care LondonCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes | Sedentary LifestyleCanada
-
Hasselt UniversityCompletedPhysical Activity | Sedentary Behavior | Athletes | Cardiometabolic HealthBelgium
-
University of Colorado, DenverCompleted
-
Western University, CanadaCompletedSedentary Lifestyle