Computer-assisted Fetal Monitoring - Obstetrics (SURFAO-Obst)

June 3, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Surveillance fœtale assistée Par Ordinateur - Obstétrique

In the context of fetal heart monitoring, the SurFAO project offers an alternative to current clinical routines. The challenge is to extract, from few non-invasive sensors on the maternal abdomen, a fetal electrocardiogram (ECGf) of great quality allowing a clinical diagnosis (follow-up of the FHR (fetal heart rate)) and extraction of ECG waveforms).

The proposed approach proposes a technological breakthrough shared by a consortium of researchers and clinicians. The originality is driven by innovative methodological choices: the use of a multimodal system (ECG coupling with PCG (phonocardiographic)) for the signal acquisition in order to increase the robustness of information extraction, by taking into account clinical uses and the need for the monitoring process support, and by setting up a reference for this multimodal database.

The objective is to feed a database that will be used in the future to develop ECGf extraction methods estimating the FHR.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

To monitor the well-being of a fetus or for a clinical diagnosis, a challenge is to extract a fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) signal of high quality from a limited number of non-invasive sensors on the maternal abdomen.

During childbirth, fetal monitoring is assessed by the fetal heart rate (FHR), classically from cardiotocography (CTG). The aim is to monitor FHR variability anomalies that reflect a too high fetal malaise. It is very common to have difficulties to reliably record FHR due to confusion of rhythms of the mother and the fetus that can lead to unnecessary caesareans. With 800000 childbirths in France per year, improving the reliability of FHR estimation by fECG analysis is therefore of high clinicalinterest.

To deal with, the proposed approach aims at coupling two complementary cardiac information acquired at the best-located position. Therefore, the proposed solution is (i) to combine the use of electrophysiological sensors ECG and acoustic sensors of microphonic type that can register phonocardiographic signals (PCG), (ii) to assist by computer the clinical expertise to choose the best sensors location. Several methodological aspects will be considered: to improve the robustness of the FHR estimation with degraded signals based on multimodality, to overcome some practical limitations to extract the fECG waveforms by enhancing the process extraction with PCG and to assist the user in the sensors choice and placement by predicting their best locations and their kinds (ECG or PCG).

The SurFAO project proposes then an original approach of computer-assisted fetal monitoring and thus differs from previous published works of fECG extraction solutions, only based on algorithmic performances mostly in well-controlled situations. The original aspects of the investigator's proposal are the innovative methodological choices based on multimodality and informed recording process, the consideration of the medical uses and of the necessity to help the clinical monitoring to design the algorithms, the new reference multimodal database, and the academic-clinical consortium, that will guarantee the relevance of all proposed parts.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • University Hospital Grenoble

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Pregnant women

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant of a single pregnancy,
  • Aged over 18,
  • During the 9th month of pregnancy (>= 37 weeks),
  • With uncomplicated maternal and fetal pregnancy follow-up,
  • With a BMI between 18.5 and 30 at the beginning of pregnancy,
  • Without a notable medical history,
  • Enrolled in a social security scheme,
  • Having signed the consent form for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject under guardianship, protected by law or deprived of liberty (Article L1121-8),
  • Subject under administrative or judicial supervision,
  • Subject in exclusion period of another study,
  • With toxic consumption (i.e. tobacco, alcohol, cannabis),
  • With inaccurate pregnancy term,
  • With denial of pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pregnancy volunteer subjects

Subjects who will agree to participate in the investigator's study will be pregnant healthy subjects with no particular antecedent, followed at the University Hospital of Grenoble for a physiological pregnancy; their child will be not affected by any prenatal pathology.

Subjects will be enrolled in a 30 min monitoring phase to collect signals from ECG-PCG-CTG abdominal and thoracic non invasive sensors.

ECG-PCG-CTG synchronized signals acquisition over a monitoring phase of 30 minutes. These signals will be acquired with passive non invasive sensors (abdominal and thoracic).
Other Names:
  • Non invasive ECG-PCG-CTG sensors

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ECG Signals Database
Time Frame: 30 minutes

Synchronized signals from ECG electrodes during a 30-minute monitoring phase. Tracking of the electrical activity in the heart. During the study period we will collect R wave, P wave, QT interval, ST interval, QRS complex, RR interval components of the ECG.

Signals were then processed to extract fetal ECG.

30 minutes
PCG Signals Database
Time Frame: 30 minutes

Synchronized signals from PCG sensors during a 30-minute monitoring phase. Acquisition of acoustic information reflecting the contraction and relaxation of the heart.

During the study period we will collect S1 and S2 sounds components of the PCG. Signals were then processed to extract fetal PCG.

30 minutes
CTG Signals Database
Time Frame: 30 minutes
CTG is continuous monitoring of the fetal heart rate (gold standard reference). Physicians evaluate specific clinical CTG parameters by means of visual inspection.
30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subject Acceptability: Score
Time Frame: 15 minutes
The subject acceptability score will be composed by the addition of 7 scales. These scales have been specifically created for the SurFAO system. The score can go from 0 (worst) to 70 (best). Each scale can give from 0 to 10 points to the final score.
15 minutes
Subject Acceptability : Descriptive analysis
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Open questions will be asked to the subjects in a questionnaire. A descriptive analysis will be done with the answers.
15 minutes
Use Error evaluation : System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: 15 minutes

The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a validated tool for assessing the subjective usability of a system, in this case, the SurFAO System. It contains 10 questions that are rated on a scale from 1 to 5. "The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100." Jeff Sauro established the average score of SUS is 68.

The score can go from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

15 minutes
Use Error evaluation : Descriptive analysis
Time Frame: 15 minutes
In a journal, the users will write their difficulties using the system. A descriptive analysis will be done with the answers.
15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Véronique Equy, CHU Grenoble Alpes

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe