Prevention of Hypertensive Injury to the Brain by Intensive Treatment of Blood Pressure After Intracerebral Haemorrhage (PROHIBIT-ICH) (PROHIBIT-ICH)

December 5, 2024 updated by: University College, London

Prevention of Hypertensive Injury to the Brain by Intensive Treatment of Blood Pressure After Intracerebral Haemorrhage

PROHIBIT-ICH will randomise participants (target=112) to compare a strategy of intensive blood pressure (BP) treatment (target <120/80 mm Hg) guided by remote telemetric home BP monitoring, versus standard primary care, in adult survivors of small vessel disease-related ICH. The investigators will establish the feasibility and safety of the intervention, the efficacy of BP reduction, and explore whether it reduces the progression of SVD-related injury on brain MRI.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Eligible participants will be identified from acute stroke or high dependency units or outpatient clinics (neurology, geriatric, and neurosurgery) by a member of the research practitioner or member of research/clinical teams. Patients may be under the care of stroke physicians, geriatricians, neurologists, or neurosurgeons.

Baseline:

At baseline, the following trial specific procedures will be carried out after consent as a requirement for the study to commence:

  • Medical history and demographic data recorded
  • Blood pressure medication and dose recorded
  • Blood pressure (BP), three seated office measures
  • Blood test (venepuncture)
  • MRI brain
  • Cognitive assessment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment)
  • Completion of an EQ-5D questionnaire
  • 24-hour ABPM

Randomisation will be done using a web-based system in a 1:1 group assignment ratio to intensive remote telemetric home BP monitoring (RT-HBPM)-guided BP lowering (intervention group) or local primary care alone (control group), with stratification by ICH location (lobar versus non-lobar). In the intervention group, BP medication will adjusted on the basis of daily review of BP measures by the study physician in the central BP-monitoring team to target during 1-3 months to target a daily mean HBPM BP <120/80 mmHg.

Intervention:

The Telemetric Bluetooth home Blood Pressure-monitoring device will monitor participant's BP to keep the target of 120/80mm Hg, if this is not achievable then the BP medication will be adjusted accordingly in order to achieve a target of 120/80mm Hg at 3 months follow-up. BP readings (3 readings over 10-minutes in the seated position in the non dominant arm, unless hemiparesis) will be taken 3 times daily (early morning, early afternoon and evening). All BP data will be automatically transmitted centrally in real time to the device co-ordination site in Oxford. A dedicated research member will be responsible for checking all BP data daily on patients in the study, and will advise on adjusting medication according to a standard protocol based on the latest BHS guideline, to ensure that BP is lowered to the intervention arm target. The local study centre will send new prescriptions directly to patients (with communication simultaneously with the GP). For dose changes, advice will be given to participants by phone by the central study team. All medication changes will be notified to the local research team and GP; responsibility for BP treatment will be by the local PI.

Follow up:

3 month follow-up : completion of 3 month clinical data, blood pressure recorded and completion of Modified Cognitive assessment, EQ-5D questionnaire and home blood pressure acceptability questionnaire. 24-hour ABPM to be performed at the time of the 3 month follow-up visit.

12 month follow-up (Final visit): completion of 12 month CRF, blood pressure recorded, and completion of cognitive assessment and EQ-5D questionnaire. 24-hour ABPM to be performed at the time of the 12 month follow-up visit.

An MRI scan will be performed at baseline and the 12 month follow-up visit on all participants to identify markers of cerebral small vessel disease including:

  • change in white matter hyperintensity volume
  • change in white matter microstructure (DTI)
  • change in the number of CMBs
  • change in cerebral atrophy

Primary outcomes:

(a) BP study

(i) Acceptability: (a) ≥50% of eligible participants who were approached to participate agreed to be recruited; (b) <30% dropout from the intervention group (discontinuation of HBPM against the advice of the BP monitoring centre) prior to one month; (c) patient approval of the monitoring process in ≥70% of those who returned questionnaires.

(ii) Safety: between-group difference in number of serious adverse events related to reducing BP.

(iii) Efficacy: mean group difference in the change from baseline to 3-month follow-up assessment of systolic BP (mean of two sitting readings) in the intervention group versus the control group

(b) Imaging study

(i) Safety: evolution of new infarcts or ICH on 12-month follow-up MRI

(i) Efficacy: the progression on MRI white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume (T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), or T2-weighted images when FLAIR was unavailable) between baseline and 12-month follow-up.

Secondary outcomes:

  1. BP study: (i) between-group difference in mean daytime systolic BP change from baseline ABPM to 3-month ABPM; (ii) between-group differences at 3-month follow-up in assessment systolic BP and in mean daytime systolic BP on ABPM; (iii) between-group difference in number of BP-lowering drugs at follow-up; (iv) the maintenance of differences in BP after completion of centralised monitoring, assessed at 12-24-months follow-up.
  2. Imaging study: neuroimaging outcomes including (but not limited to) the proportion of patients who develop new cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) over 1 year; number of new CMBs at 1 year; new infarcts or intracerebral haemorrhages at 1 year; change in mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA) and other 3T DTI metrics; change in cerebral blood flow (CBF) on 3T PCASL; change in total brain volume, white matter volume and grey matter volume on 3T T1 volumetric images; composite neuroimaging measures (e.g summary SVD scores)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bath, United Kingdom
        • Royal United Hospitals Bath
      • Bury St Edmunds, United Kingdom
        • West Suffolk Hospital
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
        • Cambridge
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH16 4SB
        • Edinburgh
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G51 4TF
        • Glasgow
      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 8AF
        • King's
      • London, United Kingdom, SW17 0QT
        • St George's
      • London, United Kingdom, W12 0HS
        • Imperial
      • London, United Kingdom, WC1B 5EH
        • UCLH
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Croydon University Hospital
      • Luton, United Kingdom
        • Luton & Dunstable Hospital
      • Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG5 1PB
        • Nottingham
      • Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • Oxford
      • Preston, United Kingdom, PR2 9HT
        • Royal Preston
      • Salford, United Kingdom, M6 8HD
        • Salford
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S10 2JF
        • Sheffield

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults (≥30 years) with spontaneous primary ICH (i.e. without known underlying structural, macrovascular or other cause (e.g. arteriovenous malformation, tumour) after adequate investigation at the discretion of the local investigator). This will include participants presumed to have cerebral SVD (both hypertensive arteriopathy and cerebral amyloid angiopathy)
  2. Clinical team opinion that BP control since the ICH is not adequate AND the measured SBP prior to randomisation is ≥130 mm Hg
  3. There is no time limit for recruitment; however, recruitment as soon as is practical after the ICH is encouraged. Recruitment at a later stage is acceptable as long as there is evidence of inadequate BP control AND SBP at randomisation is ≥130 mm Hg
  4. Ability and willingness to undertake BP measurements,, either unassisted or with the help of a relative, friend or carer: this can be undertaken in any destination after hospital discharge (e.g. home, rehabilitation unit, nursing or care home)
  5. Ability and willingness to attend and complete the study assessments including cognitive screen
  6. Ability and willingness to provide informed consent, or with a suitable consultee available and able to participate in the intervention (e.g. with a motivated carer)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to provide informed consent or lack of suitable consultee (if unable to provide personal consent, lack of suitable consultee)
  2. Evidence of a macrovascular or structural cause for ICH (e.g. AVM or tumour)
  3. Diagnosis of dementia (DSM IV criteria, or self-reported or documented in medical records)
  4. Low Functional status (MRS ≥4) before or after ICH or frailty likely to make participation in 1-year follow-up difficult for the participant
  5. Life expectancy <2 years
  6. Taking more than 2 BP-lowering medications (i.e. 3 or more) at the time of consent
  7. Consistently good BP control (below 130/80 mm Hg on measures taken as part of routine clinical care) prior to planned recruitment, judged not to require more intensive treatment
  8. Known flow-restricting intracranial/extracranial large arterial stenosis
  9. Known absence of mobile phone coverage from all network operators and home internet at the participant's home
  10. Known sensitivity or contra-indication to BP treatments (e.g. symptomatic postural hypotension) is not an absolute exclusion criterion, but more information must be provided
  11. Note that participation in other CTIMP or device trial is NOT an automatic exclusion criterion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Telemetric Bluetooth-enabled home BP monitors
Telemetric Bluetooth home BP monitors will be provided to participants during their inpatient stay or clinic visit, and will commence 3- times-daily readings immediately. The BP monitoring team will assess BP readings daily and advise medication adjustments to achieve a target BP of <120/80 mm Hg
Telemetric home monitoring is a promising strategy to facilitate home BP monitoring after stroke, which should improve adherence and optimize medication to better control BP. Telemetry allows patients with hypertension to monitor their own BP and automatically send the information to a secure website, available to their clinicians to monitor and adjust their treatment.
No Intervention: Standard clinical care
Standard clinical care including usual BP treatment, without home monitoring, undertaken in the clinical care setting (primary and/or secondary care)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BP Study: Efficacy
Time Frame: 3 months from randomisation
Magnitude of difference in assessment BP at 3 months in the intervention arm versus the control arm compared with baseline measures
3 months from randomisation
BP Study: Feasibility
Time Frame: 3 months from randomisation
At least ≥50% of eligible participants agree to participate, <30% dropout from the intervention arm (discontinuation of home BP monitoring against the advice of the BP monitoring centre) prior to 1 month, Patient approval of the monitoring process in ≥70% of those randomised to the intervention arm.
3 months from randomisation
BP Study: Safety
Time Frame: 3 months from randomisation
Serious adverse events related to reducing BP in intervention arm
3 months from randomisation
Imaging Study: Efficacy
Time Frame: 12 months from randomisation
Progression in MRI white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume since baseline
12 months from randomisation
Imaging Study: Safety
Time Frame: 12 months from randomisation
Evolution of new infarcts or ICH on 12-month follow-up MRI
12 months from randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of recurrent vascular events
Time Frame: 12 months from randomisation
Any incidence of vascular events reported in both arms
12 months from randomisation
Cognitive ability assessed by the Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) questionnaire in both arms
Time Frame: 12 months from randomisation
The Cognitive Assessment is a questionnaire widely used as a screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. An abbreviated version of the assessment assessing attention, verbal learning, memory, executive functions/language and orientation can be performed over the phone.
12 months from randomisation
The number of BP lowering drugs at 3 months and at 1 year follow-up visits
Time Frame: 12 months from randomisation
This will detected in both arms and compared
12 months from randomisation
Neuroimaging outcomes: the proportion of patients who develop new cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) over 1 year
Time Frame: 12 months from randomisation
neuroimaging outcomes will be measured in both arms
12 months from randomisation
Neuroimaging outcomes: the proportion of patients who develop new infarcts or intracerebral haemorrhages at 1 year
Time Frame: 12 months from randomisation
neuroimaging outcomes will be measured in both arms
12 months from randomisation
Neuroimaging outcomes: measure change in mean diffusivity (MD)
Time Frame: 12 months from randomisation
neuroimaging outcomes will be measured in both arms
12 months from randomisation
Neuroimaging outcomes: measure fractional anisotropy (FA)
Time Frame: 12 months from randomisation
neuroimaging outcomes including (but not limited to) ; ; change in mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA) and other 3T DTI metrics; change in cerebral blood flow (CBF) on 3T PCASL; change in total brain volume, white matter volume and grey matter volume on 3T T1 volumetric images; composite neuroimaging measures (e.g summary SVD scores)
12 months from randomisation
Neuroimaging outcomes: measure change in brain volume
Time Frame: 12 months from randomisation
neuroimaging outcomes including (but not limited to) : change in cerebral blood flow (CBF) on 3T PCASL; change in total brain volume, white matter volume and grey matter volume on 3T T1 volumetric images; composite neuroimaging measures (e.g summary SVD scores)
12 months from randomisation
Mean daytime BP at 1 year on 24-hour ABPM
Time Frame: 12 months from randomisation
The blood pressure measured in both groups
12 months from randomisation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: David Werring, University College, London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 11, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 29, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Clinical Trials on A&D BP Digital Blood Pressure Monitor (UA-767PBT-Ci) CE Declaration UA-767PBT-Ci

Subscribe