Sub-type Specific Genomic Mutations in sBOTs

April 28, 2026 updated by: Stefan Cosyns, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Sub-type Specific Genomic Mutations in Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumors

The aim of this study is to identify different origin in carcinogenesis between serous borderline ovarian tumors presenting a. without implants, b. with non-invasive implants, c. with invasive implants and d. with micropapillary pattern.

The presence of specific mutations could suggest for a more aggressive primary treatment if a higher risk of recurrence can be expected.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Introduction Borderline Ovarian Tumors (BOTs) behave indolently in the vast majority of cases and the prognosis is usually favorable. There is more evidence that two subtypes of BOTs represent a higher risk of recurrence or even progression to an invasive ovarian cancer. In case of a presentation with a micro-papillary grow pattern or when invasive implants are diagnosed the prognosis tend to be less favorable.

Genome sequencing in ovarian cancer helped to differentiate two different pathways in the carcinogenesis.

Low grade serous carcinomas evolving from adenofibromas or borderline tumors over non-invasive micropapillary serous borderline tumors to invasive micropapillary serous carcinoma, show frequent mutations in the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma gene (KRAS), B-Raf Kinase gene(BRAF), Erb-B2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 gene (ERBB2), Phosphatase and Tensin homolog gene (PTEN), Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha gene (PIK3CA) and Catenin Beta 1 gene (CTNNB1). This pathway is called Type I and is characterized by a slow step-wise process. These low-grade invasive tumors are indolent and are known with a better outcome than high-grade invasive tumors.

In contrast the Type II pathway development of invasive tumors is rapid and vast majority of tumors show a Tumor Protein p53 (TP53) mutation and loss of Breast Cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1).

The aim of this study is to identify different origin in carcinogenesis between serous borderline ovarian tumors presenting a. without implants, b. with non-invasive implants, c. with invasive implants and d. with micropapillary pattern.

The presence of specific mutations could suggest for a more aggressive primary treatment if a higher risk of recurrence can be expected.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Brussels Capital
      • Jette, Brussels Capital, Belgium, 1090
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis UZBrussel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with proven serous bordeline ovarian tumors.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Paraffin embedded material from the original borderline ovarian tumor must be present and of good quality for DNA extraction.
  • Original slides are available for central pathological review.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of invasive ovarian carcinoma.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
serous BOT
simple serous BOT ovarian tissue

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the subgroups

  1. serous BOT tissue,
  2. serous BOT tissue with non-invasive implants and
  3. serous BOT tissue with micropapillary grow pattern will undergo a panel testing for Type 1 genes (small panel 15-40 mutations) AND p53 AND BRCA testing

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the serous BOT tissue with invasive implants will undergo a more comprehensive examination (large panel +- 1000 genes checked)

serous BOT with non-invasive implants
BOT ovarian tissue presenting with non-invasive implants

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the subgroups

  1. serous BOT tissue,
  2. serous BOT tissue with non-invasive implants and
  3. serous BOT tissue with micropapillary grow pattern will undergo a panel testing for Type 1 genes (small panel 15-40 mutations) AND p53 AND BRCA testing

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the serous BOT tissue with invasive implants will undergo a more comprehensive examination (large panel +- 1000 genes checked)

sBOT with micropapillary grow pattern
BOT ovarian tissue presenting with micropapillary grow pattern

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the subgroups

  1. serous BOT tissue,
  2. serous BOT tissue with non-invasive implants and
  3. serous BOT tissue with micropapillary grow pattern will undergo a panel testing for Type 1 genes (small panel 15-40 mutations) AND p53 AND BRCA testing

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the serous BOT tissue with invasive implants will undergo a more comprehensive examination (large panel +- 1000 genes checked)

serous BOT with invasive implants
sBOT ovarian tissue presenting with invasive implants at the time of diagnosis

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the subgroups

  1. serous BOT tissue,
  2. serous BOT tissue with non-invasive implants and
  3. serous BOT tissue with micropapillary grow pattern will undergo a panel testing for Type 1 genes (small panel 15-40 mutations) AND p53 AND BRCA testing

Sequencing of the DNA samples extracted from the serous BOT tissue with invasive implants will undergo a more comprehensive examination (large panel +- 1000 genes checked)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
genetic mutations
Time Frame: 2020
amount and type of genetic mutations in different subgroups will be analyzed and compared between the different subgroups. Are the mutations suggestive for a type I or type II pathway differentiation?
2020

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: stef cosyns, dr, UZBrussel

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ovarian Neoplasm Epithelial

Clinical Trials on genomic mutations study

Subscribe