First-In-Man Performance and Safety Evaluation of the CARLO® Device in Midface Osteotomies

September 25, 2020 updated by: Advanced Osteotomy Tools (AOT) AG
The study product is a Cold Ablation Robot-guided Laser Osteotome (CARLO®) robotic surgery device. It is a device that removes hard tissue such as bone by means laser ablation - it is therefore an alternative to Piezo-Electric osteotomes and/or oscillating saws or other mechanical instruments for bone cutting. In this study, the CARLO device is integrated with a computer-assisted pre-operative planning and intra-operative navigation, and will be used for Patients requiring an orthognathic procedure with a mid-face osteotomy, for whom a procedure plan is defined based on preoperative imaging.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The objective of this first-in-man study is to confirm the performance and safety of the CARLO® robotic surgery device (manufactured by Advanced Osteotomy Tools SA) for the execution of preoperatively planned midface osteotomies.

The study is designed and powered to confirm, in clinical use across multiple sites, that the CARLO® device can be used to accurately perform straight-line mid-face osteotomies according to preoperative plans, and with results and a safety profile that are comparable to current state-of-the-art osteotomy methods. Multiple risk mitigations are in place to ensure safety, especially for the initially enrolled patients.

A postoperative follow-up of up to 28 days will be included in this study, in order to assess initial soft tissue healing and recovery, and to enable the identification of any soft-tissue injuries that would not have been immediately apparent.

After end of study of each individual patient, safety monitoring will go on for the duration of the study until the last visit of the last patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Wien, Austria, 1090
        • Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien (AKH Wien)
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
    • AG
      • Aarau, AG, Switzerland, 5051
        • Kantonsspital Aarau AG
    • BS
      • Basel, BS, Switzerland, 4031
        • Universitätsspital Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

[ Indication for performing a mid-face osteotomy using a transoral approach, and suitability for use of CARLO® system: ]

  1. Surgical relocation of the maxilla is indicated, using a mid-face osteotomy via a transoral approach that can be performed using bilateral straight-cut lines (LeFort I). Patients for whom a concomitant re-positioning of the mandibula or other corrections are indicated may be included in the study, as long as these corrections do not affect the repositioning of the maxilla that is being assessed; these additional osteotomies will not be performed using the CARLO® system.

    [ General requirements related to enrollment in a clinical study ]

  2. Patient is willing and able to attend all scheduled visits and comply with all study procedures
  3. Aged ≥18
  4. Ability to understand and give study-specific informed consent
  5. Written informed consent obtained from patient [ General precondition for orthognathic surgery ]
  6. Proven completion of the facial growth

Exclusion Criteria:

[ General contraindications related to enrollment in a clinical study ]

  1. Female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding or are planning to become pregnant during the study
  2. Other patients who are vulnerable persons, such as adults lacking the capacity in the consent procedure, patients in emergency situations.
  3. Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or uncontrolled alcohol abuse.
  4. Presence of any condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or quality of the data
  5. The patient is participating in, or intends to participate in another investigational drug or device clinical trial within 12 months after enrollment
  6. Enrolment of the Investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons [ General contraindications for orthognathic surgery ]
  7. Missing indication for orthognathic surgery
  8. Patients with bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
  9. Patients with increased perioperative airway risk factors due to anatomical structures which limits usage of endotracheal intubation
  10. Patients with intolerance or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics
  11. Patients with consumptive/malignant primary disease (e.g. renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, severe heart failure, etc.) and a life expectancy of < 6 months
  12. Patients that have an odontogenic osteomyelitis
  13. Patients that have a diagnosed bone metabolism disorder e.g. Osteoporosis, Osteomalacia, Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, parathyroid disorders
  14. Patients who have received or are receiving antiresorptive therapy (bisphosphonates).
  15. Patient has previously undergone radiotherapy in the region of the intended osteotomy
  16. Patients with impaired wound healing, for example due to Type II diabetes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Laser osteotomy
The planned mid-face osteotomy (e.g. LeFort I) is performed using the CARLO osteotomy device, where a patient-specific intervention plan based on preoperative imaging is loaded on the system to allow the device to show and suggest a location for the osteotomy.
The mid-face osteotomy - typically according to LeFort I - is performed using a pulsed erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser driven by the CARLO robot arm.
Other Names:
  • Orthognathic Surgery, LeFort I

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical Success of Device Use
Time Frame: Upon completion of the procedure
Successful use of the device through all required steps: initial set-up and self-test, selection of each osteotomy path, previsualization of the path, completion of the osteotomies, and system shut down.
Upon completion of the procedure
RMS error during registration of in-situ patient with pre-operative model
Time Frame: Intra-operative observation
Point-pair matching performed to match preoperative imaging with the in-situ patient could be completed with a Root Mean Square error that does not exceed 1.5 mm.
Intra-operative observation
Position of the performed osteotomies is within 2 mm of the preoperatively planned location.
Time Frame: Intra-operative observation
The postion of the performed osteotomies is measured intraoperatively, relative to (orthogonally located) landmarks selected on the preoperative 3D model. The oucome is successful if this distance does not exceed 2 mm.
Intra-operative observation
Successful completion of the maxillary downfracture and procedure without unusual difficulties.
Time Frame: Intra-operative observation
The maxillary mobilization (pterygo-maxillary disjunction, pull-down fracture) can be completed as usual. No difficulty is encountered that is unusual for the procedure.
Intra-operative observation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Key variables of the osteotomy procedures (durations)
Time Frame: Upon completion of the procedure

Variables assessed include:

  1. Duration of overall osteotomy procedure (first skin incision to skin closure).
  2. Duration of patient registration with the CARLO® device (from on-screen selection of first point to be matched to display of an accepted Root Mean Square Error value).
  3. Duration of CARLO® device cutting for each osteotomy.
Upon completion of the procedure
Absence of unusual complications that delay initial patient discharge.
Time Frame: 1 week post-procedure
Overall well-being of the patient allows a normal discharge from the hospital without unusual delay (within one week).
1 week post-procedure
Absence of unusual soft tissue healing difficulties (14 days status).
Time Frame: 2 weeks post-procedure
During the visit scheduled at 14 days, soft tissue healing allows the removal of stitches as normally possible.
2 weeks post-procedure
Absence of healing anomalies during final visit (28 days status)
Time Frame: 4 weeks post-procedure
During the visit scheduled at 28 days, absence of any anomaly or concern related to post-operative healing.
4 weeks post-procedure
Accuracy of the execution of the planned osteotomy based on postoperative imaging
Time Frame: Assessed ~2 weeks postoperatively based on postoperative imaging (CBCT)
Accuracy of the performed cut measured on postoperative CT (distance of the cut start and end relative to the incisor point and to the ipsilateral mesio-buccal cuspid, respectively). Target is to perform cut within 2 mm of the planned position.
Assessed ~2 weeks postoperatively based on postoperative imaging (CBCT)
Accuracy of the final maxilla location, compared to plan, based on postoperative imaging
Time Frame: Assessed ~2 weeks postoperatively based on postoperative imaging (CBCT)
Accuracy of the maxilla relocation, comparing on CT imaging the position of five defined landmarks (e.g. incisor point, tips of the upper canines, tips of the mesio-buccal cuspid) between the plan and the final result.
Assessed ~2 weeks postoperatively based on postoperative imaging (CBCT)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andreas Müller, Universitätsspital Basel
  • Principal Investigator: Marcello Augello, Kantonsspital Aarau

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abnormalities, Jaw

Clinical Trials on Mid-face osteotomy

Subscribe